Arvi track going hum dil de chuke hai sanam style - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

47

Views

4.8k

Users

16

Likes

175

Frequent Posters

Sexylicious. thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 12 years ago
#41
I just want arvi to unite and I don't care
About anything else. Ekta plz unite ArVi.
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#42
Dear Sharad,

It is not only wrt PR and Pari, I have always held that no child can be illegitimate, no matter what the follies of its parents. This one is of course a special case, and it is noteworthy that no ill will or lack of acceptance has been shown by anyone among either the Ds or the Ks vis a vis Pari, even when they are livid with anger vis a vis Purvi and Arjun (and to my mind rightly so, for I am very conservative in such matters, and I would not believe till the bitter end that a girl brought up as Purvi was brought up could do a thing like that. But let that pass, it is irrelevant now.)

It follows from this that the same level of acceptance and affection should be shown to all children in PR. That is why I was appalled and disgusted to see several posts here, at that time, voicing happiness that Ovi's and Arjun's baby had died. I could not believe that in the desperation to reunite their beloved couple (who, be it noted, threw away their love on their own), some could sink to rejoicing over a child's death.

Not just that, Till now, neither Arjun - who was so traumatised at having been the cause of (as he thought then) Purvi losing her baby, but who was never shown as being similarly guilt-ridden about having caused the death of Ovi's baby, which was also his - nor anyone else, not Manav or Savita or Sulochana, has ever said a word about Ovi's loss, or grieved for the child she had lost. They have not even demanded of Onir what he did with the dead body of that child.

This is very sad and distasteful. It reminds me of what Dhruv's stepmother Suruchi tells him, when she stops him from sitting in his father, King Uttanapadan's lap, where her own son Uttama is already seated, To sit there, she says, you should have been born to me. It seems it is the same with Ovi's baby, even if it is also Arjun's (the faithful were bent on having that it was Romil's child till this was categorically clarified). It will never have the same kind of adoration and acceptance in this forum because it has made the mistake of not being born to Purvi. Curious, but true.

What I like very much about your whole approach is your lucid detachment about Arjun and Purvi - good if they get together, and good if they do not. Why on earth should they 'rot in hell', that too when real villains like Mittal and Punni thrive unscathed? They have both been very foolish, and I have long since lost my affectionate interest in them, but they are not wicked.

This is not to say that even good people cannot cause a huge amount of collateral damage, as has happened with Onir, but then he brought a lot of it on himself, by indulging his Mishti's every whim.

However, I would have wanted Purvi to display much more faith in the man who had treated her like the apple of his eye for so long. Not to believe the worst of him just because he says so. Why does she not call Shambhu Dada or that friend of Onir's in Kolkatta to check up about this so-called first marriage? Or go to that Dr. Braganza, who knows Onir exceedingly well? It is unbelievable.What sort of trust is this, that assumes the worst so easily about a person one has lived with for a year and who has given one nothing but affection, extreme caring, and unquestioned support whatever the circumstances?

I am now convinced that Purvi does not deserve Onir and the sooner she goes back to Arjun the better all round. But then there will no more story left, which is a sobering thought, for that would seem to herald another leap, or rather stumble forward, of at least 18 years, till Ankita returns as Ovi's daughter!!😉

Finally, about that strange Madras HC ruling about any adult couple willingly indulging in intimate relations being treated as married, Of course it will be challenged in the Supreme Court and almost surely overruled, for it goes much too far. But look on the funny side of it, Take any average Casanova: he would end up with a roomful of 'wives;, and you can be sure all of them would be tearing each other's hair out!😉😉

Shyamala B.Cowsik

Originally posted by: sharadrocks



I perfectly understand where you are coming from, Mam! I have no quarrel with it! But since this forum is so obsessed with the Indian way of life and morality, my point simply was that, by that logic, the oldest child has greater rights as opposed to the others.Hence the Sri Ram logic. Even in modern day india, Mukesh Ambani has pretty much inherited his father's mantle

Of course, if the Arjun-Ovi baby turned out to be male, poor Pari might have to make way! Because our Indian code of conduct is after all so loaded in favour of the male! Anyway, i truly appreciate your stance that a child is a child irrespective of the marital status of its parents. It comes as a breath of fresh air in a space where the word 'najayaz' is flung so carelessly at Pari at every opportunity. A child is a life. How can it be illegitimate? At a time when we are looking to change laws, it is sad that people still entertain such archaic notions!


Originally posted by: sashashyam

Dear Sharad,

It seems that I did not make myself clear, so let me try again.


Edited by sashashyam - 12 years ago

Naysayer thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#43
@pallavi

Yep..it was Kasauti I think...never saw the show...but read about how ridiculous it was and took a peek subsequently on youtube...Ekta's predilection for triangles and squares and her penchant for breaking up lovers is both amusing and annoying..😊
Naysayer thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#44
@sashashyam

Ma'am, let me clarify at the outset. I am neither a fan of this show nor any of its actors, So, maintaining a semblance of objectivity is not too too much of an ask for me!

The show is a very badly written piece of crap, to be frank. But then, that is the lot of Indian TV currently, barring a few exceptions maybe. So, trying to justify any of these characters or their actions or spewing venom on them for their idiocies is, in my opinion, a wasteful exercise,

For me, this is a kind of literary analysis. Okay, so maybe this is not literature but it is still a work of fiction, As you are only too aware, such analysis does not involve sitting in judgment on characters and their actions. All it requires is making an attempt to understand the character' psyche, his or her motivations, triggers and so on. This is all I attempt to do whenever I make a post.

I have no respect for anybody who celebrates the death of a baby, be it real or fictitious. At the same time, I am also a pro-choice person. In this instance, Purvi chose to have her child. What happened thereafter is not the concern of this particular post. Given the choice that she made, nobody, and I repeat nobody, has the right to talk of the child as a symbol of her disgustingly low morals and so on. I am sorry to say I have seen numerous posts on this forum that have discussed the sexual behaviour of the characters at length and sat in judgment on them. At the risk of offending the high priestesses of morality on this forum, I do not believe that society has the right to tell me when and if I should sleep with a partner of my choice, I do not consider it a sin whether it happens before, after or in between marriages. All sex requires is consent. I don't think even the law deems it as illegal except where it involves soliciting, I think we may see a change in laws vis a vis that too soon. Even an extra marital affair is only grounds for an adultery suit. You cannot jail a man and his partner simply because they slept with each other, Coming to the show, why such hue and cry over consensual sex? Normally, I don't think your past history is any of your current partner's business except where there is threat of disease! But, in this case, maybe Arjun should have told Ovi that he was 'soiled goods' as I have heard him and Purvi described on the forum. Maybe then the stupid deal would not have gone through. But then again, maybe Ovi was so obsessed with Arjun that it would have made no difference to her!

Coming to Ovi's child, I am yet to come across a post which says that Ovi's child deserved to die or she deserved that. I am fairly new here and maybe I have missed these posts! All I have seen is posts that have pointed out that Ovi herself did not care for the child to begin with. She did everything within her power to destroy it before it was pointed out to her that the child could be some kind of super glue that would make Arjun stick to her. Subsequently, she went ahead with the pregnancy! So, it was not about wanting to love a baby or even enjoy the pleasures of motherhood. It was only because the child served her purpose. One cannot quarrel with these observations because they only describe what was shown! . But it certainly cannot be denied that, in time, she grew to love the child and hence her breakdown when she eventually found out that her child had died and Pari was not hers!

I would never wish the loss of a child on anyone. So, if somebody has done it or celebrated it, then it certainly cannot be condoned. However, by the same yardstick, wishing that a live human being would rot in hell or die simply because she is not as righteous as you are cannot be condoned either. I am not saying this justified that but simply that both are equally unjustifiable. Spewing venom on people, even if they are fictitious, is something that I am disturbed by! Because somewhere this tendency to sit in as judge and jury spills over into our real lives too! I made a post on this forum saying only this and I was called judgmental for my efforts🥱

Anyway, thanks for taking the time out to interact with me. Truly appreciate it 😃


P.S - with regard to the Madras HC ruling, it may well be struck down. However, it was a case specific judgment and not generic. And the intention of the court was to protect the children born out of that union. To prevent them being labelled as najayaz 🥱...to that extent, I hail the ruling...and wish that word would be labelled unacceptable...a union may not be considered legitimate but how can a child be that...how can life be held as illegitimate...with DNA analysis, parentage can be established too...as men like N.D.Tiwari are discovering to their dismay..


P.P.S - On what Arjun did or did not feel, I cannot comment since I did not watch the episode. I think it is very unfair to assume that a man would not mourn his child simply because it was not born to the woman he loved. It is equally a part of him after all! A lot of things do get left out of a twenty minute episode. Maybe the writers felt that showing Arjun having a breakdown just as Ovi did was not worthy of screen time. If they had felt that it would contribute to their story, they would have certainly done that. With regard to Ovi's baby being the darling of the forum, maybe we will see this come true when Ovi's baby will return eighteen years to take revenge...and then discover that it was her own mother who triggered off the whole mess..and then she will embrace both Purvi and Arjun and disown her mother just as Karan did in Kyunki Saas. Ekta has a predilection for turning children against their parents, you see 🥱
Edited by sharadrocks - 12 years ago
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#45
Dear Sharad,

I agree with you about Indian TV serials in general, and I have written on your Demons and Angels thread about the fate of the ones which dared to be sensible. So there is not much hope for the future either.

About PR, we seem to be moving on different tracks - you have not touched on the Purvi-Onir part of my post,for example, but that is ok, for one cannot go on and on about these things . I too enjoyed the exchanges with you. Only one thing: there were posts like that about Ovi's baby. I am not given to wild statements or to exaggeration, and I had in fact brought such hate posts to the attention of the mods, and was told that it was ok to want a character dead, unless you went into gory detail and described how you wanted him or her carved up, or boiled in oil. But it is not ok, as I discovered to my great amusement, to say that a character has a face like the backside of a bus.😉

As for Arjun, it would have looked better for his character if he had been shown openly mourning his dead child. They could have axed one of the stupid Teju-Sunny scenes for it if necessary. It was not a question of assuming anything, It was never shown, and so what is the audience supposed to think? Even about Pari, the change in his behaviour towards her as soon as he found out who her mother was, was very marked. Ovi remarked on it, and wondered about his becoming so emotional. There is a very definite bias there, perhaps natural, for after all, do parents not have their favourites among their own children? It is a myth that they always love all of them equally.

As for me, I am too old to be a fan of anybody, and I was pretty much the same even in the long gone days of my youth. But one does develop some involvement with individual characters, as I did at one time with Arjun and Purvi. If one has no attachment to any of them, why then should one watch the show at all? They are hardly entertaining!

Right now I am in switch off mode, and I hope I stay that way. Have fun while it lasts.

Shyamala B.Cowsik

PS: As for the Madras HC ruling, I do agree that the aim was good, but it is very liable to misuse, and is likely to create chaos all round. Even the abetment to suicide law is being misused to get any boyfriend who quarrelled with the suicidee arrested under that charge, as in the recent Jiah Khan case. The chaps get off eventually, but the trauma, the expense and the hassles they go thru are very hard on them. As for children born out of wedlock, the law, if I am not wrong, already gives them equal rights to a share in the inherited property, on par with the legitimate children (I use that word as the distinction had to be made).But social acceptance is something else, and neither you nor I will be able to change that any time soon.
PPS: Being in the happy position of not having seen any other Ekta serial, except Kasam Se for a while, I was not aware of what you have said about kids and their parents in Balaji serials, but I am sure you are right!

Originally posted by: sharadrocks

@sashashyam


Ma'am, let me clarify at the outset. I am neither a fan of this show nor any of its actors, So, maintaining a semblance of objectivity is not too too much of an ask for me!

The show is a very badly written piece of crap, to be frank. But then, that is the lot of Indian TV currently, barring a few exceptions maybe. So, trying to justify any of these characters or their actions or spewing venom on them for their idiocies is, in my opinion, a wasteful exercise,

For me, this is a kind of literary analysis. Okay, so maybe this is not literature but it is still a work of fiction, As you are only too aware, such analysis does not involve sitting in judgment on characters and their actions. All it requires is making an attempt to understand the character' psyche, his or her motivations, triggers and so on. This is all I attempt to do whenever I make a post.

I have no respect for anybody who celebrates the death on a baby, be it real or fictitious. At the same time, I am also a pro-choice person. In this instance, Purvi chose to have her child. What happened thereafter is not the concern of this particular post. Given the choice that she made, nobody, and I repeat nobody, has the right to talk of the child as a symbol of her disgustingly low morals and so on. I am sorry to say I have seen numerous posts on this forum that have discussed the sexual behaviour of the characters at length and sat in judgment on them. At the risk of offending the high priestesses of morality on this forum, I do not believe that society has the right to tell me when and if I should sleep with a partner of my choice, I do not consider it a sin whether it happens before, after or in between marriages. All sex requires is consent. I don't think even the law deems it as illegal except where it involves soliciting, I think we may see a change in laws vis a vis that too soon. Even an extra marital affair is only grounds for an adultery suit. You cannot jail a man and his partner simply because they slept with each other, Coming to the show, why such hue and cry over consensual sex? Normally, I don't think your past history is any business of your current partner except where there is threat of disease! But, in this case, maybe Arjun should have told Ovi that he was 'soiled goods' as I have heard him and Purvi described on the forum. Maybe then the stupid deal would not have gone through. But then again, maybe Ovi was so obsessed with Arjun that it would have made no difference to her!

Coming to Ovi's child, I am yet to come across a post which says that Ovi's child deserved to die or she deserved that. I am fairly new here and maybe I have missed these posts! All I have seen is posts that have pointed out that Ovi herself did not care for the child to begin with. She did everything within her power to destroy it before it was pointed out to her that the child could be some kind of super glue that would make Arjun stick to her. Subsequently, she went ahead with the pregnancy! So, it was not about wanting to love a baby or even enjoy the pleasures of motherhood. It was only because the child served her purpose. One cannot quarrel with these observations because they only describe what was shown! . But it certainly cannot be denied that, in time, she grew to love the child and hence her breakdown when she eventually found out that her child had died and Pari was not hers!

I would never wish the loss of a child on anyone. So, if somebody has done it or celebrated it, then it certainly cannot be condoned. However, by the same yardstick, wishing that a live human being would rot in hell or die simply because she is not as righteous as you are cannot be condoned either. I am not saying this justified that but simply that both are equally unjustifiable. Spewing venom on people, even if they are fictitious, is something that I am disturbed by! Because somewhere this tendency to sit in as judge and jury spills over into our real lives too! I made a post on this forum saying only this and I was called judgmental for my efforts🥱

Anyway, thanks for taking the time out to interact with me. Truly appreciate it 😃


P.S - with regard to the Madras HC ruling, it may well be struck down. However, it was a case specific judgment and not generic. And the intention of the court was to protect the children born out of that union. To prevent them being labelled as najayaz 🥱...to that extent, I hail the ruling...and wish that word would be labelled unacceptable...a union may not be considered legitimate but how can a child be that...how can life be held as illegitimate...with DNA analysis, parentage can be established too...as men like N.D.Tiwari are discovering to their dismay..


P.P.S - On what Arjun did or did not feel, I cannot comment since I did not watch the episode. I think it is very unfair to assume that a man would not mourn his child simply because it was not born to the woman he loved. It is equally a part of him after all! A lot of things do get left out of a twenty minute episode. May the writers felt that showing Arjun having a breakdown just as Ovi did was not worthy of screen time. If they had felt that it would contribute to their story, they certainly would have done that. With regard to Ovi's baby being the darling of the forum, maybe we will see this come true when Ovi's baby will return eighteen years to take revenge...and then discover that it was her own mother who triggered off the whole mess..and then she will embrace both Purvi and Arjun and disown her mother just as Karan did in Kyunki Saas. Ekta has a predilection for turning children against their parents, you see 🥱

Edited by sashashyam - 12 years ago
Naysayer thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#46
@sashashyam

Of course one tends to invest emotionally in one or the other character. How else do you get involved in the story? And you make a little extra effort to understand the point of view of that character.

However, that does not blind you to all reason. It is like being a good parent! You love your kids to bits but are not blind to their faults 😆

On Onir, let me just say that I don't comment on saints 😆...Purvi showed signs of being a mere mortal when she fell in love, went ahead with her marriage plans despite knowing that Arjun had been engaged to her foster sister, breastfed Pari and then admonished Ovi for not taking good care of her. Even recently, when she took off on Onir for his alleged betrayal, it was very real. I do not subscribe to the theory that you do not have the right to feel betrayed just because someone has been very good to you in the past. She was reacting to a certain truth which made her feel that she was completely wrong in her estimation of Onir. Anger is natural when you have elevated a man to saintly status only to discover that he has feet of clay. That you are not an angel is irrelevant here! I am not saying she is right or wrong. Merely that I understand where she is coming from! She could have waited for an explanation at the very least but then, Ekta's women are not exactly the reasonable sort!

Onir has now risen so high in the saint league that one cannot possibly dare to examine or understand him 🥱
Edited by sharadrocks - 12 years ago
sashashyam thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#47

Dear Sharad,

Your tongue is obviously firmly in your cheek, but I don't see Onir as a saint, you know, except perhaps for his devoting himself to providing free medical care for the poor. I am a retired Indian diplomat, and when I was our Ambassador to the Philippines about 18 years ago, I knew their Health Minister, Dr, Juan Flavier,who was exactly like Onir in this respect. He had worked all his life in the slums of Manila and in the small villages nearby. Plus he was the most human saint one could imagine, with a pronounced ability to laugh at himself.

To revert, I see Onir as a realist. He had no idea of falling in love for quite a while, but then he fell for Purvi literally at first sight. He is very astute in the way in which he brings her round to marrying him, and I mean this as a compliment, for he is totally sincere, He does not put the least pressure on her in any way simply because he loves her more than he loves himself, and that kind of forbearance comes more easily to him than to most men as he is so generous and giving in general. A Friday's child, without the shadow of a doubt!

Now, apart from the acute frustration of being cut off from the profession that was his passion, and being subjected to constant vilification whenever he goes out, which must be horrible, he is getting weary of watching his wife and the other man. I cannot think of a single normal husband who would tolerate the kind of interaction between his wife and her ex-lover that Onir does. That part is saintly, if you like! I would call it folly, for it does none of the three any good.

Not being a deluded fool, Onir realises that he will never get from his wife what she shares with Arjun. The jealousy he displays during that rain scene in front of the hospital is real, I think, though it also fits into his scheme of pushing Purvi away from himself and back into what he thinks would be good for her and her child.

I do not think that he would, like Archana and Purvi, see this as a tyaag, but as the most practical solution to their problems. If Onir and Purvi had stayed on in Kolkatta, he would have had Pari as his own daughter, his wife might have in due course forgotten Arjun (yes, one can and does forget one's first love, and this can be total) and grown to love him, differently from what she felt for Arjun but still deeply and sincerely. Like Marianne Dashwood and Colonel Brandon in Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility. But she is so obstinate about Ovi's treatment that she forces him to come to Mumbai by running away there herself. From then on, with the reappearance of Arjun in Purvi's life, the downwards slide in their relationship has started, though it is not evident till much longer.

Onir being a surgeon, he probably believes that excising a decayed limb is good for the body as a whole. So he thinks it best to move out, in the belief that Purvi will now go back to Arjun. Once you concede this, the rest, of making Purvi detest him. follows, and it is SOP in Indian films. It is also perhaps necessary, for Purvi's sense of self would never have let her do that without all this nautanki. Onir is a much stronger character than Arjun, and once he went away, he would never have looked back or vacillated.

I personally think he is better off without Purvi, given all that has happened by now. He deserves better, for one thing. What I never could understand is the degree of stoicism he displays after being banished from his profession ( after a court procedure that was a worse farce than the norm). This is really hard to believe, especially when he gets neither concern nor moral support from his wife, who is bothered only about her baby and her mother. What happens to Onir is the sort of thing that can destroy a man, but he soldiers on, without the least trace of self pity. Most men would crack up with frustration, and would take it out at home, becoming very hard to live with.

As for Purvi, she seems to have no clue as to what a man like him, with a reputation like his, in a situation like the one he has ended up in thanks to their combined folly, would feel. That too is incredible for me. She is self-centred about her parivaar, but so self-centred?

Lastly, about the real parts in Purvi. After she is confronted with the situation of being the other woman, what I blame her for is not checking with people in Kolkatta, Shambu Dada or Onir's friend, or that Dr, Bhargava. I would have thought that a Nosy Parker like Purvi, so adept at ferreting our Punni's secrets, could have tried her hand at this quite successfully, but she does not even think about it. Strange.

Lastly, while I do believe that Onir is best off without Purvi, I am not sure what is going to happen. As I wrote elsewhere, I have a sneaking suspicion that by now, she is nowhere near as involved with Arjun as Onir imagines, and much more affected by Onir's 'betrayal' than would be warranted by mere anger. She also misses their life together and remembers all his kindness and affection towards her, something that I had not expected. If she ever finds out about this hoodwinking exercise, she will go back to Onir like a shot, and not just out of a feeling of guilt.

I seem to be falling into my old habit of endless argument back and forth, thanks to the quality of your analysis, which is fresh and appealing. But enough is enough, and I will cry halt here, before your eyes glaze over!

Shyamala B.Cowsik

Originally posted by: sharadrocks

@sashashyam


Of course one tends to invest emotionally in one or the other character. How else do you get involved in the story? And you make a little extra effort to understand the point of view of that character.

However, that does not blind you to all reason. It is like being a good parent! You love your kids to bits but are not blind to their faults 😆

On Onir, let me just say that I don't comment on saints 😆...Purvi showed signs of being a mere mortal when she fell in love, went ahead with her marriage plans despite knowing that Arjun had been engaged to her foster sister, breastfed Pari and then admonished Ovi for not taking good care of her. Even recently, when she took off on Onir for his alleged betrayal, it was very real. I do not subscribe to the theory that you do not have the right to feel betrayed just because someone has been very good to you in the past. She was reacting to a certain truth which made her feel that she was completely wrong in her estimation of Onir. Anger is natural when you have elevated a man to saintly status only to discover that he has feet of clay. That you are not an angel is irrelevant here! I am not saying she is right or wrong. Merely that I understand where she is coming from! She could have waited for an explanation at the very least but then, Ekta's women are not exactly the reasonable sort!

Onir has now risen so high in the saint league that one cannot possibly dare to examine or understand him 🥱

Edited by sashashyam - 12 years ago
trinichick thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#48

Originally posted by: shk281

If Ovi got pregnant with AK then I doubt she would keep the baby. She didn't want the baby the first time as it would keep her from modeling which was her passion and its all that she has now. The only reason she kept the first baby was to get Arjun's love and now she doesn't want Arjun so why would she want his baby? So that shouldn't be a problem for ArVi and Pari :)

And Ovi has nooo problem with abortion, nso there will be no problem!

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".