Posted:
Originally posted by: vaishali-AR
Arshi, when I said maan maryada I referred to the ''sneaking up in the night part'' not her dress.. I don't know too much about village dress codes but I know that backless cholis are not very uncommon in Gujrat rural areas.. the garba dresses the young girls wear in navratras are inspired by the local village chaniya choli looks only..And skin show happens in all traditional Indian dresses, whether its a saree or ghagra cholis..the midriff and backs are exposed ..the transparent duppattas are only to make the attire look dressy.. and she looks pretty..the leads should look like leads when they come in one frame.. usme kya logic yaar?! Talking to opposite sex speaking out by women may have been looked down upon 50 years ago.. its honestly not that big a deal now..it might not be very open like in villages..but its not shocking or a social taboo as it used to be.. What I would consider against maan maryada is what Kumari is doing..
Very true Vaishali, leads should look like leads, and elegant dressing is a part of it,
Village dress, since we have different experiences on this , lets leave it out for now.
My crib is only against inconsistencies.
Let me try to explain
Actually rural India is what I said in point 3 - a mix of modern and old
So there are belts which are progressive and some which are still very traditional,
SLB just has to choose which type of village he wants to base his story in.
A modern village would allow its heroine to dress this way, but since liberty to dress is one of the last liberties a society concedes to a woman, it would not freak out on a girl and boy out etc etc.
A rigid society on the other hand, would object to gau hatya, girl and boy going out together, and would also have rigid dress rules.
SLB just needs to be consistent, if it is a liberal village, then Gau Hatya and other conservative village tracks should not have been written and vice versa!
Cricket
Kumkum Bhagya
Tum Se Tum Tak
Sampoorna
Jhanak
