(In)compatibility - Page 4

Originally posted by: sonyjknum

Wow Mudra ji,great post ,ab kya karein,time hi aisa aa gaya hai,compatibility ke bina toh kuch bhi nahin ho sakta par yeh milta kahan hai,mujhe bhi batao,humari haalat toh induction stove aur steel wali hai😆😆😆

Originally posted by: kritika4ever

Enjoyed your post Mudraswathiji. So funny 😆
The windows-Linux part is the best!

Originally posted by: mudraswathi

Which compiler? how did you make compatible.. interesting.. could you please give more details?

Originally posted by: vidyasabde

it was a bouncer to me...am small na ! read it 2-3 times to understand...now i can say it was good one.

Originally posted by: deepali.rock

there is this compiler, DEV C/C++...arre it was actually nothing...my lappy was 32 bit...and compiler supported 64 bit...it took me 2 days to understand the reason😆...then i read the online manual available...altered some settings accordingly...and finally it was compatible with my lappy

Originally posted by: mudraswathi

oh!! it happens always!!!😆

will it effect the cache? just curious..😳

Originally posted by: mudraswathi

Originally posted by: deepali.rock

i dont think so...bcoz its just adapting to settings, inorder to be compatible...it isn't changing the base storage/memory... although not sure abt it, will confirm once...never thought abt it before, u gave an interesting ques..