Is actor great or Charcter!

Since Anjum , playing Gauri was leaving the show .. the CVS got all messed up. Now they are showing the wrong message ...

Originally posted by: disha123

Even if Actor leaves the serial.. it is the charcter that the we the audiuence like .. there are so many serials where an new actor has been replaced and the audience have accepted them too .

Her Gauri was such a pivotal role and all of sudden with no proper closer the character was dumped. Now, after what J shared with Gauri ... the CVS are showing as if all is easered in a min .. Ja is hopeless and the CVS are making him more spineless.

He did the same thing to Gauri what he did to An. He left An for Ga and then again left Ga for An and Family. IF he has released his mistake and bad behaviour with An then he should release the same for Ga too ...

CVS please note that we except this serial to have real good moral value. You have alway given a GOOD message to the people ... please do not break it just because an actor has left the show.

Please note that audience understand that actors to are human, if they move on in life and leave thier 'JOB', the JOB should be given to a different actor.

WE SEE THE SERIAL FOR THE CHARCTERS NOT THE ACTORS. We like the actors for the charcters they play !!!

i completely agree with you but i want anjum to return to bv ,may be there is hope let cvs continue this ganga track for time being.

I think cvs waiting for Anjum's return.

i think same that cvs r waiting for anjum return...hatts of to them that they have given too much importance to anjum that there is no replacement of her

Originally posted by: mocking_bird

Characters are remembered if actors are great. If actors portray the characters properly,then we tend to remember the characters.

That is why,whenever a film is made,actors are chosen very carefully who can do justice to the characters. how many times we have seen a movie and debated who could have done the role better than the actor who actually played it? Do not we do that?

I differ a little here ... for me it is the stroy and the character which i remember ... but then again hasnt anjum told that she will not be returning soon .. her hubby is in navy right and she will be joining him ... so why wait ... take the care of ever popular mihir of (K series) he was replaced by Ronit Roy and it took little time but eventually audience accepted Ronit Roy as Mihir ...

I agree with you. Sriti even looks a bit like Anjuum, and she could've been a fine replacement. It's annoying because they have explanations for every side to minor character's absence - Sumitra, Daddu, Shyam-Sugna, but not Jagdish's wife who was the cause of so much trouble? All those days of love just disappear? Plus, I was never satisfied with Jagdish's putting all the blame on Gauri. HE was the one who started things with her knowing he already had a wife, not she. She didn't even know he was married. HE begged her to stay with him and that he loved her even after she wanted to leave him on finding out he was married, not she. He was selfish and lazy, and she put up with his nonsense, so he couldn't put up with some of her selfishness? Letting the man go scot-free and rushing to forgive him, even when he's accepting rightful blame for himself - all of this is just promoting ugly patriarchal values of the supremacy of men and the downgrading of women. Maybe that's not what they're going for and the reason behind it is simply technical issues like problems with the actors, but the effect is the same.

Originally posted by: mocking_bird

Characters are remembered if actors are great. If actors portray the characters properly,then we tend to remember the characters.

That is why,whenever a film is made,actors are chosen very carefully who can do justice to the characters. how many times we have seen a movie and debated who could have done the role better than the actor who actually played it? Do not we do that?

Originally posted by: mocking_bird

Characters are remembered if actors are great. If actors portray the characters properly,then we tend to remember the characters.

That is why,whenever a film is made,actors are chosen very carefully who can do justice to the characters. how many times we have seen a movie and debated who could have done the role better than the actor who actually played it? Do not we do that?