Why do we take sides? - Page 4

Originally posted by: rabzonedge

Great post Sujhatha..actually it becums difficult to be neutral always..but i have been neutral fan of KTLK...it happens mostly when you love an artiste more so the character he plays u becum biased for him..this is Fanhood..an pure emotions...so we behave as per our choice...

Originally posted by: SHIKHA19

no offence but donno sujatha y u always see a negative side of viewers but here ppl r to discuss both good n bad side of a show ...if we like smthn we r the first one who speak out loud about our show's good performance ...why dont u notice that ?

n if we talk about bad things or saying smthn wrong to cvs its only n only for the betterment of the show ...nothing personal ...

arent we get scolded at home for doing wrong things ?

loving smthn is one thing but to be blind is another . n at the end its each to its own .

Originally posted by: OneWish

Great post and Follow-up Sujata Ji. I think we take sides because we care for these characters and the forum presents us with a platform to express ourselves. We've attached ourselves so to them that when we see them about to fall we can't help but try and save them.

Having said that, I love KTLK, and would would never wish ill on it. Conversely, I would be miserable if it was no longer on.

Originally posted by: Sujatha.rao

]

Divya...I have nothing against fanhood and emotions...but usage of polite and decent language in criticism is all I request...when language becomes very harsh and bitter, the whole atmosphere gets vitiated...that is all I am saying!

Originally posted by: Sujatha.rao

Radhika, you have clearly not got the essence of what I am saying. I am the last person to interfere in personal forum. But democracy also implies restraint in the language used. Whether it is against an individual or even the show or the creatives. I think the same pov can be expressed using temperate language. This is all I said and all I meant. And am sorry if you find that in bad taste but I stand by what I said!

Btw, sychopancy is neither required nor encouraged so far as I know. Don't know from where you got the idea! Since when did being polite and couteous even in expressing dissent become sycophancy?

Originally posted by: radhika72

ThanK you . While I appreciate your feelings and concern I personally feel it is not my job to advice somebody in a public forum . What is in my control is I can avoid that post. While I love and admire many of your posts I wanted to share my opinion taking this opportunity as this is not the first time such an issue is raised. If no criticism then it should be sycophancy na. where a person hides his/ her true feelings but say what will not create problem. in sugar coated words. I also stand by what I say.

Originally posted by: Sujatha.rao

Shikha...I am equally respectful of the right of the viewer to offer feedback as you are...however, temperate language can be used still...I don't think there is any harm in asking for that...

And yes, each to his pov...if you can say that the show is dead, I guess I can ask people to be temperate too!

Originally posted by: SHIKHA19

absolutely ...u can say anythn ...full freedom ...but its like i will never teach people ..nor i m some mahan guru who will start giving lectures here that how to talk n what to talk etc .

everybody has brains here ...

its a common place where any1 can say anythn ..if u like it ..attend it or if u dont then ignore it ..simple .

so many times there r lots of things ppl say which i dont like but i never interfere into it ..as its their way to say things ..n if i dont like it then its my problem not their .