Manav-Arjun-Purvi - Page 3

Originally posted by: archverma10

Thanks Jyothi!! 😉 I totally agree with all you have said...only thing is...you really think Manav wont come around and accept Purvi fully? I think he may. Echoes of the past come to mind...when he said to Archana that you should marry the person you are in love with. I really think that Arjun getting shot may help him come around. I think he also doubts Arjun's intentions...remember what he said when he was busy slapping him around that day? He said "why didnt you tell me? I could have pacified her somehow and done something had I known early on but how come things went so far? You got engaged in front of everyone!" I think he truly doubted Arjun's intentions...was convinced that he was some kind of playboy. Realizing just how much Purvi means to Arjun will make him realize that they truly are in love...and it is the real thing. I truly think he was only seeing things from Ovi's point of view and her pain...Im hoping this helps the blinders come off.

Originally posted by: archverma10

Well, I have to say that there is no doubt that Manav and Archana in particular, are truly acting like distraught and worried parents here. Even though Manav is downplaying the depth of his feeling for Purvi, from the written update (have yet to watch the epi so bear wtih me here), he does not allow DK to relieve him of the responsibility and take the easy way out...although stepping aside to defer to DK and Arjun, under the circumstances (considering Purvi is about to be his bahu) would have been perfectly acceptable and put him back in Ovi's good books.

I also see another angle to Arjun getting shot. It may bring Manav and Purvi closer and change the whole equation. Arjun getting shot, seeing Purvi's cry of anguish and grief when he does, and Arjun's anxiety over Purvi will make Manav realize some harsh truths. Purvi did not steal Arjun from Ovi or do any dhoka...Arjun never loved Ovi like this...and even Manav cannot deny it. He saw Arjun's behavior in Canada...and watched Arjun/Ovi's friendship as they grew up. There is no way he can deny that while Arjun may have agreed to get engaged to her, this type of all-consuming, depth of feeling was never there. I have a feeling this set up is a good thing...and him getting shot...will drive home the point to Manav of what is right and what is wrong...what is true and what is not. I feel like the temple conversation between him and Ovi had a lot of subtle meaning. He clearly told Ovi he has to be with Purvi in this...and Ovi uttered those words...sense of foreboding "in that case baba you have lost me forever".

So sadly, Manav and Archana ended up with 2 kids that have exhibited an inherent lack of morality and basic humanity

1) Ovi (not even having the compassion to realize Purvi's life and honor were at stake...a beautiful young girl in the hands of 4 goons is every parents worst nightmare...given that it could have been herself...she is still unable to exhibit even an iota of humanity. More than sadness and grief...or even jealousy...but I get the funny feeling...that she no longer laments or longs for Arjun...hearing him talk to Purvi may have opened Pandora's box for her...so that all those vices...revenge, hatred, etc are going to be her agenda from now on.

2) To be honest I am not sold on Soham/Vishnu either. I think the fact that he shoots Arjun proves the point right there. Tomorrow's scene that was shown on SBS should confirm things here. He had Manav in front of him with a gun to his head. His original target was Manav and he had him as well as the money. What then was the need to shoot Arjun if he is not so bad as we think? Why shoot at them like that at all? The fact is simple. Arjun was right...and just like the movie Ransom...Mel Gibson called it correctly there too. Once he had the $$ he had no intention of letting any of them leave the place----alive. I think he is very cold-blooded...and does have an obvious bond with and need for approval from Balan. I dont think any revelations about his birth and past are going to change that...I just dont see it. Its either the character or the situation. In his case, this is his character now. There are children of mob bosses and gangsters who turn out to be good, compassionate human beings...lacking the taste for bloodshed or aptitude for murder. So it doesnt matter how he was raised. If he had the basic, inherent character...he would be unable to be so ruthless or cold-blooded...irrespective of who his parents are and how he is raised.

Trish thank you so much dear! 😊 I remember that time too...during their breakup and engagement fiasco...it was a tough time and there were times when I was sweating bullets myself that perhaps I was wrong in what I thought the outcome would be!! You have no idea how much I breathed in relief that all turned out well and I didnt make a fool of myself after all!

Originally posted by: archverma10

Trish thank you so much dear! 😊 I remember that time too...during their breakup and engagement fiasco...it was a tough time and there were times when I was sweating bullets myself that perhaps I was wrong in what I thought the outcome would be!! You have no idea how much I breathed in relief that all turned out well and I didnt make a fool of myself after all!

Thanks Parmeswaran...appreciate the compliment and thanks to all of you for liking my analysis! (Makes me want to take over the helm from Shyamala and start subjecting you to the long daily posts and episode analyses Arch style 😉...except that it would be very tough shoes to fill to write on a caliber with Shyamala of course :))

Originally posted by: Axiom

Great minds sleuth alike Jyothi 😃

When I saw her come back alone for a second it crossed my mind that she took the kidnapper's phone number from Manav's phone and went out to make him a counter offer to off Purvi. She obviously didn't go home to change 😆