Kareena's Beauty Evolution 2001-2012

Page

Next Last

lentils

@lentils

Dazzler

Posted: 13 years ago

Kareena Kapoor (photo courtesy | Filmfare magazine)

Actresses may looks like pretty dolls onscreen, but off screen it's a whole different ballgame! Unflattering lipstick shades, wrong highlights, I could go on and on. WhenKareena Kapoor first stepped out into the limelight she was hardly the glamazon she is now. I decided to trace her beauty evolution…

2001

Kareena Kapoor in 2001 ( photo courtesy | KareenaK.com)

Kareena stepped out looking pasty and pallid. Guess lipstick and blush weren't in her dictionary just yet?

2004

Kareena Kapoor in 2004 (photo courtesy | KareenaK.com)

While she may have piled on the pounds, her beauty regiment remained almost the same, thankfully this time around she found some lipstick and mascara.

2005

Kareena Kapoor with blonde highlights (photo courtesy | onsugar.com)

I think this was her worst phase. The garish orange-y blonde highlights did absolutely nothing to enhance her natural beauty. And sadly she caught on to the dark lip-liner-light-lipstick phase. YUCK!

2008

Kareena Kapoor in 2008 (photo courtesy | Fairone.com)

Her image vastly improved in 2008. Her hair was sleeker. The tacky highlights were gone. Kaajal and shiny pink gloss became her signature look and the pale look was banished.

2012

Kareena Kapoor in 2012 (photos courtesy |filmsofindia and topnews.com)

Cut to present day. I think this is Kapoor's best beauty year to date, her skin is glowing. The bronzer is her new found best friend. She also switched it up with her hair – giving us variations at different events. Perfection.

Quote

Frequent Posters

KhatamKahani

@KhatamKahani

Stunner

Posted: 13 years ago

I think she is wearing lipstick here (left pic). I remember those types of shades back then. 😆 And she's obviously wearing lipstick in the right pic too. So I don't know why these two pics were chosen for the caption. 😕

As for the horrible highlights in 2005. Well by 2005 I think it had died out (but perhaps it was only just dying out in India?). But yeah the early 2000s were filled with horrible highlights. (This is not to say I don't agree that that phase was bad. I agree that was a horrible phase. But there was a time when that was 'in'--and it was simultaneous with the dark liner phase that's mentioned.)

That being said, I do think she carries off the non/minimal make-up up look quite well. If I had to choose her without make up and pale or her with harsh make-up as she still sometimes does, pale skinned Kareena any day.

I also don't get what the big deal is if she's pale.

Edited by likarsh - 13 years ago

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 13 years ago

You know what I've noticed?

Her appearance offscreen vastly improved with the entry of Saif Ali Khan into her life.

That's when she started really making an effort with what she wore.

Quote

Kal El

@Kal El

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Definitely improved with age/time.

Originally posted by: desigal90
You know what I've noticed?
Her appearance offscreen vastly improved with the entry of Saif Ali Khan into her life.
That's when she started really making an effort with what she wore.

Because size matters. 😉

Quote

753784

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

So now we know who is the boss here.

Saifu is😎

Quote

791198

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

Yup if that is what you call evolution, this is what you call devolution, my sweets. 😳

Quote

desigal90

@desigal90

Trailblazer

+ 5

Posted: 13 years ago

LOL Dex!

I can sense the pangs of pain in a trailer somewhere 😆

Quote

791198

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: desigal90
LOL Dex!
I can sense the pangs of pain in a trailer somewhere 😆

Yup. The e-torture tactic is working, I'm sure. 😆

Quote

Anamika

@.Anamika.

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 13 years ago

Originally posted by: Dexterkichokri.
Yup if that is what you call evolution, this is what you call devolution, my sweets. 😳

But how is that a fair comparison? Kareena hasn't given birth yet, nor is she as old as Aishwarya.

Quote

791198

Suspended

Posted: 13 years ago

#10

Originally posted by: .Anamika.

But how is that a fair comparison? Kareena hasn't given birth yet, nor is she as old as Aishwarya.

How is your argument any more valid than my comparison? Are you saying all new mothers devolve as bad as Aishwarya? If so, I can post pictures of celebrity moms on here that got back into shape as quick as possible and look the same as before.

That wasn't the point of my post though. The OP was talking about evolution. So I decided to show devolution, bollywood style. Complete Evolution lesson for everyone. Simple.

Edited by Dexterkichokri. - 13 years ago