I don't like pre-cap - Page 2

Originally posted by: Blondiexzy

Today episode was nice but the precap was sad I wish they didn't show this part in the Sati story as we all know the Yagna is coming soon so I was hoping for a little Shiv & Sati together time alone.

Originally posted by: kkr531

That's the point Sati testing Ram is medieval addition to story after there was surge in vaishnava
numbers in the middle ages.

Even Shiv Puran was tampered with.Shaiva and Shakt Tradition does not endorse this story this narrative is prevalent in Indo Gangetic plan and not in the South.

I did not expect this treatment when the serial is about adi shakti and shiv

regards
Krishna

lolz but this show is on shiva and shakthi , no one knows reall story of god and yesterday by rama track they mix vaishnavism also thats not fair b,coz rama is always worshiping lord shica , and another thing by this precap all intrest in this show is lost ,all will laugh if someone will tell that lord rama is aradhya of shiva no one knows reall fact got so they havent shown this type of precap or sad ending ,in every story there is differnt kind of satis ending but the show is on lord shiva not on any other god , srry plz dnt mind even my kuldevtha is laxmi ravalnath but a big devotee of ishwara ( shiva and shakthi ) ,yesterday in show they shown supremacy of devi shakthi again they change the track and shown about rama the show is on lord shiva so this is not right ,they didnt think what will be the reaction of audience on this precap

Originally posted by: payalibm

krishna ji your all problem will be solved if you go and read valmiki ji ramayan...then you will yourself will come out of all this vaishnava n shrudhaa n south n north n tulisdas n other ppl who interfare

in original ramayan evry thing tht happened has a significane with proof of y n how n wht happened with all d sources gvin in detials to find out..the time u will read u will never wana read other ramayan...😊and enough proof their ke sati did tuk the test of raam ji...v.less ppl know this story n signficance was to let shivji give a way to stay away from sati mata so that he dont have to mate with her as she still not complete in addee shakt form,n till that dosent happen sati is not capable to take his maan hood n bear his child

well your answer lies in the name shiv ling.😊

I have read Valmiki Ramayan. This story is not there in Valmiki Ramayan but it is there in Tulsidas Ramcharitmanas.

Originally posted by: payalibm

krishna ji your all problem will be solved if you go and read valmiki ji ramayan...then you will yourself will come out of all this vaishnava n shrudhaa n south n north n tulisdas n other ppl who interfare

in original ramayan evry thing tht happened has a significane with proof of y n how n wht happened with all d sources gvin in detials to find out..the time u will read u will never wana read other ramayan...😊and enough proof their ke sati did tuk the test of raam ji...v.less ppl know this story n signficance was to let shivji give a way to stay away from sati mata so that he dont have to mate with her as she still not complete in addee shakt form,n till that dosent happen sati is not capable to take his maan hood n bear his child

well your answer lies in the name shiv ling.😊

there is no proof what so ever for sati mata coming and testing Shree Ram as i told you it is later addition these things happen due to one devotee of god considering his god as superior
tulsidas ji may write whatever whatever he wants, we don't agree about his justification.

Lord Shiva who is mahakaal and eternal meditating on time limited Human incarnation of Vishnu for eternity is laughable. even in philosophical point of view vaishanva traditions of vishistadvaitha
and dvaitha are diametrically opposite to shaiva traditions of Shaiva Siddhantha ,Shiva Advaitha
and advaitha. so to say Shivji meditates on Shree Ram is no way justifiable.


for example there is a story of sarabeshwara chastising Lord Narasimha after the killing of Hiranyakashap. vaishnava versions don't agree with that



so the point is time and again this things happen due to inherent egos of human beings so when they present in vaishnava perspect they can show that.

but when you are showing a mytho which is mostly shiva centric such depictions will be downright illogical and doesn't serve any purpose

Originally posted by: kkr531

there is no proof what so ever for sati mata coming and testing Shree Ram as i told you it is later addition these things happen due to one devotee of god considering his god as superior
tulsidas ji may write whatever whatever he wants, we don't agree about his justification.

Lord Shiva who is mahakaal and eternal meditating on time limited Human incarnation of Vishnu for eternity is laughable. even in philosophical point of view vaishanva traditions of vishistadvaitha
and dvaitha are diametrically opposite to shaiva traditions of Shaiva Siddhantha ,Shiva Advaitha
and advaitha. so to say Shivji meditates on Shree Ram is no way justifiable.


for example there is a story of sarabeshwara chastising Lord Narasimha after the killing of Hiranyakashap. vaishnava versions don't agree with that



so the point is time and again this things happen due to inherent egos of human beings so when they present in vaishnava perspect they can show that.

but when you are showing a mytho which is mostly shiva centric such depictions will be downright illogical and doesn't serve any purpose

Originally posted by: Mia.spark17

@shreya..hehe..the 7th point really makes u think..quite an observation..good job!

Originally posted by: payalibm

hey!can i ask u some thin...dont mind..y have you bound your self to some cast or tradition or being vaishav n all(no insult or any type of intention)...and feel tht its the version...do u read early vedic time and later vedic time...u will come to know lots of things...read it...it will help you come out of this thing being vashav n all r any oparticular cast thinkin of puran or epics...plzzz i m nto insulting you or your cast or theri is anything bad in my mind..i simply want u to understan as a techer of history kee god cant eb bound to one cast or relign they are much beyond the reach of tht...and when you read early vedic time and la8r vedic period of india it will help you broden you mind and thinkin..no offences plzzz...n m sowie if i said anything wrong

i have read them i have read extensively on evolution and stratification of Indian Deities. its not the caste thinking its the difference in philosophy,Hindusim has many schools of thought.

Vaishnava traditions differ fundamentally with shaiva tradition on nature of god and the nature human relation ship with god. Both are incompatible in reality believe me Adi shankaracharya was openly refuted by ramanujacharya does that mean both are caste limited and narrow minded.

each of them had their own justification for superiority and both may be equally valid according to one's own perception.

My point here is when you are dealing with one line of narration do not mix it up with other line which is not compatible because that doesn't serve any purpose it is as simple as that.

for me its not acceptable because my aaradhya is Shiv and i dont subscribe to vaishnava traditions on this subject. its not about caste or tradition.

if you are okay with the portrayal its your choice and similarly i can have my opinion so so others in the forum.Every one's opinion is as valid as others as long as it has some reasonable logic

regards
Krishna

After thinking a lot, if this happens then, I am truly sure that now Mata Sati was fully awakened that who is she.