I don't like pre-cap

Well, I knew that they might show that Sati and Shiv visiting future, But there are many questions that are roaming in my head. Can anybody could explain this?

Well, this precise storyline about Sati going in disguise as Sita wasn't an invention of the CV's (as it has been mentioned for several times here at the forum, this story is given in some puranas). What concerns me, I also dislike this version, but anyway,this is more logical and traditional turn comparing to Vijaya appearance or Tarkasurs havin boon to early, or not finished Nanda vrat.

Originally posted by: Sweet24

Well, I knew that they might show that Sati and Shiv visiting future, But there are many questions that are roaming in my head. Can anybody could explain this?

1) Mata Sita always prays to Mata Gauri and Shiv. If Shivji doesn't have problem in this, why he would have problem in Sati taking form of Sita?

2)Mahadev is a trikaldarshi, he knows the future that what will happen next? so why did he Marry Sati if he wanted to leave her?

3)Well Sati being Ayogya is described in only this show?

4) Its true fact that Mahadev has made an ideal to Lord Ram, 7 incarnation of Vishnu. It is also true that Lord Ram's ideal is Shivji. There is a dedication relation between the two, So why are they involving women's in that?

5)It is said that All devis are the form of Aadya Shakti, that's why she is called Brahmani, Rudrani and Kamalarani.

"sarv mangal magalye shiv sarvath saadhike

sharanne trambake gauri

narayani namostute"

Narayani is Narayan's Shakti, Gauri is Shiv Shakti. They are all one.

6)It is also said that, Brahma, Vishnu and Shiv are also one. So what is the meaning of this?

7)In only in beginning Lakshmi has also taken the form of Sati, So, Vishnuji doesn't have problem in this?

8)If Shivji had leave Mata Sati, Why would he get affected when she leaves her body, that he got so angry and hurt? Since we don't have interest in the things which we left?

9) And After Sati had gone, why Shivji go in deep meditation?

10) Why Shivji is there with Mata Sati, in form of Bhairav, in all Shakti Pitas? Why?

11)There is so much co-incidence in the names of both Sati and Sita in both Hindi and Engilsh?

In Engish just replace I letter and in Hindi just replace E maatra.

That's the point Sati testing Ram is medieval addition to story after there was surge in vaishnava
numbers in the middle ages.

Even Shiv Puran was tampered with.Shaiva and Shakt Tradition does not endorse this story this narrative is prevalent in Indo Gangetic plan and not in the South.

I did not expect this treatment when the serial is about adi shakti and shiv

regards
Krishna

Well dear,only God can answer most of ur questions and not we humans.😆regarding ur qn.abt mahadev's reaction after sati's death,well,u very know how much shiv loved sati.even after his separtion frm aadi shakti and becoming a bairagi,he didn't stop loving her.In one of da episodes(after deir marriage)shiv had told sati dat he always loved her.So even after sati made dis 'mistake'of taking sita's disguise also he still loved her so dat's why he behaved like dat.

Originally posted by: payalibm

its a story,,,,,in shot tiem they will be abck again,when u will watch the tiem parvatiji will born it will be awsome,to get them to be one you need to see tht story n to c tht u need to let sati go...if this ppl show the coorect thing it was too fun when parvatiji mom saw shivji 1st time n all..shivji marrige tiem is v.hillarious story and full of fun and comeplete mesmrizing...satiji part is not even 1% of wht it will eb with parvatiji so.drling w8 till then dont loose your hope or u wont be able to see tht mesmarizing thing

Originally posted by: TOTAL-ROMANTIC

oh I am not going anywhere..I knwo Parvati stuff will be awesoem too..after all its Shakti maa.. coming back to her form,..but I only wish ki Mouni plays the role desperately yaar..😍

1) Shri Ram is Later Avatar of Vishnu necessitated by shraap of Jay and Vijay door keepers of vaikunta by sanatkumaras

2) In the historical context Shri Ram was a Human King who was later identified as Vishnu's avatar
as his following grew due to his noble qualities

3) Puranic literarture has been tampered heavily in the medieval period by Vaishnava Bhakti tradition it is this tradition which also identifies Hanuman Ji with Shivji in order to prove superiority of Vishnu over Shiva

4) People also should note that due to parvati's curse Ram had to suffer the separation from Sita


from above it is quite obvious that the story is concocted by some influential vaishnava who tampered with even Shiv puran, if you read shiv puran the thing is mentioned suddenly and there is no context for that mentioning that clearly proves that it is later addition.

i strongly suspect tulsidas ji as he was the person who propagated the view that hanumanji is rudravatar.

Southern traditions do not accept this version,

i have no problem if it shown that way in ramayan or some vishnu centric mytho but if they are showing mahadev's story they should show what shaivas and shaktas want to see and not some vaishnava version.

so cheer up guys you can safely turn off the TV up till yagnya time and assume that the thing never happened as it did not happen.

Shri Ram being araadhya of Shiv is as laughable, sorry guys if i sound some what arrogant .
as i will not accept some fringe stories with respect my aaradhyas

Maa Sati and Param Pita Parameshwar

Today episode was nice but the precap was sad I wish they didn't show this part in the Sati story as we all know the Yagna is coming soon so I was hoping for a little Shiv & Sati together time alone.