Posted:
It is one thing to be "mahaan" but another thing to be an "enabler". Archana is an enabler. She uses her so called goodness to enable those who take advantage of her to keep on doing so. I don't know about the Hindu religion but in Christianity, we are told to forgive those who have harmed us as the Lord forgives us for our sins; HOWEVER, we are then warned to stay away from that person in the future. I don't have a problem with her mahanta if she is forgiving those who have harmed her. But she does not learn any lessons for herself as she keeps getting in to the same situations over and over again. God allows bad things to happen to us so that we can come out stronger and smarter. Archu apparently has not learned this. 😕
Savita - Archu on numerous occasions allowed her MIL to abuse Archu both physically and emotionally. If she told her husband the truth, the abuse would have stopped long ago. Instead, Archu feels the need to hide all this from her own husband, the one person you are so connected to that you are supposed to tell him your deepest secrets.
Varsha - Archu enable Varsha to be the wild child she became before her wedding to Satish; not to mention the fiasco with Soham🤢! She fulfilled Varsha's selfish demands as her "sisterly duty". I'm sorry, but as the older sister, she had the responsibility to teach her younger sister how things are done.
Mother - Archu has allowed her own mother to control her life even AFTER getting married. A woman has a higher responsibility to her husband than her own family after being married. I am in no way suggesting ignoring your family/mother and her advice but Archu should have allowed Manav to have some say in her decisions
Sachin - Archu is allowing her adopted son to manipulate her to get his way. Did she once question his motives or reasoning behind his demands? No, instead like Varsha, she is giving in to his demands. Except she is the mother who has a responsibility to her son to ensure he is on the right path.
Manav - Archu allows Manav to verbally abuse her day in and day out while she happily cooks, cleans, and makes his home. Let's say she wants to portray herself as the greedy woman she has been allowed to be painted as. She should be able to speak her mind against him without guilt as this is her "new" image and will only help in enabling Sachin to get what he wants. On the other hand, even if she did not want to portray herself as the greedy woman, she still has the right to speak against a husband and demand that he respect her as a person/wife as long as they are married.
What are your thoughts? Is she justified in her actions? Or is everyone else at fault? 😊
Savita - Archu on numerous occasions allowed her MIL to abuse Archu both physically and emotionally. If she told her husband the truth, the abuse would have stopped long ago. Instead, Archu feels the need to hide all this from her own husband, the one person you are so connected to that you are supposed to tell him your deepest secrets.
Varsha - Archu enable Varsha to be the wild child she became before her wedding to Satish; not to mention the fiasco with Soham🤢! She fulfilled Varsha's selfish demands as her "sisterly duty". I'm sorry, but as the older sister, she had the responsibility to teach her younger sister how things are done.
Mother - Archu has allowed her own mother to control her life even AFTER getting married. A woman has a higher responsibility to her husband than her own family after being married. I am in no way suggesting ignoring your family/mother and her advice but Archu should have allowed Manav to have some say in her decisions
Sachin - Archu is allowing her adopted son to manipulate her to get his way. Did she once question his motives or reasoning behind his demands? No, instead like Varsha, she is giving in to his demands. Except she is the mother who has a responsibility to her son to ensure he is on the right path.
Manav - Archu allows Manav to verbally abuse her day in and day out while she happily cooks, cleans, and makes his home. Let's say she wants to portray herself as the greedy woman she has been allowed to be painted as. She should be able to speak her mind against him without guilt as this is her "new" image and will only help in enabling Sachin to get what he wants. On the other hand, even if she did not want to portray herself as the greedy woman, she still has the right to speak against a husband and demand that he respect her as a person/wife as long as they are married.
What are your thoughts? Is she justified in her actions? Or is everyone else at fault? 😊
Anupamaa
Sports
