RIGHT PARTNER 13.3
I don't get the hype around Dhurandhar Returns
RISTA PAKKA 14.3
Karan Nandini issue
IPL 2026 Schedule - Phase 1, Matches List
Teaser - 'Main Vaapas Aaunga' - Sharwari, Vedang & Diljit (Imtiyaz Ali
Happy Birthday Aamir Khan 🎊💐🎊
Happy Birthday Aamir Khan
Originally posted by: aishi.muffin
I agree that South films need to more religion friendly. I don't like the anti messages they spread.
However, being from a traditional Hindu family, I know that relgion mixed marriages aren't supported and actually looked down upon. And South India is still very Hindu pro (I mean the country is generally Hindu), so when the director is Hindu they show Hindu Gods before they take it so the movie becomes a success. I don't think they mean to offend anyone by depicting Hinduism. I don't find anything wrong with it either. When they look down upon other relgions, then I don't like it (: I do agree with you that they need to depict some other relgions in them at least sometimes.
Originally posted by: avivakirk
Are u a Muslim?
Probably the genre is limited but they were few movies like Bombay, YMC, Vedam etc.. which managed to make a mark... esp in Vedam the track of Manoj Bajpai was so touching...
Originally posted by: aishi.muffin
Actually I wanted to go back to the topic of Magadheera being anti - Muslim. I don't think it was trying to anti - Muslim actually. It's a historical fact on how some Muslim kings took over Rajput kingdoms at the start of the Mughal period in India. I am not trying to offend anyone here. Just stating a fact. And also, the Muslim king was a good character (eventually) in the film.
I'm not sure how many non-Hindus go to movies in South India, but I know my Muslim friend in Hyd watches them sometimes.I agree with chalhov that the directors don't want to take risks by changing the routine that has been there for so long. I do think that it wouldn't harm anyone if they showed more diversity though.
It wasn't anti-Muslim because it showed Muslim kings fighting and taking over Hindu kingdoms. It had obvious anti-Muslim messages because the Muslim King calls himself a "barbarian" and calls his special army (the 100 men he sent to fight the hero) " the Devil's army". Not only that, but when the Muslim King is reincarnated, he is a Christian, not a Muslim. So in the end, the Muslim was depicted as being evil.It may not be so obvious to those who don't think about it, but it's there. I was listening to a TV program the other day where Professors were talking about something called "subconscious influence." This is when messages are relayed to people and children who watch and listen to media, especially movies and cartoons.I think this is really scary because someone who watches Magadheera might at one point be faced with a situation where there is a Muslim-Hindu fight or rivalry and subconsciously will remember that Muslims are "evil" and "barbarian."Do you see what I mean?I'm not talking about the history part, of course the history is there and it's nice to show history in movies. But when people start making generalizations or when hatred or annoyance of a particular group starts accumulating in the society, it will show up somewhere sometime in negative ways.These movies have a much bigger influence on society than we realize.
Hello Everyone We all love watching movies. Aren't we ? This thread to post about d last south movie you watched be it in theater , Tv or any of...
983