Originally posted by: abhijit shukla
Al right here are my two cents.
The issue for Gujarat starts with man whose name the Dam carries...ever since Sardar Patel was slighted by Gandhiji in favor of Nehru...Gujarat has suffered from the step-child complex. Many in Gujarat including myself believe that Sardar would have been much better leader to start out the nation with; he would have solved many problems Nehru left behind and not created the ones Nehru did. My father has told me all my life that most people in India wanted Sardar as the prime minister and Gandhiji single handedly imposed Nehru because he did not wish to look partial to a fellow Gujarati.
Come 1960, the Bombay state was split against most of Gujju people's wish and Gujarat became politically weaker.
This about same time Narmada dispute started brewing. I am not exactly sure of the time. It was before my birth.
Come 1978, Gujjus finally think that their lost chance to glory was returned to them when Morarji Desai became the PM - 19 months later who other than Nehru's Daughter in her shameless quest for power plays with a politically Charansingh's greed and topples an otherwise well running government.
Then comes the well publicized Hajira-Mathura pipeline. It sounded quite couner-intuitive to drain crude oil through 3 states from its origin to refine it - not to mention potentially destroying one of the 'Seven Wonders' of the world - India's signature structure. Gujjus felt that they were slighted again of an economic benefit of a refinery.
Remember Narmada is being pushed back time again all through this. Gujju's felt times and again that they were pushed around to pamper states with more parliamentary seats. UP, MP, Maharashtra. How legit that anger was, I don't know. I was only a child through all this. Of course, that was then, it should not be an issue now.
Enter first Baba Amte, then Megha Patkar, then Arundhati Roy and then the Bollywood Boy Amir Khan. You see - each player in this sequence is getting less and less authentic and more and more vain.
So take the step-child complex, take the obstructionist political game playing of 40 year and then add perception of celebrities as vain, self absorbed people for whom any morcha is just another opportunity for camera time -and you will see why Gujjus are - correctly or incorrectly taking it out on Amir. Every celebrity that finds a cause to demonstrate his/her social conscience is always a suspect - at least for a couple of years. Be it Bono, Bradjelina, Shabana Azmi, Arundhati Roy or Amir...and rightly so. People always want to see if lasts any longer than Kavya Vishwanathan's literary career. Another thing that goes against Amir in Gujarat is that the perception that he has done less than he could have for the villages in Kutch after the earth-quake although 'Lagaan' - his crowning achievement was shot there. (Personally I don't think he had an obligation to do anything.)
Again when people profess to believe in something, it is fully legit to test them and see what they are willing to lose for what they believe in. I can not say that an official Ban on all Amir movies if fair or even legal but let us see if Amir Khan believs in the issue strongly enough to let go Gujarati share of his viewer ship - yes voluntary boycott is fully legit.
I have never seen the Adivasis in MP who are displaced but I spent my formative years in Saurashtra and Kutch. I have seen thirst, I have seen hunger, I have seen starvation - emaciated legs below protruding bellies under well carved out rib cages. I have seen farms totally barren in the middle of monsoon. Those things are just as real as the displacement of others. I have not heard during my lifetime Megha Patkar of Baba Amte coming to Western Gujarat and addressing the reality of thirst. May be I missed them.
What I fail to understand is why is it that all the organizations like Megha Patkar's fail to make a catalogue of people who need to be rehabilitated. They could not be more than what a city like Amdavad grows annually - I fail to see how with all the land that is claimed to stand well irrigated, those many people if well documented, can not be given their due.
Another thing I don't understand is how Narmada is unique! There are many dams in world taller and bigger than Sardar Sarovar. Three Gorges on Yangtze started only 13 years ago and looks like it will be finished before Sardar sarovar. No one is protesting in CHINA against that. OK, leave comminsts aside. I have never heard displacement and environment squabbles about Krishna, Kaveri, Bhakra Nangal, Rogun, or Hoover. Why is that?
My knowledge on the subject is not that of an environmental, humanitarian or geologic expert but that of an average Joe and most of the points I am making are intuitive. I will stand corrected if anyone has facts contradictory to my believes. I tried to read Arundhati Roy's Article on the issue but see seemed more intent on showcasing her own literary skills than portraying the plight of people. She lost me after 15 pages of babble.
Abhijit, that is really a wonderful reply. 👏
China's (and World's) biggest dam has been completed in 13 years, aur hum log wahin ke wahin, hum log nahin sudhrenge...one problem with us is that we think too much, plan too much and do very less actual work...and there are always people ready "taang adaane ke liye".😡
https://www.waterpowermagazine.com/story.asp?sectionCode=130& amp;storyCode=2036296
|
| 24 May 2006 |