I don't get the hype around Dhurandhar Returns
RISTA PAKKA 14.3
TRUST NAHII15.3
Dhurandhar 3
Sabse accha biological bacha kaun?
RGV Says Industry Is Jealous Of Yami And Aditya Dhar
Aamir Khan Finalizes Two Scripts
Happy Birthday Aamir Khan
Anu good theory of Krishna and RaDev...The Bhagvad Geeta was based on Arjun's refusal to lift weapon against Bhisma Pita, his Guru, and his cousins in Kuruchetra. Arjun couldn't decide if it was okay for him to fight his own people That's when Krishna show his mighty avatar to Arjun and narrate the entire geeta. He also said to Arjun that people who support lies or adharma are as much guilty as the one who commited the sin. the mahabharat wouldn't exist if Arjun raised question against his eldest brother during the gambling and vastraharan of Draupadi or Bhisma Pita and Guru Dronacharya stopped the Duryodhan for conspiring against pandava. Krishna does come to help his devotee if they are really helpless like Draupadi was during vastraharan.In this case, Radhika and Dev were not helpless but confused to fight against the elders like Daimaa and Dadaji. Radhika needed someone to explain to her the dharma, Kartavya, and her karma for his first marriage and society. we didn't see divine intervention of Kanha instead we had to deal with Barkha's lies to Radhika, Dev, and Dadaji. well Kanha stopped the adharma through barkha but it's high time that Radhika understand her Dharma otherwise we are up for Mahabharat and Ramayan combined in CB Land. I feel Radhika, Dev, Dadaji, and Barkha are responsible for this mess but again who am I to judge...The Mahabharata and Krishna concept is very complex and comparing cb is not worthed. CB doesn't even come close to Krishna's concept...It's sad that every single Indian soap use the name of God for the monetary gain. I am getting headache from the twist and turns of Choti bahu.
nice post...Originally posted by: -Shankar-
Krishna had once said (I think, not so sure, correct me if I am wrong) that if a lie can save a life it is better than a 1000 truths. Barkha saved her life, Dev's life, and Rad's life (even though she lost DDji's life in the process)You are right Shankar.. i heard of it too many times ...also there is another saying "if the truth can give pain/hurt anyone, then don't say it...
Originally posted by: -Shankar-
I mostly agree but strongly disagree that Barkha is completely wrong.
Dont hit me with ur chappals! đ¤ŁIf Barkha had refused to marry Dev:DDji would have found any 'fit' suitor for Dev and do the shaddi.Is Barkha married Dev:Well, she would have been married to Dev, not radhika.Krishna had once said (I think, not so sure, correct me if I am wrong) that if a lie can save a life it is better than a 1000 truths. Barkha saved her life, Dev's life, and Rad's life (even though she lost DDji's life in the process)Barkha is not at full fault. Her and RaDev share equal blame. Barkha was right. If Dev was truly in love w/ Rad, he would have moved heaven n' earth to get her but no, he waited for Rad to give her consent. Now, i think he realized his mistake because he said he was glad Barkha lied and got RaDev married. So we should not blame Barkha here. If she were not in the story, RaDev would still be running from Rohan. So please, show some gratitude for the person who saved Dev and got RaDev married.yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanam srjamy ahamwhenever there is a decline in dharma, then God will come in some form.Well, Kanha came as Barkha. I agree that Barkha isn't God and shouldn't pretend she is but God helps those who help themselves. And since radev were not helping themselves, barkha lent a helping hand to retain, as the Buddha would say, "dharma"