Archana Discussion post! - why was it closed down?

pallai thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#1
hello Mods,
I dnt understand what u thought wld get out of hand in that post... i thought all were having peaceful discussions whats wrong with that? there was no name calling or anything? was any member directly affected? or calling archana shameless was the problem...
if any particular post was bad u cld have just edited that post.. wats with closing down a whole thread....i had just typed a whole long post .. and i lost it .. cos the topic got closed...and i cannt type else where cos the continuation is broken...

Tomorrow...If a topic called "manjusha/Dharmesh is shameless" is opened am sure no one would find THAT offensive.. why bcos they are bad charcters and archana is the lead? and she cannot be called names although some viewers might find it otherwise?

if u found the subject offensive you could have just Pmed me and asked me to change it...

if u read through the whole thread i had also mentioned that when i saw the episode i felt it was shameful on archana's part to hold vaishu's hand after all that she went through that why the shameless word... i was ready to change it too.

this is so not done.

so I was right .. any anti archana post will never be encouraged in this forum?

usually i wld have Pmed about this .. but since you didnt feel the need to PM about i thought i wld rather make it a post.

thanks!



Created

Last reply

Replies

45

Views

4.3k

Users

18

Likes

143

Frequent Posters

Dabulls23 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#2
Pallai I was about to PM mods just to check why the topic was closed. But glad you made a topic.
I am wondering the same why anti Archana topics always end up being closed. There was not any argument, fight or even bashing. In that topic everyone was discussing Archana characters behavior which is so wrong. The actions Archana character takes were wrong. Why close the topic?
Don't we have our first amendment right of freedom of speech w/o attacking anyone? Everyone was calm and discussing it properly. I feel opposite views are made to be supressed or not allowed period. Is ZEE paying IF to only promote who they want to? Archana character meaning Ankita Lokhande?
So make it clear that PR section is only to write in Ankita's favor or Archana the character's favor and nothing else will be allowed. So we will get the clear msg and move on.
But here in IF it is a false pretence of every one is entitled to have an opinion but in reality it is not.
Thanks for reading. I would strongly request mods to reconsider opening up that topic for further discussion about a character's behavior..
Pranjjal thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#3
It is disgusting to close the topics. Pallai's discussion has a validity in it.
Are these forums to write only sweet sweet 😲
It is about the character seriously Archana's character when it comes with manav seems childlish. Woman should take care of whether others are respecting her hubby(if she claims that she loves him most) or not evenif they are her blood relativies. Pallai had all valid points.
I think there is no point in writing anything here if it is closed like this
Edited by Pranjjal - 14 years ago
pallai thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#4
thanks varsha for your reply...

what i fail to understand is PR forum's IF rules.. what is name calling? are there some specific words, phrases which when used becomes name calling?

just last week when manav gng away track was gng on. there were numerous posts calling manav "unfair","coward","quitter" so are these not name calling?
why where those posts allowed to continue?

my complaint is if u felt the word in the subject line was harsh then you cld have Pmed me adn asked me to change it. I would have definately done so, my post is not intended to bash archana/ankita...

but rather what faults i see in her character.. and wat i wld want Cvs to change abt that.. i feel ramdonly closing down posts without even bothering to go thru the whole post or contact the orginal poster is bordering on dictactorship and doesnt encourage lively healthy discussions.

In my stint at IF i have personally taken care never to abuse any member or character unnecessarily. i thought at least the Mods owed this much to sort it out with me before closing the thread...

I had typed a whole post and wasnt able to post it cos the thread got closed without any warning.

please enforce the same rules for all posts.. if archana cannot be called names.. than manav shouldnt be called "quitter", savita "queen" , varsha "brat"..

MOTHERHOOD thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#5
A healthy discussion was going on.But in every forum anti lead topics get closed.
Pranjjal thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#6
Shameless is not an unparliamentary word.
Dabulls23 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 14 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: JONAKIHATESYOU

A healthy discussion was going on.But in every forum anti lead topics get closed.

That also Selective leads 😳 not both
pallai thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: JONAKIHATESYOU

A healthy discussion was going on.But in every forum anti lead topics get closed.


Jonaki
I agree i have seen that trend but usually wat mods do is they put a warning ( they mention page numbers of the warning ) , they can also change the subject line itself.. or atleast please contact the topic opener and discuss what u thought was wrong..

why should we even write here then?.. we see the serial and spend hours discussing.. for what that ur topic gets closed cos ur called the lead "names".
MOTHERHOOD thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#9
Yesit seems weird that post got closed before giving any warnings.Normally 3 warnings are given.
pallai thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 14 years ago
#10
Shameless is not an unparliamentary word.[/QUOTE

yes.. wat i had meant was archana went to help those who had deserted her when she needed them the most.. that way she has no shame or self respect.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".