Horrible Woman !!! - Page 5

I am seriously worried for SRKluvr and co. Because they are professing a ruinous value system - one that celebrates evil and evilness, and, worse, upholds social inequality. I can understand admiration for Rashmi's acting prowess; i can understand that people think she is beautiful. But please separate the character she plays from the real person she is. Commend Rashmi not Tapu. What is the case of Tapu fans? That a naukrani ki beti should be condemned forever? That the line separting the working class and the malik class should never be crossed? What if Tapasya had had a sibling? Would she have still ranted that her parents shared their love with the other child? Her point is that her parents loved a naukarani's daughter -- this is open advocacy of birth-based discrimination. Agreed in practice, Indian society does practise discrimination against the working class. But can one celebrate this practice? Is this not the equivalent Americans openly advocating racism? Would anyone accept that?

Originally posted by: vidyasu1

<font size="4">I am seriously worried for SRKluvr and co. Because they are professing a ruinous value system - one that celebrates evil and evilness, and, worse, upholds social inequality. I can understand admiration for Rashmi's acting prowess; i can understand that people think she is beautiful. But please separate the character she plays from the real person she is. Commend Rashmi not Tapu. What is the case of Tapu fans? That a naukrani ki beti should be condemned forever? That theline separting the working class and the malik class should never be crossed? What if Tapasya had had a sibling? Would she have still ranted that her parents shared their love with the other child? Her point is that her parents loved a naukarani's daughter -- this is open advocacy of birth-based discrimination. Agreed in practice, Indian society does practise discrimination against the working class. But can one celebrate this practice? Is this notthe equivalent Americans openly advocating racism? Would anyone accept that?</font>

<font size="4">Is it Tapu fan club's case that Tapu must have the freedom in all situations. When she rejects Veer, Ichcha must accept it. When she wants Veer, he must be given back. When despite all this Ichcha tries to find some happiness by agreeing to marry a drug addict -- whom no else will touch -- Tapu should have the freedom to destroy that happiness. Even kill Ichcha. It is Ichcha's fault that she did not die. Tapu must also have the right to egg on Ichcha's husband to suicide. If anyone protests, she willswear revenge. Tapu must have the unqualified right to murder, cheat, rob at all times.If this right is not given, she will hit back, cry and turn the tableson her victims by accusing them of discrimination. It is disturbing thata character of this kind has got a cult following.</font>

<font size="4">I do not mean to offend anyone on the forum but seriously advise a rethink.</font>

Originally posted by: vidyasu1

I am seriously worried for SRKluvr and co. Because they are professing a ruinous value system - one that celebrates evil and evilness, and, worse, upholds social inequality. I can understand admiration for Rashmi's acting prowess; i can understand that people think she is beautiful. But please separate the character she plays from the real person she is. Commend Rashmi not Tapu. What is the case of Tapu fans? That a naukrani ki beti should be condemned forever? That the line separting the working class and the malik class should never be crossed? What if Tapasya had had a sibling? Would she have still ranted that her parents shared their love with the other child? Her point is that her parents loved a naukarani's daughter -- this is open advocacy of birth-based discrimination. Agreed in practice, Indian society does practise discrimination against the working class. But can one celebrate this practice? Is this not the equivalent Americans openly advocating racism? Would anyone accept that?

Is it Tapu fan club's case that Tapu must have the freedom in all situations. When she rejects Veer, Ichcha must accept it. When she wants Veer, he must be given back. When despite all this Ichcha tries to find some happiness by agreeing to marry a drug addict -- whom no else will touch -- Tapu should have the freedom to destroy that happiness. Even kill Ichcha. It is Ichcha's fault that she did not die. Tapu must also have the right to egg on Ichcha's husband to suicide. If anyone protests, she will swear revenge. Tapu must have the unqualified right to murder, cheat, rob at all times. If this right is not given, she will hit back, cry and turn the tables on her victims by accusing them of discrimination. It is disturbing that a character of this kind has got a cult following.

I do not mean to offend anyone on the forum but seriously advise a rethink.