Krishna must change to win Prat's love? - Page 9

Originally posted by: NZ_rockx

^^^OMG...r u reallii serious 👏...ok ...u knw wat...i was juzz trying to be nice...and making a point that plzz dont make such big arguments..dont have fites....but u knw wat am i doing...Pathar se apna sar maar rahi hoon...no i dont have much energy and patience left....and yahan par mera koi aisa frend bhi nahi..jiss ko main abhi bula sakoon to support me....aap logon ko kuch samajh nahi aanewaala..so keep having fun...arguing..😉

Originally posted by: ania_91

😆😆😆

Hello Limits!

Thats true.....I especially hate it when Shaym jee cries....Naina jee does it, it seems justified....you know about her "bond" with glycerine, right? 😆 Just give all them chai supply forever and you shall see no one crying....Chai ka Kamaaal! 😆

Originally posted by: limits

😆😆😆U better not be pulling my leg!!! K-words in hindi - doesnt nything come to ur mind??? Well, wat I read was 'kaminee' and the hindi of the feminine gender of a dog 😆, aka b****!!!😡

Understand about ur bussiness with work... Will be waiting to read ur comments!!! So u can take ur time!😉

You r right Ania!!! U know, reading all the serious comments makes me really want to hate Krishna as well coz they r bang on RIGHT!!! BUT I find it quite unbelievable that how can someone, esp. girls, call Pratigya such nasty words when all her behaviors ARE merely her reactions to Krishna's forceful actions!!! And after reading such comments, it gives me the feeling that the future of girls are soo hopeless!!!

Originally posted by: limits

You r right Ania!!! U know, reading all the serious comments makes me really want to hate Krishna as well coz they r bang on RIGHT!!! BUT I find it quite unbelievable that how can someone, esp. girls, call Pratigya such nasty words when all her behaviors ARE merely her reactions to Krishna's forceful actions!!! And after reading such comments, it gives me the feeling that the future of girls are soo hopeless!!!

BUT ThAnX for reminding me that this is a serial just for the sake of entertainment - which keeps me loving Krishna and expecting him to be a better person 😉; no matter how much the CVs want to show the real-life situations of girls who were eave-teased, I think just making a unique character like Krishna ruined those other good-intentions !!!😊 PS: BTW, do u think my comments are really the serious type??? Just curious! 😃

Originally posted by: MERARAI

When you love someone unconditionally you forgive easily. A mother forgives her children's mistakes however big easily bec' there is unconditional love.

Krishna actually explained to her he gets jealous when someone else touches her. Then he says he forgave her and ready to move on. Good for him.

We heard Krishna tell Amma "mai sub ko chod saktha hoon, lekin Pratigyaji ko nahin chodoonga" (a raw and emotional moment, brilliant performance). Once Krishna gets past his anger and hurt at her rejection he will let himself express his love again.

What I don't get is how a woman goes from hating him and promises to hate him forever and take the marriage as an opportunity to teach him a few (or many, who's keeping count) lessons? They say there is thin veil that separates hate and love. So if Krishna changes and asks for forgiveness and that makes her feel good that she got him to be the way she would approve of then she is ready to love? But then is that really love? That in my book is pure and simple AN EGO TRIP. Love with conditions is not real love by any means. So when does her love for Krishna translate to unconditional love? Whaever said and done, his past will always be a part of him in the present and future? Can she really accept all of it without reservations? With that acceptance comes forgiveness. If she does then that's true love.

Originally posted by: MERARAI

I've read several posts here about how Krishna MUST first change and become a better person deserving of Pratigya before she can or should fall in love with him. Let's take a look how we live in the real world...............that is depicted in fiction as well.

As a parent, do we tell a child, you behave well, do well in school first, then I will love you?
Do we tell our spouses, first be a good husband/wife, keep me happy, then I will love you?
Do we tell our friends, first be who I approve of all/most the time, then I will love you?

Doesn't it work the other way round? Love is unconditional by his very nature. We love our children, and that love and caring allows the child to learn to behave well with parental guidance. When teachers care, students are motivated to do better.

Little things that a bf/gf or a spouse does for their partner is appreciated and makes their feelings for each other grow into a deeper understanding and loving each other. The same is true for friends. Some relationships start off as friendships which later blossoms into a more intimate one.

So how come Krishna has to change first to win Prats's love? Krishna, the man-child has some mature moments in his life. He has shown sound logic on several occasions. He has shown he wants to change bec' he loves Pratigya. His methods are not the best but he has tried in ways he knew how to express that love given his personality, upbringing and family (they do matter).

Prats on the other hand comes from an educated (which means looking at life with a broader perspective and reasoning) and sharif family. She has been nurtured and raised with love and shown right from wrong (which is questionable these days given how the Sucksenas are handling themselves). She even tells Adarsh that with love one can change a person. She is good at advicing her brother but doesn't listen to herself.

How does telling her husband she hates him, wants to teach him a lesson, get revenge for her family's humiliation make her life any better? When a child is punished they act out even more. When one blames or confronts a spouse without explanations things get worse. If a friend is accused without details, the friend doesn't return your calls or walks away.

Prats is approaching her relationship with Krishna in a ulta-seedha way. And we have all seen Krishna tell Amma, SS and Prats on several occasions to give it to him straight and stop the ulta-seedha talk. When AV simplified his advice about women Krishna got some of it.

Komal has started trying to understand what Adarsh is about (even if she is jealous of Rolly), which is a good place to start. Seems like Prats is the one who has to change her tactics to get this relationship back on track. Krishna gave it a try his way, but this man-child is lost at the moment about has backed off his efforts to win his wife's love.

Your thoughts?

Originally posted by: Herman_4u

yea, rite, but wat i'm saying is dat luv between a couple is rarely unconditional, because, obviously u'd expect something from the other partner, if he/she doesn't fulfill dese expectations, den u won't luv da person, dat's y we see a lot divorces.

i think only luv dat could be unconditional is luv betwen mother and a child. a mother often tries to hide their mistakes from others but on da other hand ur spouse usually pick on ur mistakes. my psych prof said dat my luv for my wife isn't unconditional, i expect her to be faithful to me and take care of kids etc etc, so luv we r talking about here is hardly unconditionally, usually in fantasies :)