So, again I feel pretty much like an outsider intruding here, but what to do, some fan girls are making my head go round and round. I post something at 3:55:11 and it gets reported at 3:55:12, but that's beside the matter. Among all of the forums, I would maintain my claim on this forum to be the most level headed with intellectual members, and fair moderators. With that being said, lets actually get to the point of this topic. Hah.
Ok, so from my observations and such, I came to a conclusion that a certain section is all gaga only over talent (and this includes me) whereas, a particular section is only about looks.
I am not going to be a saint and state that looks don't matter because Bollywood is the shallowest place on Earth where even beautiful girls undergo surgeries to look more beautiful. Too bad they screw themselves up without knowing.
So, what's more important to you? Looks or talent? How do you think Bollywood itself judges these stars? Do you think it's accurate for talent to be not recognized over something superficial such as looks? Do you think Katrina is British or Indian? (Kidding. It's a joke. Ignore.)
For example, as much as some members have PM'ed me with images of Katrina from the net, I am still not convinced about her acting skills. She may be beautiful, and even more so due to her fuller lips and chest, but I am bent on not including her in the 'actors' list. Same goes with almost 3/4 of these 'superstars.' *Rolls eyes.* Only Prateik Babbar is an exception who seems to be the savior.
Often times on topics, I find myself as well commenting just on the looks of actors, maybe because they haven't done substantial acting for me to even judge them. However, many fans just protect these stars with their fatty acids only because they tend to believe that their favorites are HAWT and GAWJUS. OMG!
Without further ado, do write your views with reasoning.
Current Affairs
19