Marking Scheme! - Page 3

Originally posted by: BlueSoul

There should be Standard Reasons for which marks should be deducted...like No-Sync, Missing-steps, No lip-Sync....etc etc......... Then cut 1-1 or may be 2-2 marks for these things. And if the contestant is repeating these same mistakes weeks after weeks...then this should be considered. And this rule should be applied to all the contestants not for some particular ones.

Or its better they should give particular marks for each thing. Like out of 10 ...2marks for choreography, 2 marks for lip-sync, 2 marks for expressions, 2 marks for costumes, 2 marks for sync. In that way if you're cutting marks for a particular reason you'll be fair with all contestants. And even we can point out that there was no lip-sync so cut his/her marks. Otherwise they just cut 5-10 marks for 1 particular thing (even if the whole performance was very good)...while forgiving the other if he/she forgets to do the same thing....which ends up with a huge difference of marks between the two and which is obviously not fair.

At the end of the day most of the ppl just look at the marks and not the performance.

In todays performance 2nd round...BB was not lip syncing.. no expressions....(im not talking about the 1st performance) Also BB n Sonia were not in sync....but he got marks approx same as HK...who did much better than BB.
Now what do we expect from judges?

A TIP
Marks can be awarded on these points.Criteria for Judging Performance

Composition /10

Presentation /10

Choreography /10

Understanding /10

Collaboration /10

Application /10

then they should award overall...

@ Lats55: The only reason to suggest such scheme is to make sure that the judges are fair to everyone.

hmm agree

Originally posted by: nandinidev

[STRONG]and yes, the tags are quitepointless, and getquite annoyingafter a point, since they seem to chase the bearer no matter what he/she does to overstep it, whether it's Gauhar not dancing well, or Karan actuallydancing well and earning his marks...Gauhargets low scoresfor two consecutive performances, and yet the tag of best dancer remains intact...no offense meant, just a factual instance...at the same time,Karan scores two 27s in a row, and yet still remains the guy who earns his position on the show solely on account of votes...intriguing, eh?

agree completely..if there are people who r voting based on the marks and the tags these people give, it does appear as if karan is there only because of his voting, which is unfair to a contestant..and gauhar, all the talk about being the best dancer..even in the vote appeal yesterday, she said she need to go to the final coz acc to saroj, there's no one like her..hello!! what have u done till today to live upto the tag of best dancer..her performances r ordinary, never any risks...man, r people so scared of her turning on the tap that they keep her happy with the best dancer tag?