GENDER BASED

Ya I think they should have like one boy and one girl winner. Cuz both have different potentials and styles of dancing. So it would be fair to choose one dancer from each gender. That way the audience won't get confused into voting as well. But some of the girls such as Sunita are worse than all of the boys so it doesn't seem fair for guys like Mayuresh to be out and Sunita to stay just because of the gender bias and the "no more girls should be voted out". I agree with you on the gender bias and the voting part but I think a show would only boys or only girls would be quite boring to watch. At least for me it would. Nice post though :)

Originally posted by: cute2stay

Ya I think they should have like one boy and one girl winner. Cuz both have different potentials and styles of dancing. So it would be fair to choose one dancer from each gender. That way the audience won't get confused into voting as well. But some of the girls such as Sunita are worse than all of the boys so it doesn't seem fair for guys like Mayuresh to be out and Sunita to stay just because of the gender bias and the "no more girls should be voted out". I agree with you on the gender bias and the voting part but I think a show would only boys or only girls would be quite boring to watch. At least for me it would. Nice post though :)

i agree with u completely

ya it cud have been one boy and one girl😕

Or they could just do voting for girls and boys separately. Even though it doesn't always seem fair when the boys are usually better, it still is the best way. I think So You Think You Can Dance eliminates one boy and one girl every week. I might be wrong.

^^^^^^^^ That is because SYTYCD has made couples as teams.


@Topic
I understand your points as to why they should do that but Isnt this Equality of opportunity all about , equal footing, equal parameters to judge them . Eliminating a guy when a girl clearly is getting less votes , Isnt that discriminaton on basis of sex too?

When a show loses a better constestant in favour of worse ones, simply because the better got less votes, we accept it. We complain and express disappointment but ultimately accept it. So why is a girl who is better than a boy getting less votes such a huge issue when the same case with a boy who is better than another boy is not

As long as they want to decide the winner through audience votes, we have to deal with it.


IMPO, it would be ethically wrong to give girls special treatment simply because audience didnt.

At the moment the only girl on par and better with some guys is Alisha and she is staying. Can u honestly say Rakhee, Khushboo, Sunita are even at par with most good male contestants on show? Only deserving female who didnt go at the right time was Vrushali and Bhawna (but she should have gone after Khushboo anyway)

Originally posted by: Ritika2025

^^^^^^^^ That is because SYTYCD has made couples as teams.


@Topic
I understand your points as to why they should do that but Isnt this Equality of opportunity all about , equal footing, equal parameters to judge them . Eliminating a guy when a girl clearly is getting less votes , Isnt that discriminaton on basis of sex too?

When a show loses a better constestant in favour of worse ones, simply because the better got less votes, we accept it. We complain and express disappointment but ultimately accept it. So why is a girl who is better than a boy getting less votes such a huge issue when the same case with a boy who is better than another boy is not

As long as they want to decide the winner through audience votes, we have to deal with it.


IMPO, it would be ethically wrong to give girls special treatment simply because audience didnt.

At the moment the only girl on par and better with some guys is Alisha and she is staying. Can u honestly say Rakhee, Khushboo, Sunita are even at par with most good male contestants on show? Only deserving female who didnt go at the right time was Vrushali and Bhawna (but she should have gone after Khushboo anyway)