wanna change something in Mahabharat? - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

17

Views

3.3k

Users

4

Likes

2

Frequent Posters

RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#11

Originally posted by: ght_3fr3

as i know karna stop shiri kishan from teling pandaves about him been their elder bothers , as he know that if pandaves know they will give him everythings inculde the histanpure & make him the king of histenapur soo with his owth which pandet him with duryoudhana, he should give histanpure kingshiop to him as he can say no to his friend, soo if shir krishan tell pandaves after karna death that will keep histanpure under youdushirter leadership ********************************************************** ether in last time of his life karna tougth what is best of histanpure & his bothers ************************************************ no matter what other said or will say i think karn become winner with his death , his death was tragic but, he was the really winner in this MB & real hero of MB *********************************************************

I always felt that there was no winner in the Mahabharat war, because even though they literally "won", the Pandavas had many losses. They lost every single one of their sons and relatives. Only they, Shri Krishna, Satyaki, and a handful of souldiers survived on their side.
While on the Kauravas side, nearly everyone also died, with only Ashwathama, Kripacharya, Kritavarma, and a handful of soldiers surviving.
Hence, dying a noble warrior's death would be considered "winning". In that chase, Bhishma, Karna, Abhimanyu, and Ghatotkacha were all winners, since they all died fighting, doing their duty and knowing they were going to die.
For me, the heros of Mahabharat were Shri Krishna, Yudhisthira, Arjuna, Bheema, Karna, Bhishma, Abhimanyu, and all of those people who died doing their duty.
Not counting Shri Krishna (who was the true hero of Mahabharat, because he gave us the Bhagavat-Gita), I don't think there was one singular hero, because many of those who died, died doing their duty and Dharma. Karna was no doubt a great warrior, and a great person, a daan-veer, but I equally revere Bhishma Pitamah, because he joined the Kauravas due to a vow also, and he helped the Pandavas by giving them the secret of his death.
Both Karna and Bhishma attained the heavenly regions, because both of them died ultimately helping the Pandavas; Karna by asking Shri Krishna not to tell the Pandavas his identity, and Bhishma Pitamah by telling the Pandavas the secret of his death.
RamKiSeeta thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Achiever Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 16 years ago
#12

Originally posted by: mohit_raja

karan was one of the bravest warriors and received one of the most noble death. he was really really a good person and doing favor for pandavas by saying to krishna " don't reveal the secret until his death" he rightly said that if he get the throne and he will give it to duryodhan and it will be an injustice to a throne. He knew Yudhishthir is the right person for hastinapur.....
Arjuna was a good warrior too but he never received the noble death karna received. when he was dying, krishna showed him his true form and gave moksha to him.
hail karna

Shri Krishna showed Arjuna his universal form in the Bhagavat-Gita, before the war started. And in the end of Mahabharat, all the Pandavas and Draupadi were merged into the Supreme Lord, Narayana, himself.
But you're right, Karna really really was a good person, who died doing his duty as a true elder brother to the Pandavas. He was one of those who received the most noble death in the Mahabharat War. He was also extremely lucky, because he died in the presence of Shri Krishna. One who dies in the presence of the Supreme Lord ultimately received moksha.
ght_3fr3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#13
who did the last ruite for karna as i am totally confusied same resourses said pandavs, same said shir kirshen other said duryoudhana, i am totally confisouced *******************
ght_3fr3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#14

Following the war, funeral rites were performed for all the fallen. Kunti then requests her sons to perform the rites for Karna as well. When they protest, saying he was a suta, she reveals the truth of his birth. The brothers are shocked to find they have committed fratricide. Yudhishtira in particular is furious with his mother, and curses all women to never be able to keep a secret from that point on.

After the 18 day Mahabharata war at Kurukshetra,Lord Krishna asks Arjuna to step down from his chariot.When Arjuna does so,Krishna then takes Arjuna some distance away from the chariot.Then he signals Lord Hanuman seated on the chariot to get up.The moment Lord Hanuman jumps off the chariot,Arjuna's horses are burnt alive and his chariot explodes into pieces.Seeing this,Arjuna is shocked.Krishna then tells him that the deadly astras of Drona,Karna and Ashwattama had bought about the destruction of Arjuna's horses and chariot.

Karna remains a tragic figure for millions of Hindus and Indians to this day. He remains a brave hero, a courageous spirit who braved impossible odds in his whole life, and died with terrific courage, valor and honor, to rise to immortality in fame. He is especially famous for his generosity. He is also an example of misjudgement and how that renders all the fine qualities of an individual futile.

[edit] Contrast with Arjuna

There are many parallels between Arjuna and Karna. Both were master archers, and competed for Draupadi's hand. A deeper connection lies in the fact that the two felt strong ties to the Kaurava side, both through friendship and through blood. Karna's ride with Krishna is very similar to the Sacred Bhagavad Gita, in which Krishna reminded Arjuna of his duty. Their decisions, along with the consequences to themselves and their families, are used to emphasize the importance of following duty, as Krishna expounded.

Karna serves as an excellent example of a gifted, generous,righteous and brave individual who was still doomed because of his loyalty towards the evil Duryodhana. Karna's affection for Duryodhana led him to, albeit unwillingly, assist his dear friend in all his immoral and unjust actions against the Pandavas. Karna was aware of Duryodhana's malicious plans against the Pandavas. Karna was also aware of his own imminent downfall for assisting the evil against the good. The blemish to his name is his treatment of Draupadi, and his role in the killing of the unarmed and outnumbered Abhimanyu. According to some interpretations of the Mahabharata, it was the latter deed that solidified Karna's status as a evil warrior in the war and gave Arjuna moral cover when killing him while he was unarmed.

Another parallel between Karna and Arjuna was that both possessed Pashupatastra.Even in the Mahabharata serial,it was shown that Lord Shiva while giving the Pashupatastra to Arjuna told him that Karna too possessed a similar Pashupatasthra.

Krinya thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 16 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: ght_3fr3

who did the last ruite for karna as i am totally confusied same resourses said pandavs, same said shir kirshen other said duryoudhana, i am totally confisouced *******************

According to BR Chopra's MB, it was Duryodhan...
Krinya thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 16 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: godisone

I always felt that there was no winner in the Mahabharat war, because even though they literally "won", the Pandavas had many losses. They lost every single one of their sons and relatives. Only they, Shri Krishna, Satyaki, and a handful of souldiers survived on their side.
While on the Kauravas side, nearly everyone also died, with only Ashwathama, Kripacharya, Kritavarma, and a handful of soldiers surviving.
Hence, dying a noble warrior's death would be considered "winning". In that chase, Bhishma, Karna, Abhimanyu, and Ghatotkacha were all winners, since they all died fighting, doing their duty and knowing they were going to die.
For me, the heros of Mahabharat were Shri Krishna, Yudhisthira, Arjuna, Bheema, Karna, Bhishma, Abhimanyu, and all of those people who died doing their duty.
Not counting Shri Krishna (who was the true hero of Mahabharat, because he gave us the Bhagavat-Gita), I don't think there was one singular hero, because many of those who died, died doing their duty and Dharma. Karna was no doubt a great warrior, and a great person, a daan-veer, but I equally revere Bhishma Pitamah, because he joined the Kauravas due to a vow also, and he helped the Pandavas by giving them the secret of his death.
Both Karna and Bhishma attained the heavenly regions, because both of them died ultimately helping the Pandavas; Karna by asking Shri Krishna not to tell the Pandavas his identity, and Bhishma Pitamah by telling the Pandavas the secret of his death.

I was watching Shri Krishna today..They showed the story of Barbareek who was Bheem's grandson..He got 3 weapons with tapasya and he had the boon that those 3 weapons can destroy anything and everything on this Earth..but his grandmother Hidimba took a promise from him that he will use these weapons only to protect the weaker or the losing side in any battle..Lord Krishna feared that he might fight against Pandavas and this could led to their destruction..Therefore he tricked him and made him use the 3 weapons and then cut his head..Later, he revealed that he wanted moksha and the only way he could have got it was to get killed by God himself..he expressed his desire to see the Mahabharat war..Lord Krishna then puts his head on the topmost mountain from where he could see the war..
When the war ended, pandavas and Lord Krishna went to him and asked him whose bravery and valour impressed him the most? Barbareek started laughing and said that he didn't see anybody's valour..because this was the fight of dharma against adharma..he said he could only see Shri Krishna's chakra killing everybody on the battlefield...Bheeshma was hit by Arjuna but Krishna's chakra was helping his arrows reach their aim!!! Everybody saw that Dhrishtadyun killed Drona but Krishna's chakra actually killed Drona along with Dhristadyun sword...Same way, when Arjuna killed Karna, the sudarshan chakra was with Arjuna's arrow..that's why Karna could be killed.....Barbareek said he saw all this from his divyadhrishti which nobody else could see...Barbareek also heard the Bhagwad Geeta from Krishna....
I think the crux of Mahabharat war lies in these words of Barbareek...everything is done by God, it happened because of his wish, it happened for good and it was meant to be that way!!
Charu
Krinya thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 16 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: godisone

You could be right, but what I'm thinking is that how would Karna be the King of Hastinapura? I mean, the people favored Yudhisthira over Dhritarastra, but he didn't become King because Dhritarastra was basically ruled by Duryodhana. If Karna had been known as the eldest Pandava, how would things have been different? Duryodhana would have despised Karna like he despised Yudhisthira, because there was a chance Karna would gain the throne instead of him.
Also, along with Karna, Duryodhana highly treasured Bhishma and Drona as equally capable warriors, so if Karna was known as a Pandava, Duryodhana might have belittled his strength like he did the other Pandavas'. He might have said that with Bhishma and Drona on his side, who could face him?
Interesting thoughts though...

Karna would have been the King of Hastinapur after Dhritrashtra..that is, if Kunti had revealed the truth...that's because the throne belonged to the elder brother only...Yudhistir would have never accepted the throne incase he knew Karna was his elder brother..we're taking a scenario where Kunti reveals the truth to the family after rang bhoomi ...People of Hastinapur had no problems with Dhritrashtra as a king bec. the affairs of Hastinapur were taken care of by Bheeshma and Krip and Vidur...I believe that Karna then would have been equally capable ruler as Yudhistir...and then would have his 5 brothers with him...
Even though Bheeshma and Drona were forced to fight for Duryodhan but they could have never killed the pandavas..that's because Bheeshma pitamah said this once that kurus and pandavas were his family and he could never kill anyone from his family.....It's noteable that Duryodhan had so much confidence in Karna that he WILL win the war for him!!
ght_3fr3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 16 years ago
#18
i know duryoudhana used karan for his own benift & was totally selfish, karna was pure in his friendship to duryoudhan from first day till his death, duryoudhana relized karna frinedshipe only after karna death , at the time he get to know karna reality ***********************************************************************

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".