I'm a very visual person, and extremes taken to show women's beauty and objectify "beauty" and "women" drive me nuts. It's done everywhere all over the world, in different ways.
So what does have to do with Vivaah? Well Trishna has always been the prettiest of the four, and yes, I expect to get many replies saying Tanya is. but continuing on....But Trishna was pretty and simple but not overly so.
Post-marriage, my goodness, what happened? I have Barbie, Indian-style. I know that in our culture women are expected to take it up a notch after marrying into a new family; she is a reflection of them and on them. When this expectation is mixed with a well off family, as in Trishna's case, it can either go well or very...very bad.
Trishna as I mentioned before was beautiful in her "relative" simplicity. Now, I really can't say that. What bothers me?
I don't know if I'm looking at the old Trishna, who may be self-obsessed, but is not overly so when it comes to her appearance. Her larger-than life personality is not overshadowed by clothes and hair and bling.
1. Those damn ringlets in her hair. Even in the morning, every day! Sometimes when I look at her hair, I am taken back to 1700 France where men wore unreasonably curly wigs and women wore up to 3 ft. long hairdos. I really want to introduce her to a hair straightener--I haven't used mine yet, but I think a person like her needs it more than me.
2. Her makeup is so in your face, so overdone. It's like a caricature of someone who really is fond of wearing make-up. Did she get it permanently put on, surgically speaking? Just kidding.
3. Once I manage to get past those curls and the full color palette that is her face, my eyes fall on the clothes. This is a show, and so you're going to see the heavy saris on a new bride. It's all about fashion, fashion, fashion. Remember, she reflects her in-laws' status and lifestyle.
So I get back to the frivolity of the topic. I think many of the married women on our forum can attest to that "expectation", "a married girl's passion to be beautiful for her husband and his family", or "pressure", or a husband picking out clothes that are more reflective of the people they run with in society. I don't know why I occasionally find this insulting. It objectifies women sometimes, and it's not the person you married that has his idea, it's a built-in part of families.
I myself became very aware of this after my marriage, even during the engagement. I know people whose in-laws are fine with them not helping with the household, so that they can look "like them" or "of their status" or "make them proud". I like to look good for myself first, then my husband. But I am not the type of person who goes to the salon to get my hair done for a distant family friend's child's wedding. I'd rather do the laundry...I'd rather sit down with a book. You know what I mean? From my personal experience, though, I've noticed that a good amount of the time, it's more important how you look in your new family vs. what you do for everyone. A shock for me, but hey everyone is different.
What do you think? Based on your experience or when you look at the world around you-- magazines, billboards, advertisements, TV shows, movies, internet.
I'm looking forward to reading your responses.
😆