Global Alert: US–Israel's Major Military Operations against Iran🔥#2 - Page 44

Originally posted by: IamRaj96

I kind of agree with all your points but i do believe that a vassal state iran would be very different from a vassal state pakistan. Imo iranian people are more educated, progressive and come from a rich historical background. Because of that, i believe a vassal state iran would focus more on development and progress.

On the other hand, india is one of the fastest growing economies in the world, so a vassal state iran would have no choice but to engage with india in trade and possibly build strategic alliances (since they will lose our on china they had to build strong ties with india for rapid development), so i dont think there would be a major impact on india - iran relations, whether iran becomes a vassal state or remains under its current regime. However, a weakened iran under its current regime would be more advantageous for india than a stronger iran under the same regime.

Also, for a vassal state iran, the USA’s priorities would be different compared to pakistan. Iran would likely be used to weaken china by taking away one of its key strategic partners and to gain greater control over middle eastern oil reserves and trade routes. Pakistan, on the other hand is used for different strategic purposes.

The USA uses different vassal states for different goals, pakistan is used in the context of india, Iran would be used against china and for control over middle eastern energy and trade routes, south korea and japan are used to keep north korea and china in check, EU is aligned against russia and taiwan plays a role in countering china and securing semiconductors. So, in the case of a vassal state Iran, the primary focus would not really be india.

@bold india is going to be market that foreign investors cant ignore if they want to grow in decade or two. Other countries will also have to look at india as an important trading partner. I completely agree with the lady in the clip, whether she is talking about india, china, south korea, taiwan or brazil.

https://x.com/i/status/2035044365513773306

Thats why i believe that even new vassal state like iran (if USA wins the war) would have to maintain good relations with india if it wants to develop and grow.

Ups... are this the illegal immigrants who want to spend abraod the dollars Trump gave them??? (well, no, I guess)

https://x.com/mattvanswol/status/2034980582824849587

Originally posted by: Cynical1

... As the British system develops cracks supporting the asylees that come and depend on social support , don’t work and pray on streets, the prince has finally spoken about the madness going on there

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MxFad6P4avE

Originally posted by: Cynical1

The “largely peaceful majority” keeps busy not being peaceful. Doesn’t it ?

Would you read it - to educate yourself?

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/

Although 10 years old... an excerpt

Originally posted by: Cynical1

...I wasn’t making stuff up. He speaks about the “largely peaceful majority” attending funerals of Islamic terrorists that apparently have no religion but do when it’s time for their funeral

Could well be that "the largely peaceful majority" want to assure themselves that the terrorists are dead... (writing it with a wink )

Originally posted by: Clochette

Would you read it - to educate yourself?

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2017/08/09/muslims-and-islam-key-findings-in-the-u-s-and-around-the-world/

Although 10 years old... an excerpt

What I have heard from the sources is those were created by the U.S. The rest everyone knows better!

Even the chart depicted clearly that no one favors excessive negativity being spread.

Originally posted by: Clochette

At the moment, I'm still reading at page 36 (advancing slowly), but your posts very well show the hypocrisy... I also would wish a happy Eid but I would make clear it's only to the peaceful ones, to those who overcome their fear to show and demand that Islam is not misused for spreading hate and violence and oppressing/killing people.

Why even get "frozen" by this shout??? Why not talking to this man...and maybe prepare yourself with some positive Peaceful & Tolerance-Focused Quran Quotes. (generally meant)

So truly where there is hardship there is also ease. [Quran 94:5].

This is something beautiful and positive at the same time ✨️

These toughest war times will end soon.

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

You were asking for the reason or root cause of extremism in some post earlier hence i tagged u to let you know the root cause. You may not believe in them but the extremists do and they are the ones that matter not you.

As for posting the verses, i don't think it's spreading hate. It's about spreading awareness. Better be aware than to fall prey to false propaganda of being peaceful and the fake claims of victimhood.

No one wants to prove anything to you cos your bias is clear as daylight. The only reason you are being tagged, i think, is because you have been disregarding other people's genuine concerns about Islamic extremism and instead calling them out. What you call rants are actually the dark reality that many people are still unaware of but do need to know for survival.

Digression from the topic does happens as one thing leads to another and everyone (sparing two or three) in this thread has done that including you - remember Your Hindutva post. That just appeared out of nowhere probably to counter the Islamic extremism posts that were being made...

Although I doubt that my responses to this accusatory post have any effect, I still like to make clear where you are wrong in your interpretations:

bold: right

bold: The line that followed the enumeration of the verses was what I (clearly) pointed out as "spreading hate" (against Muslims in general).

bold: which bias do I have? could you be more precise?.... No, I didn't disregard "other people's genuine concerns about Islamic extremism". .... We a l l here k n o w "the dark reality", so why make post after post indulging in the fact that Islamic extremism exists??? None of the members reading in the war thread(s) is "still unaware" (and I suppose, not even one of the IF members in general).

bold: If you go back to the post, you'll see that it was just to show how also a very ethical and spiritual religion like hinduism is used for political agendas (which is also done with Islam). You know very well, that I just wrote the correct definition the internet gives.... It had been o n e post...what about the m a n y posts digressing from the topic coming from the combined side Nathu + Cynical bringing over and over negative examples of how Muslims behave, even also including posts about Dhurandhar (which has own threads in the BWforum)?

To make it short (for the future of this thread): You're right, I'm wrong...happy now?

Originally posted by: Cynical1

https://x.com/erbmjha/status/2035006095614521344

News snippet that caught my eye as we head into the weekend

what do you think ? Is their time up to pay for their sins ?

When official documents have spelling errors and design issues, competent content designers should be hired for more accurate branding and content production.

Grammarly could have solved the spelling errors too for such a big brand post.

Burkino Faso - no such country exists.

Originally posted by: Clochette

Although I doubt that my responses to this accusatory post have any effect, I still like to make clear where you are wrong in your interpretations:

bold: right

bold: The line that followed the enumeration of the verses was what I (clearly) pointed out as "spreading hate" (against Muslims in general).

bold: which bias do I have? could you be more precise?.... No, I didn't disregard "other people's genuine concerns about Islamic extremism". .... We a l l here k n o w "the dark reality", so why make post after post indulging in the fact that Islamic extremism exists??? None of the members reading in the war thread(s) is "still unaware" (and I suppose, not even one of the IF members in general).

bold: If you go back to the post, you'll see that it was just to show how also a very ethical and spiritual religion like hinduism is used for political agendas (which is also done with Islam). You know very well, that I just wrote the correct definition the internet gives.... It had been o n e post...what about the m a n y posts digressing from the topic coming from the combined side Nathu + Cynical bringing over and over negative examples of how Muslims behave, even also including posts about Dhurandhar (which has own threads in the BWforum)?

To make it short (for the future of this thread): You're right, I'm wrong...happy now?

Digital misinformation can be avoided if a link or a screenshot can be verified directly by AI. Better not believe unless authenticity is verified. Even bots are cleverly mimicking humans.

Several posts, when shared with ChatGPT, were depicted as misleading and unreliable due to misspelled words, inconsistent design, typography issues, and most importantly, a lack of credible sources.

Current times are scary when AI covers for songs are there!