Originally posted by: janecastle
No one is better in this show. Acc. to Anupamaa's own logic, no matter how bad a person is, they are still allowed to be parents. She claimed Vanaraj Shah is a good father. And she manipulated Kinjal using Pari's name to give her cheating scum of a son a second chance. So if the FL of this show can keep serving her abusive manipulative ex in-laws for years, then how are Kotharis wrong in supporting their ex-damad? They are simply following mahaan Anupamaa's path. Neither Kotharis nor Gautam are good. But if Shahs can get all the support in the world after their actions, then so can every other character.
What irritates me the most is that Upmaa keeps delivering pointless lectures despite being a failure in both her personal and professional life. One can still give her the benefit of doubt for the collapse of her first marriage with Vanar. But what excuse exists for the failure of her second marriage?
It is true that Trashnuj was desperate to marry Upmaa. Even so, a second marriage is meant to be a second chance—a chance to learn, reset, and move forward. Upmaa completely wasted that opportunity. She should never have married Trashnuj while remaining emotionally tied to the trashy Tamashahs. That marriage was doomed from the start.
In her personal life, Upmaa failed as a mother in both marriages. As for her professional life, the less said, the better—it speaks for itself.
PS: In this so-called women-empowerment show, only Maya (Rahi’s biological mother) and Rakhi Dave (my favourite character) truly stand out as strong, independent women. The rest is just noise. Upmaa and her endless lectures have become unbearable.
6