Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi 2: EDT # 6 - Page 96

Originally posted by: The_Best

This seems to be completely Shahi’s pr https://www.instagram.com/p/DSmW_OTCF6t/

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

They’re so fugly

https://www.instagram.com/p/DSO0483AZaN/

I’m glad Kyunki is helping me move on from Kachra Rishta.

Originally posted by: Ajab.Pehchan

I’m glad Kyunki is helping me move on from Kachra Rishta.

That ghum gave pain to fans of all gens 😡😪 In the end none of the Jodi fans were happy or got a happy ending 😭😂

Originally posted by: Me_Harini

I don’t agree that the responsibility for how Bhoomi and Manthan turned out can be placed entirely on Tanya.

Not all mothers are the same, not all fathers are the same, and not all children are the same. Every family dynamic is different, shaped by personalities, emotional maturity, and the environment created by both parents.

Comparing Mandira raising Karan alone with Tanya raising Bhoomi and Manthan as if the outcomes should be identical oversimplifies a very complex process.

Mandira’s parenting may have worked but that doesn’t automatically mean every mother, under every circumstance, can compensate for an absent or emotionally unavailable father in the same way.

It’s already established that Karan himself was a deeply disturbed man emotionally unavailable, largely absent, and consumed by his past with Nandini. That absence matters. A father’s emotional disengagement doesn’t become irrelevant simply because the mother is a homemaker. Presence is not just physical; it is emotional involvement, guidance, and shared responsibility.

Also Mihir didn’t even know Karan was his son until much later. So even though Karan knew Mihir was his father, Mihir was neither physically nor emotionally available to him during his formative years. That kind of absence leaves a lasting imprint. The same cycle then repeats itself - Karan, while physically present in the house, was emotionally unavailable to his own children.

From a child’s perspective, emotional absence can feel as damaging as physical absence. Children don’t analyze intent; they respond to behavior. When a parent is distant, distracted, or disengaged, children naturally assume they are being ignored or unloved. That sense of emotional neglect shapes their insecurities, choices, and behavior.

I agree , Tanya made serious mistakes - over-indulging Bhoomi and Manthan, defending Manthan blindly, enabling bad behavior, projecting her insecurities, and failing to correct disrespect toward elders. Those criticisms are valid. But acknowledging Tanya’s failures does not erase Karan’s responsibility.

Didn’t Karan see that the kids were being disrespectful? As a parent, wasn’t it his responsibility to step in and correct them? Parenting doesn’t begin only when things go out of control. Ignoring problematic behavior while expecting one parent to handle everything is itself a failure of responsibility.

Karan chose emotional distance, remained largely disengaged, and stepped in only when situations had already escalated. Parenting is not just about reacting in moments of crisis; it is about consistent presence, boundaries, guidance, and emotional availability.

Blaming only Tanya also reflects a broader imbalance: when children turn out well, both parents take credit; when they don’t, the mother is often singled out.

Tanya may have failed in many ways but Karan’s absence, emotional neglect, and inconsistent involvement were equally damaging. Bhoomi and Manthan were shaped by both parents the values they absorbed, the behavior they witnessed, and the emotional environment they grew up in.

Parenthood is a partnership. It cannot be reduced to who stayed home longer or who earned more. When children struggle, responsibility must be shared and in this case, the failure was collective, not individual.

Wish Kyunki’s episodes were longer. They are too short and finish fast

They might not be rich , they might not be living a luxurious life but I think they are doing more than fine looking at this picture.They are still happy , trying their best to give happy and healthy childhood to their kids.

Originally posted by: FaguniUpadhyay

They might not be rich , they might not be living a luxurious life but I think they are doing more than fine looking at this picture.They are still happy , trying their best to give happy and healthy childhood to their kids.

Staying outside SN is boon for them. Inke paas Paisa nahin hai par shanti hai. If they had moved to SN then somebody would have surely plotted to separate them