Originally posted by: truptishree
She did believe that he slept with Malla despite loving her and accused him.
When she found out the truth then only she felt guilty and apologized to him but didn't tell him the truth. He was feeling guilty but she never told him.
Though he was intoxicated but still he imagined Mannat 😭.
So now tell me how's her accusing him and him accusing her is any different?
He also apologized to her for that mistake which he didn't even commit.
That time she believed Neetu and ARS's version and this time he is believing same manipulated version. Why different rule for him? When it comes to the same thing TRUST. Just because he is a guy he shouldn't accuse a girl. How's that fair yaar? If girl accuses then it's fine but guy can't say it. Isn't it injustice and not fair?
Thanks dear.
Ya I will definitely try to enjoy my break.
❤🤗
I am confused 😵💫 didn't he himself say it was a drunken mistake and he doesn't know how to happened in the store room scene, so why blame Mannat if she believes this. Are we expecting her to say no you didn't sleep with her even when Vikrant himself accepts?
With Vikrant accusing Mannat, nowhere Mannat is accepting she is having an affair with DK unless I missed a BTS somewhere 🙃.
Also, most importantly the scinearo here is completely different and it cannot be compared to Vikrant accepting he slept with malla. Here he married her secretly, so are we saying Vikrant believes Mannat would marry him, sleep with him and go around having affair?
I don't know if this is related to gender discrimination or if Vikrant is being judged differently just because he is a guy. He is being judged for promising something to a girl, marrying her, putting her fears about SR to rest and now backing out.
Edited by Rdigest - 2 days ago
1.5k