Pari’s decision to marry Raja, despite him being jobless, is highly questionable. Belonging to a rich Kothari family does not excuse Raja’s lack of employment or ambition. Wealth alone cannot sustain a healthy marriage; financial stability and personal responsibility matter. Pari, portrayed as a budding fashion designer, was never shown taking her career seriously. Marrying at such a young age, without focusing on her professional growth, demonstrates immaturity and poor judgment. Neither Pari nor Ishaani appears to have the qualities of an ideal life partner for Raja, and Raja’s affair with Ishaani further underscores his irresponsibility and lack of moral grounding. Both share accountability for the breakdown of their marriage.
Anupama’s role in defending Pari adds another layer of inconsistency. Despite her own failed marriages—with Vanraj and later with Anuj—she positions herself as a moral authority and fights for Pari’s decisions. This undermines the credibility of her guidance. By supporting Pari’s premature marriage, Anupama ignores the lessons from her own experiences, indirectly promoting a path that led to her own struggles. Instead of advising Pari to prioritize career and personal growth, she validates a choice that could repeat similar mistakes across generations.
In essence, this storyline reflects poor decision-making on multiple fronts: Pari’s premature marriage, Raja’s lack of responsibility, and Anupama’s questionable defense of these choices. It highlights how societal pressures and the glorification of wealth can overshadow personal growth, career focus, and moral accountability.
Shiv Shakti
Iss Pyaar Ko Kya Naam Doon
6