Truth, lies and delusions of Geetanjali - A tribute from Gen4 pankhas - Page 8

Originally posted by: Solitudelover

This was supposed to be a tribute to Geetu but anyways

Ar did take away Maira away and separated the mother and child for 7 years and there is no justification for it. But since we are discussing Geetu here, when Ar was going to tell Ab the truth finally.. Geetu came in and literally begged him not to reveal the truth.. So there's that..

And comparing Ruhi's suicide act, maybe Ar felt Geetu was too far gone when compared to Ruhi which it felt like she was by her repeated attempts... Ruhi only threatened suicide to call him there, was not trying out one suicidal act after the other..

I think during Ruhi's time, it was only Armaan who had to bear the brunt and he didn't have any past baggage due to which someone would be impacted but in case of Geetanjali, Armaan already kept Maira away from Abhira, realized his crime and wanted to correct it by giving Maira to Abhira, he saw how Maira was refusing to accept Abhira initially after truth came out, he saw how Geetanjali had that influence on Maira to successfully manipulate her and get things done, so all this attributed to his fear of her claims becoming true if she is alive and stayed "alone" - "Agar mein zinda rahungi aur akeli rahungi tho Maira aur Abhira ko alag karke rahungi" (not exact dialogue)

Originally posted by: A_Star39

See geetanjali is totally wrong for trying to kill maira and abhira.

I feel Armaan didnt had any option so he went ahead with geetanjali.It was clear in the epi that he was hurt by abhira moving on and he had some emotional chaos going on.

Armaan married geetanjali by seeing abhira moving on and he also was guilty that he kept geetanjali on her toes.

Geetanjali wasnt evil from start and my POV is that Armaan triggered Geetanjali's emotional chaos and insecure side.Geetanjali did stop armaan earlier and she was greedy for maira and armaan.Armaan somehow has a part in hurting geetanjali.

Armaan again failed in dealing with geetanjali like he did with abhira and ruhi.

Its my POV.Geetanjali's insecurity and jealousy was triggered by armaan with his as usual confused and casual behaviour.He could have clearly told geetanjali to make boundaries at first place and should have refused for engagement.

Armaan engaged with geetanjali seeing abhira move on as he saw her on TV and married her after assuming anshumana and abhira married.Geetanjali was a dumbass too and both created this chaos for themseleves.Geetanjali was obsessed with armaan.

Its not entirely geetanjali's fault and armaan and her both created this mess

@bold - Armaan didn't run to Geetanjali to marry her after assuming Abhira-Anshuman marriage. The scene when he decides to marry her, it's clearly shown him remembering/flashbacks of Abhira-Maira being happy together and wasn't shown him thinking about Abhira's marriage (not even one flashback was shown), it's conveniently assumed that he went ahead only because Abhira was married. Even the shows narrative post that, in many scenes Armaan has specifically mentioned the reason behind this marriage to Geetanjali herself and she didn't even oppose it.

@underlined - Armaan didn't go ahead with engagement thinking Abhira moved on, he did only because Maira asked him in almost death bed. There was a dialogue where he specifically mentions post he decides to get engaged to Geetanjali that he has to take divorce from Abhira so that she can move on.

https://x.com/gloriousgurl07/status/1974847045698789871

No means No irrespective of the gender

Originally posted by: Solitudelover

https://x.com/gloriousgurl07/status/1974847045698789871

No means No irrespective of the gender

Also consent requires both parties to be fully in their senses - one of them inebriated doesn't count as consent

Originally posted by: Mehersudha

how did geetu ji come into story bolo. Because of the greattt mahaaan male lead who ran away with a 11 day beti blaming the mother as worst mother and his rised mother as sauteli maa. Who told him to stay in geetu house? who told him to get attached for kid. He is not doodh peeta javan bacha 🤐 he didn't have money to pay rent properly stayed there taking advantage of their goodness and used them for nanny service to maira. Geetu paid price for holding ar and maira tail 😜

This is like asking how Armaan and Poddars came into show or for that matter any other character. There were other cameos also who were brought in like RK and Anshuman, they also met the lead characters due to some reason so same way Geetanjali also was brought in as Armaan's landlord's grand daughter. This thread is about Geetanjali and her karnaame but all we do is go back to the only point that we have is Armaan took Maira away for 7yrs so yes everyone here is aware that he did that crime and none is defending it, that doesn't mean Geetanjali can't be held responsible for her actions ? No one in the show(except child characters) nor in the audience here are doodh peeta baccha lol

@Bold - He didn't pay rent for 3months out of 4yrs and that's taking advantage ? Many ppl who are in good terms with their landlords also take help from them if they don't have money for sometime and no that's not called taking advantage, it's called "taking help" or "taking loan". He used them for nanny service when Geetanjali herself in clear words told Abhira that he never asked for help and she voluntarily was doing things and there was a scene post first engagement fiasco where he clearly refused to take Geetanjali's help (shown in the episode itself) so no he didn't use them instead when they offered help, he took it when needed only(as it was clearly shown that Armaan used to do all household chores and taking care of Maira alone during start of leap) and that's called "taking help" and not using someone as many ppl do take help from neighbours, friends at times.

Originally posted by: Mehersudha

arey geetanjali bhi gandhi hi usko kaun mahan bola hi😂 she wanted haq by hook or crook and pahunchi cliff. Ar ram nahi hi na geetu sita hi. Donom kangal hi isiliye mangal kaam kiye hi. Pavitra pavan kaam ek behosh mein ek hosh mein andhere kamre mein 🤣🤣

Sorry this is being insensitive by mocking/laughing at something like physical assault or invalidating physical boundaries of someone and calling it "Pavitra Pavan" when it no where was that. She took advantage of the situation when she knew it would never happen in his conscious state.

Agar Armaan ki jagah , Geetanjali ke saath yeh hota tho aap aise hi haste hue mazak udati ?

Was so stuck with my work that I posted in a wrong thread. Chalo pasting the same here

The way people go to such lengths to defend that toxic vamp is beyond comprehension. It’s exhausting to see endless empathy poured into such character, while the leads are relentlessly picked apart and bashed, even after they have acknowledged their flaws and started making amends. What’s worse is watching a character who’s committed something as serious as marital rape be excused without any scrutiny, just to fuel unjustified hate toward the male lead. The bias is glaring !!

Originally posted by: Mehersudha

arey geetanjali bhi gandhi hi usko kaun mahan bola hi😂 she wanted haq by hook or crook and pahunchi cliff. Ar ram nahi hi na geetu sita hi. Donom kangal hi isiliye mangal kaam kiye hi. Pavitra pavan kaam ek behosh mein ek hosh mein andhere kamre mein 🤣🤣

@bold: Making fun of sensitive issues doesn't make you look cool. The way you're expressing it, comes across as crude and disrespectful.

Originally posted by: Phir_Mohabbat

tab to sab kuch hi makers ka hai. This gens Arman abhira. Gen3 s Abhimanyu akthu etc. Point hi nhi kuch discussion ka

Idk why we have to take one side and tell other character off. It can be fault of two parties. Like makers are hell bent on making arman bechara, some parts of fandom are running for the same.

I don't understand the stupid argument of geetanjali being like a teacher or whatever. That lady was a caretaker and second mother to maida. She run after the kid to udaipur - which teacher does it? And it's not like she was announcing on Mike dekho dekho main marne wali hu. Truth is Arman was missing a partner since abhira wasn't available so he ran to the available option. And when he gave that right to geetu she exercised it on every step

People expect her to leave cause arman that criminal shouted he will always love abhira... Such a funny line when he was perfectly fine 7 years staying away from her.

Also I don't believe Arman got marital rapped but that's a separate topic.

Fandom coddling Arman the poor bbg is highly irritating and funny. Everyone is at fault but not him, and now male card is also coming out. And I don't understand female audience defending a male character. My god as if women don't have their own issues now they are taking up charity cases too. Neither the character nor actors need the so called support. They will toss you away the moment track and show is over.

@bold - This post was specifically made to discuss Geetanjali's character and her actions and most of them are defending her saying it's not her fault. I don't think anyone here is defending Armaan or saying he is fault less but few are definitely pinning all fault on him.

@italicized - Geetanjali wasn't care taker of Maira, she was a known acquaintance and landlord's grand daughter who along with her Daadu used to help Armaan occasionally - she herself told Abhira that Armaan never asked for help and it was also shown that he was doing all things to Maira himself. If her intention was to die, she could have done it in Mount Abu itself instead she did come to Udaipur, went to Maira and scared her saying "You will never meet me again, I am going far away" and ran away immediately when she heard Abhir talking to Armaan on phone so yes she knew what and why she was doing. When Armaan met her, she did attempt suicide in front of him saying - "agar Maira nahi hai tho aap khaakh mujhse shaadi karenge", "main akeli nahi rehna chahthi hu (when she had her Daadu still alive) aur zinda rahungi tho Maira aur Abhira ko pakka dur karungi".

Armaan was missing a partner so he went to next available option - The scene when he decided to marry her clearly showed what happened and why he took that decision that time (shown him remembering Abhira and Maira) but we still will say he did it so he needs a partner He lived alone with Maira for 7yrs and didn't miss a partner nor got married then when he didn't even know if Abhira was alone or got engaged to someone but now since he assumed Abhira got married to Anshuman, suddenly he realized, he needs a partner so ran to marry Geetanjali although this "option" was available for him from 4yrs and he refused to get engaged to her when Maira along with Daadu arranged for it initially.

@Underlined - Again most of them in this thread openly accepted Armaan had done many crimes and none is defending him for those. Just because makers are being called out for writing a woman in bad light in the show, suddenly male and female card came into picture ? We all know characters, actors and even makers will move on from one track to another then why are discussing the show on daily basis not only about characters which are alive but also those who died years back ?

Originally posted by: chabalas

@bold - Armaan didn't run to Geetanjali to marry her after assuming Abhira-Anshuman marriage. The scene when he decides to marry her, it's clearly shown him remembering/flashbacks of Abhira-Maira being happy together and wasn't shown him thinking about Abhira's marriage (not even one flashback was shown), it's conveniently assumed that he went ahead only because Abhira was married. Even the shows narrative post that, in many scenes Armaan has specifically mentioned the reason behind this marriage to Geetanjali herself and she didn't even oppose it.

@underlined - Armaan didn't go ahead with engagement thinking Abhira moved on, he did only because Maira asked him in almost death bed. There was a dialogue where he specifically mentions post he decides to get engaged to Geetanjali that he has to take divorce from Abhira so that she can move on.

Armaan wasn't held at gunpoint and he had the liberty to take his own decision. He is responsible for his decisions but the **** was wrong with him as he was not in his senses.

He got karmic justice in a very wrong way.

Geetanjali got her karma too and is now dead.

That's how even vidya,kaveri got theirs.

Makers shouldn't have justified **** as it's a sensitive issue.

I only feel bad for **** part but if anything else happens with him it's his own decisions action

Geetanjali did went far with trying killing maira and she got her karma too by dying.