After effects of Indian Force's actions on Pakistan# 7 - Page 110

Originally posted by: suhaaana

I was just stating her point. I already know all this. Muslims don't ignore anything they use whatever they can in a situation. India has mecci Islam, pakistan has madini. You are intelligent enough to understand what I am trying to say.

I don't know what Mecci and Madini are. But I do know that certain sects of Islam in India are influenced by the Sufi stream of thought, whereas the Islam in Pakistan and a lot of the Middle East is straight up Wahabism.

Originally posted by: FBIr3port

Once again the use of the word “majority”

Yet they move to other countries and ask for and demand sharia. They see genocide happening in their countries and they provide covert if not overt support. They promote burqa and everything else that’s part of one book. They allow Oct 7 to happen and do not help recover even one hostage living amongst them.

No. Your use of word “majority” is consistently wrong. A genocide that happens in Pakistan and Bangladesh and Syria etc does not happen without its citizens an integral part of it.

I'm legit tired of spoon-feeding things. By 'majority ignores' I mean, the majority does not set out to execute jihad by killing non-believers. In the same post I've mentioned how most (a synonym for 'majority') believe that Islam is the only way and all else are wrong. If you could not comprehend what I said, I meant that most religious Muslims have fundamentalist beliefs.

Now please excuse me. I cannot keep on explaining every line of what I say here. Nobody else here has a problem with understanding stuff. I can't keep breaking down things to make it 'simpler' to get.

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

The word innocent can be defined by them in many ways. For example - would a person who denies believing in their Allah and prophet be called innocent? Would a person who refuses to pay jizya be called innocent? Etc. Etc.

Actually in a previous thread of this very topic (or was it the topic of Pahalgam attack either of these), a girl was saying something very similar to me.

She said that 1400 years back Muslims attacking Dhul Khalsa (a pagan worship place) was justified and so was kiIIing those who defended it during the attacks since they named the place Kaba of Yemen and that there was no need of another Kaba since one already existed...

I am not getting into whether this thought is right or wrong, but it does indicate that the definition of "non innocent" could be construed very differently from what we might do.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Actually in a previous thread of this very topic (or was it the topic of Pahalgam attack either of these), a girl was saying something very similar to me.

She said that 1400 years back Muslims attacking Dhul Khalsa (a pagan worship place) was justified and so was kiIIing those who defended it during the attacks since they named the place Kaba of Yemen and that there was no need of another Kaba since one already existed...

I am not getting into whether this thought is right or wrong, but it does indicate that the definition of "non innocent" could be construed very differently from what we might do.

Like I said, most (or at least, a huge chunk) of religious Muslims believe that going against Islam is an unforgivable offence. No wonder the religion hasn't reformed even a bit.

These pakistans if they hate India so much---just boycott everything related to India as Indians do to pakistan----

Pakis boycott India, everything related o india--just get lost for ever from India and Indians

we really dont like to think and talk about you

https://x.com/mufaddal_vohra/status/1926597145269764265?s=46&t=raeISQ_GJHRQslUoibooOw

Originally posted by: Reeva_Mohan

Like I said, most (or at least, a huge chunk) of religious Muslims believe that going against Islam is an unforgivable offence. No wonder the religion hasn't reformed even a bit.

But the point is naming a place Kaba of Yemen wasn't even going against Islam (at least not back then) because till very recent past (of that time), Kaba(of Mecca) was in itself used by Pagans for worship.

Back then the information wouldn't flow so easily for Yemen people to know that Kaba has now become the biggest important place for Islam.

The message sent to them by Muslims was that they should demolish the worship place (and not that they should stop calling the place as Kaba e Yemen) within two days or else Islamic forces will attack and destroy it. Obviously they didn't destroy their worship place and Muslims attacked them destroying Dhul Khalsa. At least 100 people died in there while trying to protect their worship place. And none of those kiIIings was considered wrong.

What I meant to say is that even if you show respect to Islam, there could be some actions which might be considered wrong by them and in that case you don't remain innocent

Originally posted by: Manavi_kesari

https://x.com/mufaddal_vohra/status/1926597145269764265?s=46&t=raeISQ_GJHRQslUoibooOw

Ab unke pass kuchh hai nhi dikhaane ko to kya dikhaayenge

https://x.com/meghupdates/status/1926486090656948256?s=46&t=raeISQ_GJHRQslUoibooOw

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

But the point is naming a place Kaba of Yemen wasn't even going against Islam (at least not back then) because till very recent past (of that time), Kaba(of Mecca) was in itself used by Pagans for worship.

Back then the information wouldn't flow so easily for Yemen people to know that Kaba has now become the biggest important place for Islam.

The message sent to them by Muslims was that they should demolish the worship place (and not that they should stop calling the place as Kaba e Yemen) within two days or else Islamic forces will attack and destroy it. Obviously they didn't destroy their worship place and Muslims attacked them destroying Dhul Khalsa. At least 100 people died in there while trying to protect their worship place. And none of those kiIIings was considered wrong.

What I meant to say is that even if you show respect to Islam, there could be some actions which might be considered wrong by them and in that case you don't remain innocent

That incident is just the tip of the iceberg. According to them, everything mentioned in Quran is set in stone and the slightest deviation is considered un-Islamic, if not straight up blasphemy.

They converted entire Middle East and parts of Africa by wiping out their indigenous cultures, and that is idealized by millions of followers all over the world.