Originally posted by: Aadia
I recently read about a verdict passed by SC on Hindu marriage not being valid without the rituals
The bench actually explained wedding ... thought I would share..
A Hindu marriage is not an event for โsong and danceโ, โwining and diningโ or a commercial transaction, the Supreme Court has observed and said it cannot be recognised in the โabsence of a valid ceremonyโ under the Hindu Marriage Act.
the bench urged young men and women to โthink deeply about the institution of marriage even before they enter upon it and as to how sacred the said institution is, in Indian societyโ.
A marriage is not an event for โsong and danceโ and โwining and diningโ or an occasion to demand and exchange dowry and gifts by undue pressure leading to possible initiation of criminal proceedings thereafter. A marriage is not a commercial transaction. It is a solemn foundational event celebrated so as to establish a relationship between a man and a woman who acquire the status of a husband and wife for an evolving family in future which is a basic unit of Indian society,โ the bench said.
Terming the marriage as sacred as it provides a lifelong, dignity-affirming, equal, consensual and healthy union of two individuals, the bench said a Hindu marriage facilitates procreation, consolidates the unit of family and solidifies the spirit of fraternity within various communities.
Courtesy -TOI.
Wish itv doesnโt make a mockery of marriage..
1.4k