Mumtaz Parties In Pakistan - Page 3

Originally posted by: Blueeeee

Mumtaz was super modern as well. Nothing about her personal or professional life says religious lunatic. People turning into shitty tories in their twilight years will always be Voight-level creepy. Zeenat was and always will be the "IT" girl. This is probably an unresolved rivalry and pretty shitty from Mumtaz

90s BW actresses like Rani, Raveena, Vidya have reached their twilight years, it seems.

Originally posted by: Sea-stars

Zeenat is liberal, while Mumtaz is moderately conservative.

She is? Not Onscreen though... Very liberal, 'open'

Btw did Mumtaz condemn Zeenat for promoting Zina despite being muslim? I couldn't find it

She only said it's against our values

Saira Banu also says it's unacceptable and unimaginable

Originally posted by: Karmacalling

No one is laughing here on mumtaz promoting zina....some islamic sanskaars in a democratic country like india the way they are laughing at mukesh khanna and his views????

Mumtaz has been living in londonistan all her life, n now while sitting in pakistan propagating islamic culture n values in a majority hindu country like India, ofcorse after making enough molah by going against core islamic values then, roaming around in bikinis romacing various heroes onscreen as well as off screen. Now she can afford to sound like a religious fantatic since there is no career left to worry about the consequences. I am sure we will see more such current actors coming into their own and peddling such nonsense in a few years when they no longer have to worry about fooling their audience.

We are already seeing how shahrukh khan is now making movies like raees, pathan etc wearing his identity on his sleeves after playing the audiece for fools for the longest time being raj n rahul jn every other movie his entire career.

So your point being? Only one group of people have the right to wear their identities on their sleeves? Or that only one group of people have the divine right to be conservative lunatics?

Shah Rukh Khan was always Shah Rukh Khan. He never shied away from it. He never needed to fool someone to be loved in his own motherland lmao. Indians burnt Obama's effigy when Shah Rukh Khan was strip searched in Ametican airports because he is and always will be one of us. And Mumtaz and Mukesh both are one of us as well despite giving shitty takes. They both can be called out and both will still remain Indiàn lmao.

Originally posted by: Funtuss

And then he shat on them same indians calling them intolerant when his movies were no longer working.

That's the point!

Yes he is still indian by citizenship but knowing how his heart beats for pakistan/is is seen through the kind of movies he has been making.

He has been very subtle about it but now he that he is at the very end of his career, besharm hoke openly pak parasti dikha raha hai which we have seen in pathan as if whitewashing criminal muslim gangsters wasnt enough he took gis besharmi a notch higher with pathan when he shown an indian as a terrorists and ISI as friends.

One of us or one of them living among us????lol

Lmfaoooooooooooo. His father was a freedom fighter who left Pakistan for independent India. Your dog whistles mean absolutely nothing. Indian constitution grants every Indian citizen the right to dissent, and expression. It literally is in the Preamble of the Indian constitution. He is an INDIAN therefore has full rights to express his opinions about the country. If he wants to publicly flag what he thinks is the rise of intolerence in his motherland, that is his fundamental right as an Indian like it is Kangana's fundamental right to say that we all were born in India got independence in 2014. Or; anybody else's fundamental right to make pathetic sexist jokes about Manmohan-Sonia. Last time I checked, we are still a democratic, socialist, federal, secular republic as of today.

Sanju glorified a literal terrorist's aide like Sanjay Dutt but don't see you bringing up or invalidating Ranbir's Indianness or religion lmao.

Originally posted by: Blueeeee

Lmfaoooooooooooo. His father was a freedom fighter who left Pakistan for independent India. Your dog whistles mean absolutely nothing. Indian constitution grants every Indian citizen the right to dissent, and expression. It literally is in the Preamble of the Indian constitution. He is an INDIAN therefore has full rights to express his opinions about the country. If he wants to publicly flag what he thinks is the rise of intolerence in his motherland, that is his fundamental right as an Indian like it is Kangana's fundamental right to say that we all were born in India got independence in 2014. Or; anybody else's fundamental right to make pathetic sexist jokes about Manmohan-Sonia. Last time I checked, we are still a democratic, socialist, federal, secular republic as of today.

Sanju glorified a literal terrorist's aide like Sanjay Dutt but don't see you bringing up or invalidating Ranbir's Indianness or religion lmao.

Lol where is the proof he fought for the freedom? It all started with his fake claims in his own biography written by none other than anupama chopra.

He was no freedom fighter. But the fans lapped up lies told by a film critique

I have also talked about ranbir and his religion, and how walls inside his house was full of jesus photos and dozens of crosses and how kapoors are also fooling audience. Not my fault people dont get senti over it the way they get when it comes to shahrukh khan

Yeah yeah i know fundamental rights constitution gaurantees to everyone even to those who demanded and got their own country due to religeous differences and then came to india or stayed back to grab some more land. Unethical but bothing illegal

Originally posted by: Funtuss

Lol where is the proof he fought for the freedom? It all started with his fake claims in his own biography written by none other than anupama chopra.

He was no freedom fighter. But the fans lapped up lies told by a film critique

I have also talked about ranbir and his religion, and how walls inside his house was full of jesus photos and dozens of crosses and how kapoors are also fooling audience. Not my fault people dont get senti over it the way they get when it comes to shahrukh khan

Yeah yeah i know fundamental rights constitution gaurantees to everyone even to those who demanded and got their own country due to religeous differences and then came to india or stayed back to grab some more land. Unethical but bothing illegal

Can I ask you something? Who died and made you the certifier of other's Indianness? Did Bharat Mata do an Akashvani and declared you,Funtusss, the divine judge of other Indians' Indianness?

Ranbir can start a new religion around Baby Yoda and that is his right as an Indian citizen. Preamble mein likha hai. He owes you nothing like Shah Rukh owes you nothing. What has Jesus got to do with it? Aur kis kis ke khilaf dog whistles hain aapke paas?

And it was unethical for British Indians to move to Independent India?

I don't smoke or do drugs but I am curious about the stuff you are smoking lol.

Originally posted by: Chingaari

Her sharp crispy conical samosa type blouse in all the movies was biggest mystery for me ..uske aage Bermuda 🔺️ ki mystery bhi blunt ho jati thi

Man, Madonna followed Zeenat who followed Asha. Iconic /s.

Originally posted by: Blueeeee

Can I ask you something? Who died and made you the certifier of other's Indianness? Did Bharat Mata do an Akashvani and declared you,Funtusss, the divine judge of other Indians' Indianness?

Ranbir can start a new religion around Baby Yoda and that is his right as an Indian citizen. Preamble mein likha hai. He owes you nothing like Shah Rukh owes you nothing. What has Jesus got to do with it? Aur kis kis ke khilaf dog whistles hain aapke paas?

And it was unethical for British Indians to move to Independent India?

I don't smoke or do drugs but I am curious about the stuff you are smoking lol.

Lol what randomness is this? Where am i giving anyone any certificates?

It seems you have no rebuttle to my counterviews calling out lies and fake claims father being a freedom fighter hence resortimg to abba jabba now

I am countering you logically and factually. I agreed with you on constitutional rights n all that jazz. You said i didnt talk about ranbir's religion and when i did you took objection to that. Where am i stopping anyone to follow or start any religion.

All i am asking them as a fan is to be honest and not fool me. And btw, not only celebrities, constitution gives everyone equal rights and i am exercising my rights by expressing my views about how these fakers are fooling their audience and ditching them later on when the career is over.

I dont know why you are so much worried about their rights and not aam janta's like me?? I am closer to you than anyone them will ever be. Atleast i know you. They dont. Its not nice to fight with me for peiple who dont even know your existence. Unless u r paid by them