Teri Meri Doriyaann Episode Discussion Thread - 61 [DT Nt-p-89] - Page 36

Originally posted by: arnavkushi14

agree,

I really want makers to keep the way they showed, it's already done, she called Angad from the medical camp he didn't listen, she thought he rejected her. Then both can fight on this, both are equally wrong.

They can't twist now??

My fear is if the show YRKKH way it is way more, They have revealed half use Angad for TRPS. Because the audience rejected Daljth and this leap. Let's see anyway can't do much,

Another thing is if Sahiba did all this thinking Angad knowingly rejected the kid, then when she comes to know that he didn't know about the kid, she should tell him about the kid na?? Instead of spinning more n more lies ... otherwise, Sahiba will look very wrong for trying to keep the kid away from a grieving father...

the makers are messed up big time... They have destroyed the essence of both characters.. there is no way out from this mess except for as someone said have a blast , kill off all characters n start fresh...

Originally posted by: Pinecone

You are giving logical explanation to the people who carelessly throw terms like paternity fraud but these people are the very same ones who are comparing a toxic abusive man to the victim of his abuse and claiming both are "equally wrong " 🙄so I doubt that such legalities matter then. If we are supposed to accept that Sahibas flaws are comparable to Angads crimes, cruelty and inhumane behavior then there's no place for logic anymore.

You not only throw out the mother, but also the child that is in her womb, they are not separate. She had sole custody if the father's section on the birth certificate was blank. In India, a single mother who gives birth will have sole custody. The right to visitation may be contested in court by the sperm donor. She is under no moral or legal duty to keep notifying the man who dumped her that, even after seven years, his fetus is still alive. He would have known if he had been responsible enough to even check what happened to her. Having an illicit liaison once does not provide you custody immediately. After that, you have several responsibilities, not one of which he fulfilled.

Folks are not aware of the rights that mothers have in this nation. Even the worst moms win custody battles until the child is five. There would be no case at all for Angad. There is a lot of conjecture on Akir's age so I cannot comment if he is older than 5. If Sahiba brings a case alleging that Angad failed to support her during her pregnancy, he could argue that he was ignorant. But Angad cannot bring a case saying he was misled by Sahiba. It's not the responsibility of anyone to keep informing to let them know they have a biological child; he cannot argue he was deceived and that he is a victim. Without a doubt, it is not the responsibility of the one he banished from her own house.

The only thing, in my opinion, that is wrong here is Sahiba's lack of resolve. It was time for her to firmly cut him out of her and her child's life immediately after he cut the call.

Originally posted by: DramaQueen101

If Angad is nothing like the original ML, who looked for wifey n repented, Sahiba is also nothing like the original FL..She didn't contact her parents ( when she could have), didn't even inform them if she is dead or alive evn after 6 years, left with a random guy she met on the bus, fooled ppl that she is the wife, still fooling everyone after 6 years...didn't try to inform about the baby to the father.. gave another man parental rights without even attempting once to inform the father...Nd looks like she deliberately hid about the kid from the father out of spite...So both have messed up big time IMO...

And why is she so upset that Angad came to Panesar? . Hell, she was so don't care that she had a picnic and a golgappa party when in Ludhiana... tab past ki yaad nahi aayi? Tab laga nahi Angad ke dekhne ke chances hain...?

That time she ignored her child and fake husband happy happy moments, she recalls the mommnets she spent with angad and Simran 🙄🙄🙄 every time, before also Daljith is talking about big house and big room he wants to give it to Akir, she ignored and remembering the Moments when angad showed their baby room

Means when she saw Angad, he showed her the reality of her fake life that she is living in and wanted to ignore badly... Other than that 6 yrs is a very long time to play Victim and she is happily living around Fake family or a good family I don't Know..

Any way waste of our time, they just do what ever they want..

Originally posted by: arshia1994

The only thing, in my opinion, that is wrong here is Sahiba's lack of resolve. It was time for her to firmly cut him out of her and her child's life immediately after he cut the call.

She essentially left for good and has raised kid away from Brars and Angad and their toxicity.

He cut her call when she informed him no miscarriage happened and she has not looked back since.

She didn't put Angads name on birth certificate also from what I read.

Originally posted by: hellodona

He is the one who rejected her 600 times, asked her to get out and refused to listen but it is her job to keep informing him by hook or crook. Why did he not care if she was even alive 9 months later? The baby is not a parcel she should deliver after she births it and wait for receiver to accept it. If he wants the kid he should have shown basic humanity towards the woman carrying the kid. If the mother is disposable the child will be too. (Yes we know his blood and all but ultimately kid also is blood of the mother who he has always punished irrespective of if it is her mistake or not. Don't get why onus is on her to inform by hook or crook and not on the man to actually bother a bit if she is even alive given he kicked her out when she miscarried)

And similarly, Sahiba should have put one more effort to let Angad know about Akeer. Especially after she delivered the baby bcos he has a right to know. That is what someone in a relationship will do. Her accepting another man as a co parent to her child is wrong. That Acha admi could have been a father figure by being her friend too. Father figure isn’t necessarily a dad.

Already there is no point to this show. But If the makers don’t show the above in flashbacks very soon the whole show will fail miserably and they better end it.

Originally posted by: Pinecone

She essentially left for good and has raised kid away from Brars and Angad and their toxicity.

He cut her call when she informed him no miscarriage happened and she has not looked back since.

She didn't put Angads name on birth certificate also from what I read.

She considered adding it, but after hearing Diljeet's comments, she left it blank. From what we've seen so far, it looks like that she wants to shield her child from her painful past. However, since Sahiba's point of view is never shown, I am uncertain of her true feelings.

Angad could not have done those responsibilities that he never knew existed. He didn't know she was pregnant when he asked her to leave neither then nor later. In fact, one of his primary reasons for asking her to leave is that he was told she lost her pregnancy due to her sheer negligence and carelessness.

Angad didn't cut the call, he accidentally didn't hear what she said and told her that its too late for anything now. She assumed he rejected the kid and left.

She cannot be self proclaimed single mother if she has kept the father in dark deliberately regarding the kid. And if she didn't do it deliberately, she should inform him about the kid when she comes to know that he doesn't know instead of spinning more lies and misleading him further.

The man has every right to be in his kid's life and to coparent as he is neither abusive towards the kid nor irresponsible. There are many ppl who hate their spouse but love their kids and are responsible n loving parents to them. She has no rights to deny him the parental rights based on her whims or notions. Court may give custody to mother for small kids but will provide fatherly rights to the father too which includes visitation rights, co parenting rights and rights to be recognized as the kid's official parent.. ( so much for her lies about Akeer ke papa.. raah chalthe admi ko pakad kar papa bana diya) ...living with another man is upto her but snatching his fatherly rights is just not done ( for God's sake he is not a sperm donor who has agreed to raise no claim on the offspring when donating the sperm..He is the father of the child who has equal rights to be in child's life just like the mother)

. Even known sperm donors of lesbian couples have parental rights on the kid which are discussed and decided upon... no one can unilaterally cut off even a known sperm donor from the child's life... yeh toh phir bhi straightforward case of enstranged father n mother hai...

Everyone keeps lecturing about how Angad didn't treat her well , how much cruelty he meted out on her etc...yes, he is a PATHETIC husband ...So she should NEVER go back to him... But he loves his blood dearly esp. his kid..So he has every right to be in his kid's life and co parent. She cannot snatch that from him.

Originally posted by: arshia1994

She considered adding it, but after hearing Diljeet's comments, she left it blank. From what we've seen so far, it looks like that she wants to shield her child from her painful past. However, since Sahiba's point of view is never shown, I am uncertain of her true feelings.

Doesn't sound like she's done anything unreasonable thus far in terms of the child's upbringing.

Why should Sahiba go back to inform Angad after he ousted her from his life and home. If he asked his wife to leave he cannot stake claim on the child either. And the way he behaved to her over all the episodes since the show started, clearly shows he has been abusive to her, so why would Sahiba return with her child to such a partner willingly?!

And its also been established that Sahibas parents were utterly unhelpful and unreliable people. So she's cut them off too. Whats so wrong about that?

Bhaiyo aur Beheno - HAPPY TRP DAY!!!! 😃

Let’s see what it comes in at today.