Originally posted by: K.Universe.
In the US, there are doomsday preppers and survivalists who are more concerned with short-term survival in the face of catastrophic events. Their preparations usually include stockpiling food, water, medical supplies, and weapons to protect themselves and their families during emergencies.
Off-the-grid living tends to focus on long-term sustainability and environmental consciousness. This kind of living could be very challenging in countries with large populations such as India. For one, land availability would be problematic. There are very few regions in India, available for purchase or lease, which are not densely populated. There are also regulations and zoning laws which require permits and approvals to build structures and renewable energy systems. Water scarcity is also a concern in many parts of India, so off-the-grid communities would need to implement practices such as rainwater harvesting, water conservation, and purification systems. Once you start doing all this, you are as good as living in towns, which is what most people who are not residing in cities are doing anyway.
Even if feasible, there are cultural considerations which may prevent off-the-grid living. How many families would approve of this kind of a living for their members? How would you convince others to join you for this kind of a "minimalist" hermit like living?
Appreciate the response. Condenses a lot in a nutshell.
👍So, it seems there ARE a few regions available for purchase, although they must be agricultural land.
I would differ slightly on your opinion that once a community starts implementing rainwater harvesting, water conservation etc, it becomes akin to living in towns. Township living implies involvement of government institutions, but a sustainable community in a proportionately large land area can implement organic farming, water harvesting, animal husbandry, renewal energy systems etc without (or with minimalistic) involvement of governance mechanisms, and/or modern technology solutions, for a natural, peaceful and fulfilling lifestyle.
Of course, if the community hankers for city amenities, then not only will it try to get the parcel of land near towns/cities, but would also approach municipality/ local government for provision of such facilities, in which case the entire project becomes an extension of a township
(with all the associated negativities of modern lifestyle), only that it has the framework of an enclave.
Very true, that it is next to impossible to convince others to give everything up for a minimalist living. It will only be when the true recognition of the myriad ways the living ecosystem in cities has been corrupted (food, water, society etal.) that will make some pause to think and go — hmmm... 🤔
Edited by Summon.All - 2 months ago
comment:
p_commentcount