Ram Mandir Inauguration invite for Rk Alia - Page 7

Originally posted by: Agni_Jytsona

My point was only about the riots and killing people today for something that happened in 15th century

I am glad both communities could co-exist.

I just think the blood shed that happened was futile.

What is the point of creating temple and Mosques if we can't respect fellow human lives?

There’s your answer. I wrote a response twice and deleted in past few days.

I think Sadhguru explains it perfectly.

https://x.com/rishibagree/status/1745055254042083681?s=46&t=Q96IWrDq2C9bhu2B8fjITg

Originally posted by: NathuPaapi

https://twitter.com/total_woke_/status/1745088496987939252?t=GtbYkjsiCun3oa7miSGA0A&s=19

Doghle log

Back to the original article, I think the priority for the invitations have been out of whack, & bizarre to say the least. For instance, one of the first people to get an invitation was Iqbal Ansari, who in court opposed the building of the 🛕, even though he might be for it today. At the same time, the family of the court "friend of the deity" - one Triloki Nath Pandey (he himself is deceased) was not given an invitation. A very bizarre choice of guests, given their activity either for or against the 🛕 in court. Similarly, a lot of people were given invitations only on second thoughts - like Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi, the Shankaracharyas (who've declined), Sunil Lahiri (while Arun Govil & Deepika Topiwala were in the original list, Sunil Lahiri wasn't) and so on

Also, as an aside, I agree w/ those who say that this प्राण प्रतिष्ठा should have been done on Rama Navami this year, & also after the 🛕 was complete. Just b'cos political parties wouldn't be able to participate in it if the Election Commission had the election phases coinciding w/ this event is no reason for this event to have been pulled in. Also, from what I've seen on X from people who've been there, Ayodhya's station is not yet ready for all that pilgrim traffic, despite its inauguration a few days ago. The inauguration should have happened when everything was complete, so that the pilgrim experience is seamless, be it the transportation, the accommodation & everything else

Originally posted by: Kyahikahoon

Doghle log

In 1951, it was a Congress event under a Congress government: there was no Jan Sangh, much less BJP, and the Hindu Mahasabha had been banned/decimated in the aftermath of Gandhi assassination. People in the government, be it Dr Rajendra Prasad, Dr KM Munshi and Sardar Patel did not share Nehru's disdain for Hinduism or its heritage, & so attended the inauguration of Somnath despite him begging them not to

As for today, I think it's intellectually honest if parties that were never pro Hindu or pro Rama stay away from the event, rather than just putting on a charade here. But like I said in my last post, this 🛕 inauguration should have been done on Rama Navami, & that too after ensuring that Ayodhya is ready for all the pilgrim traffic in terms of the airport, station, accommodations and everything that any place that'll get a heavy amount of that will need

Originally posted by: Vr15h

In 1951, it was a Congress event under a Congress government: there was no Jan Sangh, much less BJP, and the Hindu Mahasabha had been banned/decimated in the aftermath of Gandhi assassination. People in the government, be it Dr Rajendra Prasad, Dr KM Munshi and Sardar Patel did not share Nehru's disdain for Hinduism or its heritage, & so attended the inauguration of Somnath despite him begging them not to

As for today, I think it's intellectually honest if parties that were never pro Hindu or pro Rama stay away from the event, rather than just putting on a charade here. But like I said in my last post, this 🛕 inauguration should have been done on Rama Navami, & that too after ensuring that Ayodhya is ready for all the pilgrim traffic in terms of the airport, station, accommodations and everything that any place that'll get a heavy amount of that will need

God forbid..if BJP loses the election? What if Congress comes to power?

Would they go ahead with the Temple construction? And what about their agenda that Pran pratishtha cannot be done till temple is fully constructed?

These people don't even believe Ram existed..but will cite scriptures to negate everything regarding the Pran Pratishtha.

And about Congress opposing coz of being anti Hindu..why is RG even doing temple tours when he isn't a believer!

Originally posted by: Kyahikahoon

God forbid..if BJP loses the election? What if Congress comes to power?

Would they go ahead with the Temple construction? And what about their agenda that Pran pratishtha cannot be done till temple is fully constructed?

These people don't even believe Ram existed..but will cite scriptures to negate everything regarding the Pran Pratishtha.

And about Congress opposing coz of being anti Hindu..why is RG even doing temple tours when he isn't a believer!

BJP won't lose the election. Congress is a shadow of its former self even in 2009, let alone 1984: only states they are even the top alternative to the BJP are those states that don't have another opposition, like MP, Chattisgarh, Rajasthan, Karnataka. In other states, where there are other parties, like UP, WB, Bihar, et al, they're an asterisk. In fact, I doubt that Congress will retain its status of national party for long. As for the I.N.D.I.A. alliance, it's a joke: there are a number of states where the constituents can't stand each other

Also, this Ram Janmabhoomi 🛕 project should not be govt associated at all, be it I.N.D.I.A. or BJP. Mosques are not run by govt: there is the All India Waqf Board. Churches are not run by govt: there's the All India Church Council. Gurudwaras are not run by government: there's the SGPC in Punjab, & various other Prabhandak committees in other cities like Patna and Nanded. The time has now come for Hindu temples to be totally free of govt just like the other faiths' are, and let every temple be run by its local devotees who are members of that particular sect to which the deity of that temple belongs. Let the donations & offerings to those temples be used for the benefit of either the temple itself, or the religious community associated w/ that temple. Be it schools, banks, other institutes or whatever. I endorse Ekam Sanatan Bharat's movement to liberate all Hindu temples from govt control, & decentralize their control to their local following

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

Invitation?? Bhagwan Ram ke mandir ke liye invitation kyon chahiye??

Who owns Lord Ram ki unke naam per invitation baant raha hai??

I completely agree with this.

It's absolutely ridiculous on Modi's part to "appeal" to the people of India NOT to come to Ayodhya on Jan 22nd and, in the same breath, shamelessly extend an invitation to a select few. Clearly, the VIP culture in India is not just alive but thriving.

It is also infuriating to know that Ayodhya hotels are cancelling bookings ahead of the temple opening. I am not sure if the hotels are doing this on their own or at the behest of the local/central administration. So what if they are refunding the money?! They better refund the money of course but that still doesn't absolve them of these unscrupulous maneuvers.

Shame shame!

Most of these VIPs are public servants who are supposed to have a people first approach yet they get "first dibs"?!

To rub salt into the wound, it's mainly public donations which funded the Shri Ram Janmbhoomi Teerth Kshetra trust which is in charge of the construction and management of Ram Mandir. Devotees from all over India, including villages, contributed voluntarily and generously.

These "appeals to general public to stay away" and special invitations to celebrities and government officials are mind boggling!

Originally posted by: Vr15h

BJP won't lose the election. Congress is a shadow of its former self even in 2009, let alone 1984: only states they are even the top alternative to the BJP are those states that don't have another opposition, like MP, Chattisgarh, Rajasthan, Karnataka. In other states, where there are other parties, like UP, WB, Bihar, et al, they're an asterisk. In fact, I doubt that Congress will retain its status of national party for long. As for the I.N.D.I.A. alliance, it's a joke: there are a number of states where the constituents can't stand each other

Also, this Ram Janmabhoomi 🛕 project should not be govt associated at all, be it I.N.D.I.A. or BJP. Mosques are not run by govt: there is the All India Waqf Board. Churches are not run by govt: there's the All India Church Council. Gurudwaras are not run by government: there's the SGPC in Punjab, & various other Prabhandak committees in other cities like Patna and Nanded. The time has now come for Hindu temples to be totally free of govt just like the other faiths' are, and let every temple be run by its local devotees who are members of that particular sect to which the deity of that temple belongs. Let the donations & offerings to those temples be used for the benefit of either the temple itself, or the religious community associated w/ that temple. Be it schools, banks, other institutes or whatever. I endorse Ekam Sanatan Bharat's movement to liberate all Hindu temples from govt control, & decentralize their control to their local following

U r right about what Should be..but it isn't..hasn't been possible in so many years

Originally posted by: K.Universe.

Most of these VIPs are public servants who are supposed to have a people first approach yet they get "first dibs"?!

To rub salt into the wound, it's mainly public donations which funded the Shri Ram Janmbhoomi Teerth Kshetra trust which is in charge of the construction and management of Ram Mandir. Devotees from all over India, including villages, contributed voluntarily and generously.

These "appeals to general public to stay away" and special invitations to celebrities and government officials are mind boggling!

U know so many people r waiting to visit Ram Mandir. Can imagine the rush on 22nd Jan without a general appeal. God forbid something happens who will be responsible? How to control law and order for so many devotees when u don't have n estimate of how many people r coming? On other days it's fine but on the day of the function? And appeal is only for 22nd..not next day