Sex Vs Content of Animal and Tiger 3

The success of "Animal" at the box office suggests a preference for explicit content over family-friendly movies. Unlike "Tiger 3," which lacks such scenes, introducing a historic Salman and Katrina sex scene could potentially elevate box office earnings to over 500 crore. Including Emran Hashmi's long-awaited kissing scene might even push the collection beyond 1000 crore. It appears that audiences are interested to cinemas for such explicit content.

Originally posted by: Farhad

The success of "Animal" at the box office suggests a preference for explicit content over family-friendly movies. Unlike "Tiger 3," which lacks such scenes, introducing a historic Salman and Katrina sex scene could potentially elevate box office earnings to over 500 crore. Including Emran Hashmi's long-awaited kissing scene might even push the collection beyond 1000 crore. It appears that audiences are interested to cinemas for such explicit content.

Salman is a virgin. His movies can't portray what he doesn't know himself.

There is a difference between Sandeep Reddy Vanga and Maneesh Sharma, it is always not about the explicit content but how much batshit extreme one can go with the vision, SRV has a vision, be it misogynistic, he does not treat his male leads on the basis of their names, for example Ranbir was not Ranbir but Ranvijay, similarly Vijay was Arjun Reddy, so much that people thought he is a toxic man in real.. LOL

Salman the name alone is not enough, a movie has to have that mojo too as people ain't fools

It's not about Salman it is about what audience want and how to earn a box office collection

Originally posted by: RaniPreityAish

Salman is a virgin. His movies can't portray what he doesn't know himself.

This is apples and pomegranates

Originally posted by: MiVida_Messi

There is a difference between Sandeep Reddy Vanga and Maneesh Sharma, it is always not about the explicit content but how much batshit extreme one can go with the vision, SRV has a vision, be it misogynistic, he does not treat his male leads on the basis of their names, for example Ranbir was not Ranbir but Ranvijay, similarly Vijay was Arjun Reddy, so much that people thought he is a toxic man in real.. LOL

Salman the name alone is not enough, a movie has to have that mojo too as people ain't fools

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

This is apples and pomegranates

Just want to know Tiger 3 could have earned more or not by adding those scenes.