🏏 ICC World Cup 2023: Grand Finale : India vs Australia 🏏Thread #3 - Page 48

Originally posted by: Spideyweb

But we would have won if we had chased!! in the 2nd innings batting because much easier n spinners also werent as menacing

Actually the pitch didn't play much role as ball was seaming only due helped.

But I meant Rohit would have batted had they won the toss to result would have been same irrespective of toss result

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

True that was the real turning point

He should have stayed yesterday, but can't blame him since his role was only to give start which he had

Problem is he is the only one who can dominate all kinds of bowlers....rest of them are good in patches...his stay was very crucial....like Travis stayed right till the end...n if that happened then other batters would also have scored freely

Originally posted by: RockingSunny

Don't know what made India so demotivated in yesterday's game. If they would have been confident and gave their 100% then I wouldn't have been disappointed at all in their loss. But the thing is Indian team knows that they didn't give their beat maybe that's the reason all of them were crying. It was so disheartening to see their faces after playing so well throughout the world cup

But just because they didn't play good in finals can I say they reached finals due to luck?? No not at all. Throughout the world cup India has played so well ek bhi aisa team nahi tha jise India ne allout na kiya ho. Our batsman did so well and they even broke records of ex player. So are all these things mere luck?? No these things are Indian team's hardwork and efforts towards the game for the entire tournament. Hence we should be proud still proud of our brilliant team

We are proud of our team, every match they took 10 wickets of the opponents

Unfortunately the momentum got lost only during final

If Australia had batted first , they might have scored atleast 300 + or so. That's what I feel.

Originally posted by: Spideyweb

Problem is he is the only one who can dominate all kinds of bowlers....rest of them are good in patches...his stay was very crucial....like Travis stayed right till the end...n if that happened then other batters would also have scored freely

True he should have stayed at one end

Congratulations dear Soni, prizi and diamond for being top 3

And top ten ko bhi bohot sara badhai

Congratulations to me (for ranking 31) and like me everyone else who took part in the prediction game.

Hard Luck India,Played very good over all,we enjoyed totally.

Originally posted by: Spideyweb

Problem is he is the only one who can dominate all kinds of bowlers....rest of them are good in patches...his stay was very crucial....like Travis stayed right till the end...n if that happened then other batters would also have scored freely

Yes when Rohit was there, Virat hit 3 boundaries in one over .

Or atleast Shreyas should have scored atleast 30 or so.

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

Actually the pitch didn't play much role as ball was seaming only due helped.

But I meant Rohit would have batted had they won the toss to result would have been same irrespective of toss result

ball was seaming in the first 10 overs...after that it became very easy to bat!! Spinners coudnt be st their lethal best too.. plus sloppy fielding...rahul forgot how to keep 🙈 its the other thing bumrah still came up some good balls with hid shrewdness but the ball was coming on the bat nicely...

Originally posted by: Rosyme

Yes when Rohit was there, Virat hit 3 boundaries in one over .

Or atleast Shreyas should have scored atleast 30 or so.

Yeah....i so wish he had curbed his instinct as he jsd already made 10 in one over..... after he got out....we hardly got any moment to cheer 😕

Originally posted by: Rosyme

Yes when Rohit was there, Virat hit 3 boundaries in one over .

Or atleast Shreyas should have scored atleast 30 or so.

True after Rohit left they hit only 5 boundaries in 40 overs

Just his stay would have made huge difference