Warning bells for Nav - Page 14

Originally posted by: Noorain13

I still wanna know when Akshara said she couldn’t move on because of Abhi lol. If you’re basing the marriage on assumptions and not actually what the characters are portraying and the writers are writing, we don’t have much to say :)

I have already mentioned it, it was after Abhi found out that Abhir is his son, Ak and Abhi had an accidental meeting while AK was returning from temple and Abhi was running, Abhi slipped and Ak held him, that's where there was a voice in her head that she couldn't move on because of Abhi, even though she had AN. I don't base anything of assumptions, you are telling us that a marriage where woman could feel her ex husband after 6 years through his muffler was a happy marriage then I don't have much to say.

Originally posted by: NomadicWonders

first para above - true, we weren’t shown the 6 years but we were shown that Abhinav did not know anything about Akshara or her past life. He just knew that she has a family in Udaipur, that’s it. He didn’t even know how filthy rich she was and that part wasn’t even related to her traumatic past! As regards to comfort level, they clearly showed when Abhir wasn’t around, they were just awkward with each other, the guy didn’t even touch her to put ointment on her hand when she burned her hand. What comfortable level are we talking about!

Second para above - what shows Akshara was completely healed and over her past in 6 years? The fact that she didn’t move on with her legally married husband in 6 years they lived together? If she was “completely healed” in those 6 years what was stopping her to make her “marriage of convenience” real, to fully embrace her relationship with her legal husband?

I am talking about the ITV comfort level. In ITV two people can be madly in love with each other yet won’t consummate their marriage for years so the physical touch discomfort was nothing lol. I am talking about the mutual understanding they had and the way they understood each other without saying anything and most importantly the way they raised Abhir. They have lived together for 7 years now so it’s normal for Abhinav to understand Akshara more than Abhimanyu who merely stayed with her for a year or less. And yes time has nothing to do with it but the type of lives you lives plays a huge role. Maybe she was lacking love but she had everything else and with Abhi she had love but nothing else. I don’t want to compare anyone here but for us to not acknowledge Abhinav and say he wasn’t there for her or didn’t help her overcome her past, then we’re defeating the whole purpose of why he was brought in.

Her moving on with Nav is not related to her healing. It was shown Nav never even tried and as soon as he started trying they moved on in their relationship. Just because he tried after Abhi was back into the picture doesn’t mean she moved on because of Abhi lol. Again if we assume that then that’s on us but that’s not what Akshara portrayed.

Originally posted by: SwatiSingh79

I have already mentioned it, it was after Abhi found out that Abhir is his son, Ak and Abhir had an accidental meeting while AK was returning from temple and Abhi was running, Abhi slipped and Ak held him, that's where there was a voice in her head that she couldn't move on because of Abhi, even though she had AN. I don't base anything of assumptions, you are telling us that a marriage where woman could feel her ex husband after 6 years through his muffler was a happy marriage then I don't have much to say.

I think we can interpret that scene differently because those were not her words but we can always agree to disagree :)

Originally posted by: Noorain13

I am talking about the ITV comfort level. In ITV two people can be madly in love with each other yet won’t consummate their marriage for years so the physical touch discomfort was nothing lol. I am talking about the mutual understanding they had and the way they understood each other without saying anything and most importantly the way they raised Abhir. They have lived together for 7 years now so it’s normal for Abhinav to understand Akshara more than Abhimanyu who merely stayed with her for a year or less. And yes time has nothing to do with it but the type of lives you lives plays a huge role. Maybe she was lacking love but she had everything else and with Abhi she had love but nothing else. I don’t want to compare anyone here but for us to not acknowledge Abhinav and say he wasn’t there for her or didn’t help her overcome her past, then we’re defeating the whole purpose of why he was brought in.

Her moving on with Nav is not related to her healing. It was shown Nav never even tried and as soon as he started trying they moved on in their relationship. Just because he tried after Abhi was back into the picture doesn’t mean she moved on because of Abhi lol. Again if we assume that then that’s on us but that’s not what Akshara portrayed.

lol, consummate ya phir romantic physical touch ki bhaat hi nahin hai!! Restraining yourself from tending someone’s wounds (who you lived with six years by the way) is next level of discomfort and awkwardness. People don’t have that awkwardness with roommates of one day too!! I agree they had good mutual understanding, but that was limited to mundane affairs of the house and Abhir. And I agree they are better suited to each other personality wise, but that does not mean that Akshara had fallen for Abhinav in those 6 years. Writers did not show that. If only they showed that, it would be a good convincing story of second troupe love (as AkshNav story is being portrayed).

Last para above - She did not know about Abhinav’s intentions until Udaipur track. So it an assumption that she moved on because she fell for Abhinav and it wasn’t related to Abhimanyu. But what they clearly show is following: after she blurts out the truth, next day when she sees Abhimanyu, her monologue in her head is something on lines “meine move on kar lena chaiye tha, mere saamne itna acha aadmi tha lekin mein apne aateet mein uljhi rahi”. Clearly shows that she is not moving on because she fell for Abhinav but because she wants to move away from Abhimanyu. There is a difference in choosing someone or moving on with someone because of them as an individual and choosing someone because you have had enough of your ex. That is why I said (not sure in replies to your post or somewhere else) that Akshara’s move on did not seem like a move on, but more like a rebound reaction.

Originally posted by: Noorain13

I am talking about the ITV comfort level. In ITV two people can be madly in love with each other yet won’t consummate their marriage for years so the physical touch discomfort was nothing lol. I am talking about the mutual understanding they had and the way they understood each other without saying anything and most importantly the way they raised Abhir. They have lived together for 7 years now so it’s normal for Abhinav to understand Akshara more than Abhimanyu who merely stayed with her for a year or less. And yes time has nothing to do with it but the type of lives you lives plays a huge role. Maybe she was lacking love but she had everything else and with Abhi she had love but nothing else. I don’t want to compare anyone here but for us to not acknowledge Abhinav and say he wasn’t there for her or didn’t help her overcome her past, then we’re defeating the whole purpose of why he was brought in.

Her moving on with Nav is not related to her healing. It was shown Nav never even tried and as soon as he started trying they moved on in their relationship. Just because he tried after Abhi was back into the picture doesn’t mean she moved on because of Abhi lol. Again if we assume that then that’s on us but that’s not what Akshara portrayed.

Ofcourse they showed that only,he said her,he will leave her,or she has to move on with him,slyly he said after he saw how she was treated in udaipur

Originally posted by: NomadicWonders

lol, consummate ya phir romantic physical touch ki bhaat hi nahin hai!! Restraining yourself from tending someone’s wounds (who you lived with six years by the way) is next level of discomfort and awkwardness. People don’t have that awkwardness with roommates of one day too!! I agree they had good mutual understanding, but that was limited to mundane affairs of the house and Abhir. And I agree they are better suited to each other personality wise, but that does not mean that Akshara had fallen for Abhinav in those 6 years. Writers did not show that. If only they showed that, it would be a good convincing story of second troupe love (as AkshNav story is being portrayed).

Last para above - She did not know about Abhinav’s intentions until Udaipur track. So it an assumption that she moved on because she fell for Abhinav and it wasn’t related to Abhimanyu. But what they clearly show is following: after she blurts out the truth, next day when she sees Abhimanyu, her monologue in her head is something on lines “meine move on kar lena chaiye tha, mere saamne itna acha aadmi tha lekin mein apne aateet mein uljhi rahi”. Clearly shows that she is not moving on because she fell for Abhinav but because she wants to move away from Abhimanyu. There is a difference in choosing someone or moving on with someone because of them as an individual and choosing someone because you have had enough of your ex. That is why I said (not sure in replies to your post or somewhere else) that Akshara’s move on did not seem like a move on, but more like a rebound reaction.

I don’t really like to talk about romance and stuff when it comes to itv because it makes me laugh but the reason why I said is because yes it’s normal for people to help you or band aid you but not in itv where again people madly in love cannot take of shirts in front of their spouses. The wife can make kids but if her husband is to take off his shirt she’ll feel awkward lmao this is why I was saying that was normal. Then out of nowhere they started hugging each other and holding hands for the smallest things and what not which obviously doesn’t happen overnight.

I think we’re just going in circles here so we can end it but I really appreciate you for keeping it respectful in our back and forths and not mocking anyone during our disagreements :)

Originally posted by: sweta2005

Ofcourse they showed that only,he said her,he will leave her,or she has to move on with him,slyly he said after he saw how she was treated in udaipur

He said if she’s not happy he’d leave. What else would he say? Forcefully stay in the marriage lol?

Originally posted by: Noorain13

I think we can interpret that scene differently because those were not her words but we can always agree to disagree :)

Even though she had An but she couldn't move on because of Abhi, weren't her words? There's no other interpretation than Ak telling that she had nothing with An in those 6 years and was stuck on Abhi, whether it was love or trauma I am leaving that to your interpretation. After saying she'll move on with An, when Abhi came to Ghouse on his bike Ak could sense him and she came out running looking for him, this is a woman who is in love with her husband? Then after Abhir's surgery, she had none to comfort her, her great husband was wallowing in his pity leaving his wife alone to deal with the situation, whom did his wife choose for comfort? She went in arms of her ex husband and between them her ex husband was the one who remembered that she is married to An. Ak's words and actions do not match, she says life with Abhi was an umarkaid and same woman remembers the beautiful moments she shared with him 2 days ago, this is after choosing and confessing her love for An. When An wasn't there for her when her son was going through surgery, you are telling us that he was emotionally available to listen to her trauma in those 6 years, I am sorry but things we have seen do not support your theories and it reflects in the fact that I can give you several examples of Ak breaking rules of monogamous marriage by emotionally cheating on her husband

****Love Abhimanyu*******

***Happy for Abhinavs end******🎊🥰🙏🎈