Originally posted by: atominis
Bollywood is indeed misogynistic, objectifies women, body shames women, shows women in a usually cheap manner.
I do not need a right winger to mansplain me what misogyny is and what is NOT.
Katrina looked great as she was. She did not need any surgery.
Also there is no need to shame anyone for their natural skin tone or height. Same men cannot tolerate when they are mocked for their height or looks. Most men would be crying double standards or misandry if we talked about how puny Khans were compared to tall stars like Amitabh and how goat like voices they had, compared to baritone of Amitabh.
Factors that are not under one's control and cannot be really worked on such as voice or skin tone or height should not be mocked.
Talent and skill also matter as actors otherwise any pretty model or pageant winner would have made it huge in industry.
Nothing likeable in Adi and K Jo calling normal looking girls like Anushka, Preity, also various things or Adi making Kat go through lip job for D3.
Kat was naturally stunning and did not need faltu surgeries.
It is not being honest but setting unrealistic standards and inducing insecurity in even normal looking people. Ranveer is not some Hrithik type handsome but he is not ugly either. And if AC can work with far worse looking SRK in so many films then what was need to body shame RS?
first, I provided the dictionary meaning of the word, misogynist, which you seemed to have overlooked. When we use those words, how about we stick to actual meanings, instead of what the woke army manufactures?
second, if we go with your definition, it would not be hard to see that the whole world is misogynistic. That's not very helpful, is it?
third, criticism is part and parcel of life. We've all had our share of it. So people should grow up and learn to deal with it.
22