Running away never helps - Page 32

Originally posted by: Moor278

I am not denying it.

I am saying that SaiRat as a pair and that's just visually.... for the purpose of how audience perceives it... doesn't need intimacy or close angle shots.... their intimacy in the attachment aspect has always been this simmering angst.

Lol..Virakhi main chemistry honi bhi nahi chahiye aur hai bhi nahi.. Kitna bhi koi pass baithke try karle 🤣...

But them not having no chemistry can't be justified nah the closeness they've in the scenes on-screen due to NB ka comfort in working with his wife on-screen.

Originally posted by: mysticriver

But them not having no chemistry can't be justified nah the closeness they've in the scenes on-screen due to NB ka comfort in working with his wife on-screen.

Does it work???? Does it still show chemistry however hard they try? And NB Ayesha manage to do it with social distancing .

Originally posted by: Moor278

Come on dude!!!!!!

Unadulterated hate for Satya???????

Ye Kab Kiya Maine?????? Didn't expect this from you.

I have been crying hoarse I have no problem for Satya!!!!!

Why does anyone who is against Sai marrying Satya is considered a Satya hater?????

Why do you guys conveniently ignore the other part of the sentence????? Or the other reasonings????

I am not against Sai marrying Satya.... I am against Sai marrying Satya just for the sake of it!!!!! To pacify P's fears!!!!! To get V off her back!!!!

As far as I know.... no one is against Satya as a person.... they are against the stupid rush of the decision... which doesn't look out to be thought out properly!!!! And is taken in haste because V is pressurising her. Promo se laga tha Vinu ke liye hai... but ab to vo bhi logic nahi hai.

Kya karega V ???? Jags ke jaise kidnap karke shaadi karega kya?????

Forget Sai for a moment, which mother gives an ultimatum like this???? Satya is supposed to choose a life partner, not a shirt to wear!!!!!

What if it's not Sai but one of the girls he interviewed who looked pretty shallow?????

Tab kya hoga????

Chalo maan liya ki Sai Satya ne sab soch samajh ke shaadi ki.... won't they need time to cope up with each other???? Everything will be hunky dory from day one kya???? Itne shallow hai kya dono bhi ki ek dusre ke upar toot padenge romance nahi mila itne salon tak isliye????

I am amazed that any simple statement is convoluted as 'hate' for Satya whereas every alternate statement is filled with hate for V....

Open your eyes and read properly at least....

The point I am repeating is this again... Satya se shaadi is a harsh decision taken under influence of V's action.... agar show main is waqt Satya introduced nahi hota to kya Sai Jagtap se shaadi karti???? Ya kisi bhi random Insaan se????

The choice of Satya when she has no feelings for him or he doesn't have for her is as random as a stranger!!!!! It is like there is no other option for her aur vo khud bhi fasa hua hai to let's make merry of the opportunity.

That's the crux of the issue ... not the character!!!! Please understand this.

P.S. feminism is for all those who claim Sai doesn't need V to survive.... so why does she need Satya now???? Tum khud bhi yahi baat bol rahi ho @bold

I MEANT unadulterated hate for Satya on the forum by a section of members literally nitpicking when he's not done anything remotely that's bash worthy while justifying Virat's kartoots!

People don't want Sai for Virat not cus of feminism they don't want her with him as he's her abuser that's why. And wanting Sai to end up with Satya doesn't have to do anything with feminism either. People want to see second chance at love troupe between them.

We can't speak on what if & buts. Same way we can say Virat would've consummated his marriage with Pakhi in honeymoon track too.

Why people shouldn't hate Virat? What love worthy thing he's done?

His mother wants to see his son move on. I get her pov!

You guys are against Sai marrying Satya but then why Sai should go back to Virat whether he's reformed or not. If Satya is being judged because of his mother's background that what if he'll do this do that going extent to predict he'd molest Savi. This isn't unadulterated hate? What's the guarantee Virat won't do the same thing again? When he himself hasn't acknowledged Pakhi's misdeeds. It doesn't matter what Sai thinks atleast in past she stood against it.

Virat kiya karega ya nehi we've been seeing that from ages. He'll forever be a pendulum.

Originally posted by: Moor278

Does it work???? Does it still show chemistry however hard they try? And NB Ayesha manage to do it with social distancing .

It's not about chemistry. I've already told you. I don't see any chemistry in Neil Ayesha anymore but he has clear issues having physical contact with her on-screen. I'm talking about that. You're again justifying it. On paper Virat loves Sai yet he's physically touchy feely with Pakhi visually.

Originally posted by: Moor278

Exactly dude... feminism and morals Bolne ki baat nahi hai...

It's how you apply them in day to day life!!!!

Twitter aur forum pe Halla karne ke kuch nahi hoga when you can't respect the opinion of other 'females' and see where they come from, diss at them without knowing their background and perspective . Not everyone has had same experiences... so opinions differ.

Also personal opinion.... feminism by females se jyada a feminist man is more important.... because only then he truly understands the core issue of the movement ... EQUALITY!!!!!

"Also personal opinion.... feminism by females se jyada a feminist man is more important.... because only then he truly understands the core issue of the movement ... EQUALITY!!!!!"

- I'm sorry whaaat?

Sai was never a feminist. Who called her. She was a strong headed woman that's it. She's been a doormat since the time of Holika dehan track post Shruti track.

Originally posted by: Moor278

My FIL is an octogenarian and single parent since few decades....

He starts kitchen prep and cooks nice rotis if I get late from office in the evening.

This is the house and values I live in!!!!❤️

And I get gyaan on feminism just for putting across views... which BTW are not even defending any domestic abuser. 🤔

Originally posted by: mysticriver

"Also personal opinion.... feminism by females se jyada a feminist man is more important.... because only then he truly understands the core issue of the movement ... EQUALITY!!!!!"

- I'm sorry whaaat?

I see why you picked up this particular statement...

let me clarify...

A feminist man in comparison to other "men" is important.... because he understands the core concept of feminism... to be treating men and woman as equal...

Not important in comparison to a woman though it did come across like that... entirely my mistake

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

In itv feminism, morals, ethics, domestic abuse, compatibility, trust, love, self respect ka sab achaar banta hai. I don’t know where gyaan wala thing originated from but it proves what makers said - that audience don’t separate reel from real.

And haa isi morals ka fayda makes take. And why shouldn’t they. The audience is handing out to them on a platter.

Couldn't agree more 💯🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌🙌

Originally posted by: Rosyme

Why noone s explaining Vinu that Sai and V were married and they had 2 kids. And Savi s Vinu s sister.

Pakhi comes in between with people try to tell the truth to Vinu.