Originally posted by: Tapdance
Here I'll quote myself with something you responded to.
I'm really not interested in a fight...so for the third and last time you can try and understand what's being tried to said or you can choose not to...I really don't understand why this has to be turned into an offensive argument?
I'm really not interested in any shippers and their defense...I responded to my friends tag...you quoted me, I did not attack you.
But I'm interested in my own mental health and for the mental health of people I interact with..just because we don't make threads everyday to call it out does not mean it does not exist.
As for the story arc questions...if you ever happen to read my POVs I don't say any of the things you've quoted in your last post.
For me the character of Akshara can choose whatever she wants...if she wants physical intimacy for comfort with someone she does not love....I don't approve of character assassination of her choices. She can do whatever she wants and I do not have a problem with Nav being a driver or middle class man or friend or orphan. I just have a problem with his character eating into the ss of the character this leap was based upon. That's all. Thats my only take on Nav as a character.
And if it's still not clear....you can't accuse some victims or survivors of abuse for being supporters of abuse without knowing anything about them. That's the point.
And FYI both Diya and me don't agree with each other on Akshara or Abhimanyu the characters..we constantly differ but coexist without attacking each other!
So I could never be her proxy...coz we actually don't think alike on the story but we think alike on this topic of mental health here ...that's all😆
I can call out a mango, a mango without doing a PhD on the entire orchard because it's self-evident. And even if I did a PhD on the orchard, a mango would not magically turn into an orange.
When I quoted you, you brought Diya in response. "What Diya and I are trying to say is..." implies a constituted voice. You cannot speak on someone else's behalf and then behave like your statements cannot be rebutted.
Since your posts were so against generalisation, I stated the two instances where I had interacted with an Abhira fan actively, and it is for anyone to judge whether I was cyberbullying her or merely opposing to ad hominen stances.
For the sake of not generalising, I again encourage you to point out the instances where anyone has trolled Abhira fans on personal basis (akin to the trolling Jay, Karishma, Pranali, et al go through or even otherwise) and I would surely call them out.
Again, where has anyone in this topic said that Abhira fans' mental health was negotiable? But then doing self-victimising whataboutery to derail a conversation is petulant.
Lastly, afaik, having ideological differences ≠ trolling.
Otherwise satire, sarcasm, debates, comedy would cease to exist. People who are not controlled by their emotions can surely understand the difference, don't you think?
Edited by Deltablues - 3 years ago
12