What a bunch of hypocrites.

blue-ice.1 thumbnail
Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 2 years ago
#1

all of them....no one said a word when Devi ji said that we will let CA decide who she wants to stay with.....but all of a sudden when CA left with Maya ...her consent doesn't mean anything...everyone realized that little kids are impressionable....anyone can misguide them and get them on their side...

Wah ...hypocrisy ho toh aisi ho warna na ho...👏😳

Bachha chors are not even bothered about stealing a child from her mother..

Edited by blue-ice.1 - 2 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

74

Views

3k

Users

14

Likes

225

Frequent Posters

myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 years ago
#2

Go to court no


Even court will say maya has no one and given her circumstance all court will rule in her favour only


Unless anuj uses his money power or maya is not mother of CA

Edited by myviewprem - 2 years ago
Anj_01 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 2 years ago
#3

Doesn't matter if you wanna call them bachha chor but they do make an equally worthy contender for kid's custody along side maaya, atleast from legal pov.

And I think the decision about CA's choice was made when maaya had not eyed anuj lustfully 😆 and her monologues and psycho self talks makes it very clear that she is neither mahaan mother nor great human being. If not more then she is equally problematic as kapadia or shahs.

And after knowing her true colors, the deal of CA's choice stands cancel. And ca herself repeatedly chose mummy papa over maaya then if she suddenly says she wants to be with maaya then kapadias will definitely have doubt. And not to forget, maaya did brainwashed little kid to come with her.

nutmeg7 thumbnail
Posted: 2 years ago
#4

Anupamaa deserves this. Anupamaa deserves this treatment. Probably this is why you should never entertain the likes of maaya at your home.

myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: Bechain_Bulbul

Doesn't matter if you wanna call them bachha chor but they do make an equally worthy contender for kid's custody along side maaya, atleast from legal pov.

And I think the decision about CA's choice was made when maaya had not eyed anuj lustfully 😆 and her monologues and psycho self talks makes it very clear that she is neither mahaan mother nor great human being. If not more then she is equally problematic as kapadia or shahs.

And after knowing her true colors, the deal of CA's choice stands cancel. And ca herself repeatedly chose mummy papa over maaya then if she suddenly says she wants to be with maaya then kapadias will definitely have doubt. And not to forget, maaya did brainwashed little kid to come with her.


as per law


First right is of birth parents not foster parent


maya never signed off her rights to anuj and anupama


so no way adoption is legal its fraud adoption


and since maan are not married for more than 2 years it means its illegal fostering or adoption


without marrying for more than 2 years no way anyone will give a child to foster forget adoption


no one sees birth parent character if not 70% parents should not have kids or keep their kids in world as their characters are not great


Only gandhi and mandela and martin luther king can have kids than as all have faults in character if we go by character of every birth parent


7 years kid decision is not asked or taken by courts as they are immature


next kid will say i will go with my kidnapper or some sexual offender because they love me will court allow


CA is not mature to decide who can be her parents


anyways that choice will not be asked in court as birth parent rights are first if they have not signed off their rights to orphanage or new parents


this i am talking from law point of view not emotionally or morallly


If we look at moral point of view vanraj ankush kavya toshu all have no right to become parents as they are all not morally right at all


even anuj is not morally right as he loved a married woman 26 years and never supported his adopted parents daughter was not greatful to his adopted family etc hes even handed is fathers business and property 100% to anupama his wife instead of giving 50% to malvika as per law and morality. So who has morality left in this show?


so no one can be parent in this show if we take morality into consideration


Also a parent will lie to kids for the kids benefit sometimes. Here anuj anupam ahave manipulated CA into thinking only they are her parents etc while maya is her real parent. Court shall not allow all that emotional blackmails of anuj anupaama too. Why blame only maya for emotional manipulation even anuj anupam ahave suddenly found love and time for choti because real mother has arrived.

Edited by myviewprem - 2 years ago
prerna4rishav thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 6
Posted: 2 years ago
#6

Well they are the bunch of hypocrites. No court of law in any country of this world can turn this into ApMAAn’s favour. Only in AnupaMAAverse there is a discussion, elsewhere it’s not even a discussion. Maaya can be whatever, she can be a Komolika or Pallavi or Mandira, she’s the mother who did not yet consent her kid up for adoption. Hence anyone else keeping her with them without Maaya’s persmission = kidnapping.


Incident whose outcome is in favor to AnupaMAA = Just and most fair decision e.g. Kinjal’s eloping with Toshu to marry him. Incident where MAA is on the losing side = Unfair, torture blah blah e.g. Pakhi’s eloping with Adhik. This one’s no different. CA will decide, CA will decide. Lo, kar liya decide. 🤔

myviewprem thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 2 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: prerna4rishav

Well they are the bunch of hypocrites. No court of law in any country of this world can turn this into ApMAAn’s favour. Only in AnupaMAAverse there is a discussion, elsewhere it’s not even a discussion. Maaya can be whatever, she can be a Komolika or Pallavi or Mandira, she’s the mother who did not yet consent her kid up for adoption. Hence anyone else keeping her with them without Maaya’s persmission = kidnapping.


Incident whose outcome is in favor to AnupaMAA = Just and most fair decision e.g. Kinjal’s eloping with Toshu to marry him. Incident where MAA is on the losing side = Unfair, torture blah blah e.g. Pakhi’s eloping with Adhik. This one’s no different. CA will decide, CA will decide. Lo, kar liya decide. 🤔


yeah adhik was lusting after pakhi as pakhi is sati savitri because shes related to anupama


there rakhi is bad mother as she wants good for kinjal to save her life from leechy shahs and toshu


here nandinis is bad as she supports kavya rights


all non shahs are bad and illegal only shahs and anupama are great and legal

Edited by myviewprem - 2 years ago
ShahH8er thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Most Comments (December 2024) Thumbnail + 4

Trollbaaz

Posted: 2 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: Bechain_Bulbul

Doesn't matter if you wanna call them bachha chor but they do make an equally worthy contender for kid's custody along side maaya, atleast from legal pov.

Which legal pov is this? Child's birth mother has not surrendered the rights in the first place. (Till she's proven to not be the mother)

Moreover, they have circumvented the process to start fostering when they were not even eligible as per the rules. Doctrine of clean hands is considered when the person approaching the court is making a claim on the basis of a wrongful act.

Such technicalities may obviously not be considered in a show but any sort of legal justification being plausible for them also works only in Apmaanverse and not irl

Anj_01 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 2 years ago
#9

If we go in technicalities of adoption then may be maan are not eligible for it. But maaya doesn't have any rights either if she gave her up before and only appeared after 6-7 years when the kid is already in foster care. She is no good mother either. Suppose if any other couple eligible for adoption have taken ca then what? Would you have still want maaya to take ca back.

She may have painful back story but what took her 7 years to come back is beyond my comprehension.

Jo log maid servant ka kaam karte hain wo log bhi bachha paalte hain aur unhe acchi facilities dete hain. Maaya ko independent hone ke liye ek decent si job kaafi thi, zaruri nahi tha ki usko crorepati banne ke baad hi aana hai. This is stupid perspective, matlab agat wo kabhi ameer nahi ban paati to kya kabhi apni bachhi ke liye wapas nahi aati? Aur itne saalo baad wapas aayi bhi to apna main motive bhul kar kisi dusre ke pati ko fasaane lagi. She is no saint. If maan is not ideal parents for ca then definitely maaya is also not right for her.

And at first I supported maaya because she was shown as genuine woman. However I still had objection on her reason of coming back after so many years. But still since maan is fostering ca only from some months and ca has biological parent alive who wants to take care of her then i felt maan could have let go ca but then change in maaya's character and also .i have a thought about it from a different pov, it changed my view about it.

I came to know about a instance from mother about some distant relatives. They didn't have children and were looking for adoption. One day they come to know that a lady has left her newborn in hospital. The govt. Agencies took baby in govt run adoption center and from there thia couple got the baby for fostering. They in middle of the adoption process when that lady came back and demanded her baby back. Apparently she was pregnant before marriage so she gave up baby to save her self From humiliation but later she got married to the father of baby and both of them came back to claim baby. This is the true case, I am not making up stories here, so here the real govt. authorities denied them any details about the location of baby. They clearly told them that have lost their legal rights to have baby back. Now here if real parents wanted they could have sued the adoption center and child care authorities, but they didn't, they accepted their decision.

In this show, the difference is maaya came back after so many years and she didn't even inform anyone she is alive or not. After 7 years if person is not found even court declares their civil death. So maaya came after so many years and demands ca back who is already in foster care. Maan do have a legal case in their favour.

I understand its everybody's hatred and frustration towards maan but a fact is a fact. Everyone hoped maaya to be sensible one but makers made her another lunatic woman. So if there is choice with whom ca should live then I'll prefer known lunatics than an unknown one.

Edited by Bechain_Bulbul - 2 years ago
Snowstorm22 thumbnail
Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail Visit Streak 30 Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 2 years ago
#10

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

all of them....no one said a word when Devi ji said that we will let CA decide who she wants to stay with.....but all of a sudden when CA left with Maya ...her consent doesn't mean anything...everyone realized that little kids are impressionable....anyone can misguide them and get them on their side...

Wah ...hypocrisy ho toh aisi ho warna na ho...👏😳

Bachha chors are not even bothered about stealing a child from her mother..

I know right. I was thinking the same. No one had problem keeping bio child away from bio-mom.🤦🏻‍♀️😡

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".