What a bunch of hypocrites. - Page 2

Originally posted by: blue-ice.1

all of them....no one said a word when Devi ji said that we will let CA decide who she wants to stay with.....but all of a sudden when CA left with Maya ...her consent doesn't mean anything...everyone realized that little kids are impressionable....anyone can misguide them and get them on their side...

Wah ...hypocrisy ho toh aisi ho warna na ho...👏😳

Bachha chors are not even bothered about stealing a child from her mother..

When anything wrong happens to Anu di kids ( eg Toshu paralysis, Police case on Pakhi) , or anyone who is close to her heart like dimpy, Anu di ko bohat bohat bohat ghabrahat, baichani hone lagti hai.

But today, nothing has happened like this. She was dancing with her Romeo, guffawing loudly. ab isshe bada proof kya chahiye. ki anu di CA ki maa nahi hai. 😆

Its crystal clear that she has no attachment with CA and 4 mth rakne se , 4 din babaeli babeli and that to Anuj ke growl karne ke baad se.... anu di ab Maa ho gayi.😆

Originally posted by: ShahH8er

Which legal pov is this? Child's birth mother has not surrendered the rights in the first place. (Till she's proven to not be the mother)

Moreover, they have circumvented the process to start fostering when they were not even eligible as per the rules. Doctrine of clean hands is considered when the person approaching the court is making a claim on the basis of a wrongful act.

Such technicalities may obviously not be considered in a show but any sort of legal justification being plausible for them also works only in Apmaanverse and not irl

Biological mother loses claim once they place child in adoption centre. Its considered giving up their rights.

Maaya had placed the the child in orphanage and was absent for 6-7 years, its the timeline equivalent to consider someone as dead. So now she turns up suddenly and wants the child back. This is not done. She has no legal rights over her either. What was she doing for so many years? Ca ko raise karne ke liye ek decent si job bhi enough thi. Zaruri nahi hai ki uske liye ameer hi banna tha. Its foolish perspective. Child is not some kind of optional assignment ki jab mann hoga tab kar lenge.

And court can decide in favour of foster parents if it deems fit. For example when sushmita sen adopted her first daughter, she was technically not eligible for it and she had to fight long legal battle to win. During this time she was already fostering her daughter and she said in one of her interview that she would have been devastated if after fostering for so many months court would have taken away her daughter just because she doesn't fit into some eligibility criteria. Feelings matters, reputation matters. There are other grounds court considers when deciding on these cases other than what is written in law.

Originally posted by: Bechain_Bulbul

If we go in technicalities of adoption then may be maan are not eligible for it. But maaya doesn't have any rights either if she gave her up before and only appeared after 6-7 years when the kid is already in foster care. She is no good mother either. Suppose if any other couple eligible for adoption have taken ca then what? Would you have still want maaya to take ca back.

She may have painful back story but what took her 7 years to come back is beyond my comprehension.

Jo log maid servant ka kaam karte hain wo log bhi bachha paalte hain aur unhe acchi facilities dete hain. Maaya ko independent hone ke liye ek decent si job kaafi thi, zaruri nahi tha ki usko crorepati banne ke baad hi aana hai. This is stupid perspective, matlab agat wo kabhi ameer nahi ban paati to kya kabhi apni bachhi ke liye wapas nahi aati? Aur itne saalo baad wapas aayi bhi to apna main motive bhul kar kisi dusre ke pati ko fasaane lagi. She is no saint. If maan is not ideal parents for ca then definitely maaya is also not right for her.

And at first I supported maaya because she was shown as genuine woman. However I still had objection on her reason of coming back after so many years. But still since maan is fostering ca only from some months and ca has biological parent alive who wants to take care of her then i felt maan could have let go ca but then change in maaya's character and also .i have a thought about it from a different pov, it changed my view about it.

I came to know about a instance from mother about some distant relatives. They didn't have children and were looking for adoption. One day they come to know that a lady has left her newborn in hospital. The govt. Agencies took baby in govt run adoption center and from there thia couple got the baby for fostering. They in middle of the adoption process when that lady came back and demanded her baby back. Apparently she was pregnant before marriage so she gave up baby to save her self From humiliation but later she got married to the father of baby and both of them came back to claim baby. This is the true case, I am not making up stories here, so here the real govt. authorities denied them any details about the location of baby. They clearly told them that have lost their legal rights to have baby back. Now here if real parents wanted they could have sued the adoption center and child care authorities, but they didn't, they accepted their decision.

In this show, the difference is maaya came back after so many years and she didn't even inform anyone she is alive or not. After 7 years if person is not found even court declares their civil death. So maaya came after so many years and demands ca back who is already in foster care. Maan do have a legal case in their favour.

I understand its everybody's hatred and frustration towards maan but a fact is a fact. Everyone hoped maaya to be sensible one but makers made her another lunatic woman. So if there is choice with whom ca should live then I'll prefer known lunatics than an unknown one.

There is difference between prostitution and maids or prisoners no one will eye or try to kidnap maid kids or prisoners kids etc

Prostitute have tough life even outside world

no one respect them all try to take advantage and target them

Maid can keep kid anywhere they want

a former prostitute cannot

what if her ex lover comes and suddenly takes CA and sold her off to make money

Or maya former captors come and snatch CA and sell her off

Without knowing reality of life people are comparing prostitutes to maids etc

Please read what happened to neetu singh grand mom she was sold like maya only than what happened to her daughter etc

Why prostitutes do not keep daughters with them after becoming free please read reality of life than blindly comment

No mother if prostitute will keep her daughter with her just like maya for kids safety till they can arrange that safe place

It takes decades to find safe place for a girl child for a woman like maya in real life too as laws and society is cruel in asia

this is no usa where prostitute daugher will be treated like commoner girl she will be treated as a child or girl to be used by majority men in society

also if you visit Mumbai, Bangalore etc metro many laborers, poor slum leave kids in orphanage so that they have safe upbringing

what about prisoners are they no kid home and school run by police for them?

Just because anuj is rich anupama is devi we cannot say maya is bad as shes prostitute before. She has right on her kids and not signed away

Maya worked hard for 7 years now has enough money to get her CA protection from society and bad men so why cannot she take her child with her?

Many mother in such circumstance can never make enough money to become like maya in first place atleast one woman did - instead of allowing her to live with her daughter maan and kapadiyas and shahs are treating her like criminal

Please read article below to know why maya left CA in orphange

https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/articles/everyone-knows-what-happens-here-to-girls/

Maya being biological mother will get the custody no matter what because anuj anupama r foster parents not even adopted parents. What anuj anupama say doesn't matter because anu's custody is with orphanage.

But here the main thing is no one asked Maya for any documentary proof that she is real mother n real maya. Without informing orphanage she is taking away the kid which is illegal. Maya was living in London so why didn't she took her kid along with her,, she was safe there n not in orphanage. She couldn't have become rich overnight. It's so absurd ..

Now definitely Sampat will kidnap anu n maya will come running to anuj anupama to save Anu 😕

Originally posted by: myviewprem

There is difference between prostitution and maids or prisoners no one will eye or try to kidnap maid kids or prisoners kids etc

Prostitute have tough life even outside world

no one respect them all try to take advantage and target them

Maid can keep kid anywhere they want

a former prostitute cannot

what if her ex lover comes and suddenly takes CA and sold her off to make money

Or maya former captors come and snatch CA and sell her off

Without knowing reality of life people are comparing prostitutes to maids etc

Please read what happened to neetu singh grand mom she was sold like maya only than what happened to her daughter etc

Why prostitutes do not keep daughters with them after becoming free please read reality of life than blindly comment

No mother if prostitute will keep her daughter with her just like maya for kids safety till they can arrange that safe place

It takes decades to find safe place for a girl child for a woman like maya in real life too as laws and society is cruel in asia

this is no usa where prostitute daugher will be treated like commoner girl she will be treated as a child or girl to be used by majority men in society

also if you visit Mumbai, Bangalore etc metro many laborers, poor slum leave kids in orphanage so that they have safe upbringing

what about prisoners are they no kid home and school run by police for them?

Just because anuj is rich anupama is devi we cannot say maya is bad as shes prostitute before. She has right on her kids and not signed away

Maya worked hard for 7 years now has enough money to get her CA protection from society and bad men so why cannot she take her child with her?

Many mother in such circumstance can never make enough money to become like maya in first place atleast one woman did - instead of allowing her to live with her daughter maan and kapadiyas and shahs are treating her like criminal

Please read article below to know why maya left CA in orphange

https://ruralindiaonline.org/en/articles/everyone-knows-what-happens-here-to-girls/

Maya was living in London not India so her child would be safe there. And couple who helped her could also have helped her in taking her child with her.

Maya is still scared of Sampat how she will protect anu .

As per Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 , biological parent lose right once adoption order passed but since anu is not yet adopted so Maya can claim her child.

But also this act says that mentions

"Who can be adopted?

A child can be adopted if s/he is:

i. An orphan, abandoned or surrendered (OAS) child who has been declared legally free for adoption by

the Child Welfare Committee (CWC)

(As per the provisions of the JJ (C&PC) Act 2015 and the corresponding rules)

ii. A child of a relative (a relative means the child's paternal uncle or aunt, a maternal uncle or aunt or

paternal and maternal grandparents)

iii. A child or children of spouse from earlier marriage surrendered by the biological parent(s) for adoption

by the step-parent.

(Section 38 and 56 of the JJ (C&PC) Act, 2015 and Regulation 4 of Adoption Regulations)"

Anu was available for adoption that means she was orphan in records. Why didn't Maya informed orphanage of being alive because she said she used to visit orphanage n see anu. How can she afford coming back from London n not afford keeping her daughter with herself.

Actually creative liberties can be taken. Not just this show, there was so much furore over legalities in the other show but kuch nahi hua.

So real world ke laws does not really matter in “fiction”.

Woh chhodo. What if Maya decides to force her ex-occupation on Chhoti Anu 🤢

Originally posted by: Bechain_Bulbul

Doesn't matter if you wanna call them bachha chor but they do make an equally worthy contender for kid's custody along side maaya, atleast from legal pov.

And not to forget, maaya did brainwashed little kid to come with her.

Which world/country's law? As far as i know, no country in the world gives somw random foster worthy contender right as ones own mom

And second point is exactly why courts don't let little kids choose unless they are of certain age. The courts decide what's best for them

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Woh chhodo. What if Maya decides to force her ex-occupation on Chhoti Anu 🤢

Yes yes prostitutes are so evil all they want is to push their children in flesh trade, the same flesh trade which they were tortured in and have PSTD from

I cannot believe some of the posts i am reading here from some called educated people, its like i time traveled to the 18th century. Worst of all, these are from women themselves who, being women, should understand how much of a torture being forced to let someone else use your bodies would be

Originally posted by: Bechain_Bulbul

Biological mother loses claim once they place child in adoption centre. Its considered giving up their rights.

Maaya had placed the the child in orphanage and was absent for 6-7 years, its the timeline equivalent to consider someone as dead. So now she turns up suddenly and wants the child back. This is not done. She has no legal rights over her either.

And court can decide in favour of foster parents if it deems fit. For example when sushmita sen adopted her first daughter, she was technically not eligible for it and she had to fight long legal battle to win. During this time she was already fostering her daughter and she said in one of her interview that she would have been devastated if after fostering for so many months court would have taken away her daughter just because she doesn't fit into some eligibility criteria. Feelings matters, reputation matters. There are other grounds court considers when deciding on these cases other than what is written in law.

Please stop making up laws or cite the actual law. Indian laws about who has rights to child before legal adoption are very clear

How is sushmita fighting legal battle same as feelings mattering? Her lawyers had to prove her case with established laws.

And how does that example has anything to do with a bio parent coming to claim a foster child?

People are literally making up fantasies to defend their favorite fictional Character