GHKPM Daily episode discussion thread #86 - Page 108

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Meanwhile harness lagake, kneecaps chadhake, rassi latkake seetiyo ki gadgadahat ke beech jhoomta hua Viru man gets readyyyyyyyyyyy

kal V ko latak ne ke liye award milega kya..., kyo ki after every mission usse ek award miltha hai, aara kaam S karegi aur award V leke jayega.

Originally posted by: nutmeg7

Apne legs ko separate karke Viru apne khud ke sipahi ko roller coaster ride deke, luft utha raha tha... woohoo 🥳

Vaise yeh V aise latak latak ke gaya kaha tha because, at the end he was still with S outside the storeroom , and who supplied him gloves and knee pad ,sorry not watching the show just bit and pieces on twitter.

That is the problem. For me, I do see there to be a indirect narrative, where V does have a reason for doing what he is doing. However, the direct narrative is giving an altogether different picture, where he has moved on with P. In fact we have discussions, that despite believing that V never intended to move on with P, how will it be proved that if Sai had not returned V would not have eventually moved on with P. There has to be something to prove that.

But over a period of time, despite all this V's every action has made him go down the drain. Like hiding Vinu's truth from the child and his mother. Is P more important than a child who is living a life thinking himself to be an orphan. Keeping P above all. Redeeming himself and trying to get rid of his guilt for P's state by sacrificing his family. When they are suffering for his mistakes and now his decisions to redeem himself. All his doing.

So the whole Sai-V end game has lost the charm.

Worst part is if P comes to know that he's Sai s son, she wont allow Vinu to meet Sai or Savi.

Her insecurity will increase more than what she was before the accident and she will suffocate Vinu also .

Imagine torturing a child to pacify a woman like P

Only the KD story could save him and make him worthy for sai. The indirect narrative I mean. That he is doing it on purpose a greater purpose. Otherwise I don’t see any reason why they should be together.

Somehow i feel V has no plan. He's just going with the flow.

During Shrutis time also he didn't have any plan .

He came out of the setup when Sada kidnapped Sai else he would have continued like that.

Originally posted by: Rosyme

Somehow i feel V has no plan. He's just going with the flow.

During Shrutis time also he didn't have any plan .

He came out of the setup when Sada kidnapped Sai else he would have continued like that.

This time not the same. Pakhi is same as sruthi for him. That’s what he says in the original.
during sruthis case also the aim was to get her delivered safely and arrange some livelihood for her. With pakhi, he didn’t have a timeline because he didn’t know sai would come back. Probably he would have given her support till she moved out herslef. But sai coming back made him anxious. Though I think there is no urgency as I would have expected. However the reasons could be the accidents and health issues coming one after the other.
I feel he tried to explain his side of the story twice… police station talk and picnic. Both times sai rejected him and their relationship. After that things escalated quite fast.

He doesn’t know sai has seen the oath ceremony or the honeymoon so dude thinks he is safe :)

There is definitely an indirect narrative. Only that will explain the characters. Not the ones shown directly. In my opinion.

I hope V hears Sai talking to the guy tmrw saying she loved only V, but i doubt he will.

Originally posted by: Rosyme

I hope V hears Sai talking to the guy tmrw saying she loved only V, but i doubt he will.

He wont.