Originally posted by: return_to_hades
Mulling over this movie more. One aspect that Anvita subtly conveys in her films is how men also are negatively impacted by patriarchy. Jagan does absolutely nothing wrong. He's a pure character who is genuinely devoted to music. But the toxic mother-daughter relationship driven by the mother's own gender biases drags him into their trauma too. Satya in Bulbbul similarly loses love and friendship because of the toxic ways of his brothers and the family.
I agree, but also, there were also hints as to how he benefits from it as well as free of it. When he advises Qala to sing for herself, she is incredulous, because she seeks validation from her mother (who perhaps represents patriarchy the most in the movie as she also represents the gharana, the classical music tradition which in many ways is also quite patriarchal in nature). She cannot even envisage what that means. But he has a mystical and mysterious side to him too, we learn not too much about his background except that he sang in a gurudwara.
And I am also intrigued by the fact that he didn't bat an eyelid when Qala discusses her mother's intimacy with Sanyal (the Samir Kocchar character) and says that it is for his sake that she's doing it.
There is the same theme of representing different types of men as in Bulbull, here, the Majrooh character also seems to be the sensitive, almost feminine type like Dr.Sudip, the Parambrata character in Bulbull.
Edited by Amri_IF - 2 years ago
3