What is happening to the world ? - Page 2

She called for the crushing of Khalistanis. Not Sikhs. Big Difference. The only Sikhs who even want Khalistan are the ones living in Canada/US...so I understand why you would be offended.

Originally posted by: aaditi123

She called for the crushing of Khalistanis. Not Sikhs. Big Difference. The only Sikhs who even want Khalistan are the ones living in Canada/US...so I understand why you would be offended.

Because the ones that want it back in India get arrested or killed. And no she didn't call for the crushing of Khalistanis.. she attacked Sikhs as a whole.

She's clearly vying for the ticket and cleaning up her past slate. She might consider joining if she could gather enough insider support. If Sadhvi Pragya can so who's to say no to Kangy 😆

Originally posted by: DheeJattanDi

Because the ones that want it back in India get arrested or killed. And no she didn't call for the crushing of Khalistanis.. she attacked Sikhs as a whole.

Here we go again. When you say she attacked Sikhs as a whole, you mean she insulted Sikhism? The Gurus? Or the Guru Granth Sahib? Please do clarify.

Originally posted by: DheeJattanDi

Because the ones that want it back in India get arrested or killed. And no she didn't call for the crushing of Khalistanis.. she attacked Sikhs as a whole.

that's what the khalistanis preach.😉 Wonder what the many Sikhs who are industrialists, and became army chiefs defending India, President of India, PM of India, think.

btw, the khalistanis need to be whacked... for the Air India bombing and a whole lot of other terror they perpetrated.

also it seems odd but Sikhs in India have kept voting frequently for the same congress that the khalistanis hold responsible for '84.

Originally posted by: DheeJattanDi

She approved of the genocide in 1984. That targetted all Sikhs... not Khalistanis. But I am not going to discuss this with you... because the fact you are even trying to defend a psychopath such as Kangana is ridiculous enough.

Who is defending Kangana? Me questioning the validity of your statement doesn’t mean I’m “defending” anyone, just that I’m used to seeing generalised, hyperbolic statements. The question here is regarding a statement you said was made against “all Sikhs”.

Originally posted by: DheeJattanDi

Because the ones that want it back in India get arrested or killed. And no she didn't call for the crushing of Khalistanis.. she attacked Sikhs as a whole.

she was labeling everyone protesting Khalistanis. She thought this othering would because the majority were Sikhs. The party that pays her wanted the protest over. Clearly she was referring collectively.

Originally posted by: sev.puri

Who is defending Kangana? Me questioning the validity of your statement doesn’t mean I’m “defending” anyone, just that I’m used to seeing generalised, hyperbolic statements. The question here is regarding a statement you said was made against “all Sikhs”.

it was. The people protesting weren’t demanding a Khalistan. They just wanted the farm laws repealed. Majority happened to be Sikhs so she wanted to crush them.

Originally posted by: sev.puri

Here we go again. When you say she attacked Sikhs as a whole, you mean she insulted Sikhism? The Gurus? Or the Guru Granth Sahib? Please do clarify.

she insulted all the Sikhs in the protest. You have to look at the contest of the tweet. When did it happen ? What was her motive ?

Btw.. even in the 80s many innocent Sikhs were killed under this Khalistani label.

Originally posted by: Maroonporsche

Its all good

So right now her insta shows that shes at some Indian equivalent to a Klan rally ?

pretty much I am surprised she still has so many defenders. Everyone I know even BJP supporters agree the woman is nuts !