@msin
Beautifully put.❤️
Cannot agree more.
See it's stupid to expect this from him after he got over P and whatever infatuation it was and fell in love with Sai. Also everyone in the family knew of this.. aisa nahi hai ki it was hidden...
But just because Sai died and Sam died doesn't mean these two should be together. It makes no sense. 👍🏼
I had mentioned this few days back, audience hate towards V and P would have been less if it had been any other girl. Because then his moving on would have made sense. People do move on. It's only right when you know that the other person is dead.
Expecting V to rekindle the same feelings for P BECAUSE Sai is absent is juvenile. Atleast Ash should have opposed this idea. Which is why I keep saying that the makers reduced V to one organ. Just physical needs, no emotional connect.
And his frustration is he is not doing that too 🤣
I have a relative who lost his mother when he was of marriageable age, didn't want to get married at all. Took few years of convincing him to finally get him married. Had a beautiful wife and son and unfortunately lost his wife few years ago. Now no one even dares to speak of remarriage even though his kid is young. Some people move on, some don't.
But because this is a show, ML and PL are married in a weird twist and not even for a justifiable reason.
It all suggests that ML won't move on with her. And like Sadhika, it makes me wonder sometimes if indeed this marriage is even there. Legal to hai nai vaise bhi 👎🏼
It's not even EMA or live in relationship... it's more like hostel roommates 🤣
So well articulated @Msin.
They literally live in the world where they say "Ek ladka aur ek ladki kabhi dost nahi ho sakte" . And then they turn around and encourage P to maintain her friendship and defend her actions. Two faced-Rakshas!!
Not that old feelings can't be rekindled. But the possibility is as good or as bad as some one completely new. But functioning around this theory and forcing people to make it work is completely stupid.
Especially when they are related and shared a relationship which forbids any romantic linking on morality grounds. This changes a lot about the past and present and how two people can be perceived together.
We may say that people die and life must go on. But some bonds live on even in death, and like you said Moor, it would not have appeared so cringy if it was some other girl.
It is P who was once married to V's brother. It is surprising how a family so regressive could think of such alliance and support it. Samrat is completely out here. Is it that simple for the family and for V to ignore the fact that P is Sam's widow? For P we know things are different. She never considered Sam as her husband. And she had always envisioned V in that space. But for V ever since P got married to Sam she has been his SIL. Moving on is not wrong. But here it is the person that is making it seem all wrong.
And most importantly the logic behind pushing these together is so wrong. Ashwini thinking that P is the only one who can make V forget Sai. She is so obsessed in her love for her son and her hatred for Sai that she defies logic and her own understanding. She has been a witness to everything,
Yes they are making it more like physical relationship is all that matters. How shallow when we know how shortlived that aspect is and it is all about emotions later.
I think for Ashwini it is not V's preference. She knows Sai's hold on his heart. But like Sai, she knows P's potential to manipulate V. And she is instigating P to use her manipulation on V. It is her tactic because she knows V is not giving in. I doubt she is really thinking that V has any love for P or he can ever fall in love. She is only wanting him to move on from Sai. Saam daam dand bhed!!
How much awkward can they make relationships.
Cricket
3