Help me understand the box office of Indian films

https://twitter.com/SumitkadeI/status/1568885913643810816?s=20&t=eErtmzMPpeknmxB0IuXb-Q

According to this tweet, they need about 250cr net collection for Brahmastra to get hit verdict then how come Raees which was made on budget of 127cr and collected 128cr is a semi-hit, according to box office India?

This is the Alia Bhatt’s math Astra in effect, people have no understanding of box office anymore. Movies have to earn MORE than their budget to be hits. But only in Brahmastra’s case (because of the math Astra) it can earn less and still be a hit

Standard practice in Hollywood of course is to include international collections and other revenues. But usually in India, films are declared a success/failure based on the domestic collections. By that logic, Brahmastra won't really be successful, similar to how Raees wasn't successful.

The industry knows this, but they don't want to send a doom and gloom signal for a film that is doing so well. So they are using the Hollywood method of overall gross and ancillary revenues. Whether that is just general brotherhood or a PR campaign, that's a different question. Disney would benefit largely from making this seem successful because that boosts Hotstar viewership numbers. And that drives the stock prices right now.

Regardless the most important thing is perception, these verdicts don't really matter.If the film makes a lot of money, people will think of it as a blockbuster. If it crashes on Monday, people will think of it as a flop.

Originally posted by: semantic.error

Standard practice in Hollywood of course is to include international collections and other revenues. But usually in India, films are declared a success/failure based on the domestic collections. By that logic, Brahmastra won't really be successful, similar to how Raees wasn't successful.

The industry knows this, but they don't want to send a doom and gloom signal for a film that is doing so well. So they are using the Hollywood method of overall gross and ancillary revenues. Whether that is just general brotherhood or a PR campaign, that's a different question. Disney would benefit largely from making this seem successful because that boosts Hotstar viewership numbers. And that drives the stock prices right now.

Regardless the most important thing is perception, these verdicts don't really matter.If the film makes a lot of money, people will think of it as a blockbuster. If it crashes on Monday, people will think of it as a flop.

Interesting post, thanks. So most of this makes sense, but I’m still a bit confused. If we go with the most quoted budget around here of 410cr. Even if you include international collections, 2 days have grossed 160cr (ish), if you assume a good Sunday with similar numbers, it would still need to make another 170cr just to break even? And for that we would need to at least see how it performs during the week before declaring it a hit?

Originally posted by: sev.puri

Interesting post, thanks. So most of this makes sense, but I’m still a bit confused. If we go with the most quoted budget around here of 410cr. Even if you include international collections, 2 days have grossed 160cr (ish), if you assume a good Sunday with similar numbers, it would still need to make another 170cr just to break even? And for that we would need to at least see how it performs during the week before declaring it a hit?

Side note, it also does depend on the revenue mix. Disney is well known for strong-arming larger shares for themselves with the film. So they may be getting more than the standard 50%, especially if they dangled Avatar to the exhibitors. But even still it is very far from making money.

It's always been perception for any KJo, Alia, and Ranbir film. All their movies are perceptually hit, whether they break even or not.

A movie is a Hit when ROI is double and everyone involved makes profit.

Brahmastra will be a profitable venture and they will make part 2.

This might help

https://youtu.be/Ao0T1ShZ_vQ

Originally posted by: semantic.error

Standard practice in Hollywood of course is to include international collections and other revenues. But usually in India, films are declared a success/failure based on the domestic collections. By that logic, Brahmastra won't really be successful, similar to how Raees wasn't successful.

The industry knows this, but they don't want to send a doom and gloom signal for a film that is doing so well. So they are using the Hollywood method of overall gross and ancillary revenues. Whether that is just general brotherhood or a PR campaign, that's a different question. Disney would benefit largely from making this seem successful because that boosts Hotstar viewership numbers. And that drives the stock prices right now.

Regardless the most important thing is perception, these verdicts don't really matter.If the film makes a lot of money, people will think of it as a blockbuster. If it crashes on Monday, people will think of it as a flop.

Thank you. Most sensible post I've seen on this so far.

My interest in this movie was mainly about beating the boycott bots. 😆 That's done.

But BW desperately needs a bona fide hit. Am still counting on Vikram Vedha to do the trick.

That's the reason why I don't give a damn to all those numbers tossed around (or, in the long run to the verdicts of boxoffice India).

I'll watch Brahmastra tomorrow to get my own opinion.

I've stopped since long to trust any numbers ("success" or "failure"). It's very easy to manipulate them if the concerned persons/companies involved have the money to get the numbers they want or even are those who give the numbers.

I read the member's reviews and I'll see if my impression will correspond to their impressions. Twitter and Media reviews/numbers are of no importance for me at the moment.

I think that Karan as well as Disney are capable of anything to make this movie a success...for them, it's not a question of art but of money.

So, why bother about boxoffice numbers? 😉