Why Sai is not a doormat!!... Part 2 on page 4 - Page 10

As far as I remember, Sada told sai Shruthi is also an active member !!! She knows.

I am not talking about the operation part.

Thats why i hated the fact that even Sai was made to refer to Shruti as "masoom". She was anything but masoom. It is incredibly frustrating to see how they keep showing every criminal get away scot free.

Originally posted by: FoodieNaina

As far as I remember, Sada told sai Shruthi is also an active member !!! She knows.

I am not talking about the operation part.

Okay.. then I don't remember this.

All I am saying is, the law exists for criminals to surrender and get into mainstream. Lots of them have done this. Phoolan Devi even fought an election. So it is not that they have shown something wrong.

The makers want to keep the narrative that the gang surrendered. Sada was captured and Shruti is with an NGO so that she can leave her criminal activities. As per course of law, this is fine.

Calling her masoom is indeed an over exaggeration, I would agree to that.

Sai only reiterated what DIG said.

Exactly!!! That's the thing why majority ppl disappointed with sai. We many never expected that she will refer his traitor act like he is mahaan and she will equate her Aaba's promise with virat's promise to a naxalite to protect his naxalite wife. Vanku whitewashed both virat and shruthi by ruining a core characteristic of sai, RIGHTEOUS!!!

Theres no option. They have to whitewash V so they have to make Sai do it. Its sad that he didn't even get a brief suspension. DIG should've said your intentions may have been good but your actions were unacceptable. DIG even said in one epi that V committed a crime. But DIG forgave him without any due procedures/paperwork. Bus press conference mein ailaan kardiya ki report likhenge and V is innocent.

They could not really be accurate factually and have V acknowledged as a traitor for sheltering a criminal because if they did they'd have to eliminate V from story and focus on Sai- solo journey. To go back to family drama they had to do this..

I just feel like there could have been a balance. Sai is guilty because she feels she could have waited for him to reveal things, that he was called characterless because she knows he didn't sleep with her , she feels overwhelmed that he came to save her and ended up criticall ill n almost dead- so Sai is not gonna be able to confront him for how he is really responsible for this kaand.

I was expecting DIG, Sunny to do so. But they haven't either.

Hopefully V himself will realize he screwed up post reconciliation.

In my opinion, if they want to whitewash virat, they can go some other way rather than ruining sai!

They can hide from sai that Shruthi is a naxalite and they can make sai and dig believe that Shruthi is an innocent woman, not part of naxalite activities!!!

But no!!! They chose to ruin sai to whitewash that man😡

To be fair Sai doesn't know to what extent she was involved. Sada only told her that she knew of his nacal activities but thats it. She does not know that she was like full on leader and all. The way Shruti behaved in the jungle, Sai would have felt Sada forced her to do his bidding. Its only V and DIG who should know that Shruti wasnt just brainwashed or blackmailed or taken advantage of. Thr makers forgot that they said Shrutis father was Sadas ideological guru. That she was part of the movement for a long time. And she knew of the conspiracies to harm politicians etc at a planning level. DIG said Shruti was wanted but ultimately he very easily let her go to some NGO and let off V too easily for sheltering a criminal. So more reason for Sai to believe that if DIG is not concerned shes anti national.

So i dont think Sai has been destroyed totally. Its just wafer thin plot. And they need Sai to endorse V because shes the audience favorite. If Sai accepts V as not guilty then story moves forward. If she doesn't then they have to do something original. Which makers cant handle

Originally posted by: Nja91

To be fair Sai doesn't know to what extent she was involved. Sada only told her that she knew of his nacal activities but thats it. She does not know that she was like full on leader and all. The way Shruti behaved in the jungle, Sai would have felt Sada forced her to do his bidding. Its only V and DIG who should know that Shruti wasnt just brainwashed or blackmailed or taken advantage of. Thr makers forgot that they said Shrutis father was Sadas ideological guru. That she was part of the movement for a long time. And she knew of the conspiracies to harm politicians etc at a planning level. DIG said Shruti was wanted but ultimately he very easily let her go to some NGO and let off V too easily for sheltering a criminal. So more reason for Sai to believe that if DIG is not concerned shes anti national.

So i dont think Sai has been destroyed totally. Its just wafer thin plot. And they need Sai to endorse V because shes the audience favorite. If Sai accepts V as not guilty then story moves forward. If she doesn't then they have to do something original. Which makers cant handle

Has there been a single instance in the show where Sai had been on the wrong side on the show & Virat in right? Nope. Never. And it'll never happen in the show in future either.