The public jilting of Arohi - POLL CLOSED - Page 4

Originally posted by: FleetingWishes.

Some of the statements here are so dramatic and far-reaching. When did Abhimanyu promise Arohi ANY emotional fidelity for him to emotionally cheat on her? As far as I can remember he offered her a pseudo-contract where he clearly stated he'll marry her but NEVER love her or be a husband to her in any capacity except in name. All he offered was the deed itself--the marriage--and the Birla name. And the unsaid why was because she had saved his life. That was the motivation for the decision. The moment that why disappeared so did any commitment on his end.

Not saying he hasn't messed up enough but then which character hasn't? Whether Arohi deserves it or not is irrelevant given how she does play a part in what's happening. Literally, everyone is at fault here. From Harshvardan to Arohi to Abhimanyu, Akshara, and of course the Goenkas.

Each side, each person has an agenda they're trying to fulfill and that has resulted in the present chaos. Abhimanyu's actions are rash and irresponsible but not out of character. The dude's petrified Akshara will give into family pressure and walk away from him. He's selfish but then who isn't? Akshara, Abhimanyu, Arohi, Goenkas, Birlas literally everyone's contributed to this mess. Everyone's at fault. And so whatever consequences/disasters come their way, they all 'together' deserve their share of them one way or another.

@bold

He said he will never love her and will always love Akshara. But then he goes to Goenka house to ask rishta and tells clearly that, he is there for rishta and not love this time. He is there for saath nibhane ka vadha. That this marriage will have everything other than love.

There are so many marriages which doesn't begin with love. I mean majority marriages in India are like that. That doesn't mean they don't support and respect their fiancée and go ahead and be close to their ex. And even if they do that, it is not justifiable at all and is 🤢

Someone said in this forum earlier, if he wanted to play this touchy touchy eye contact wala game with Akshara, he should have told that to Aarohi and the Goenkas. Goenkas were willing to marry her off to this guy, because he keeps shouting about his tameez and how he respects women and how he will respect his rishta with Aarohi. 😔

Originally posted by: Ekahriz

@bold

He said he will never love her and will always love Akshara. But then he goes to Goenka house to ask rishta and tells clearly that, he is there for rishta and not love this time. He is there for saath nibhane ka vadha. That this marriage will have everything other than love.

There are so many marriages which doesn't begin with love. I mean majority marriages in India are like that. That doesn't mean they don't support and respect their fiancée and go ahead and be close to their ex. And even if they do that, it is not justifiable at all and is 🤢

Someone said in this forum earlier, if he wanted to play this touchy touchy eye contact wala game with Akshara, he should have told that to Aarohi and the Goenkas. Goenkas were willing to marry her off to this guy, because he keeps shouting about his tameez and how he respects women and how he will respect his rishta with Aarohi. 😔

She insulting akshu always saying average girl etc etc is fair?

She may not deserve public humiliation, but she selfishly was willing to marry the man she clearly know loves her sister and vice versa just to be the “best”. No girl deserves to be jilted on her wedding day, but then again no sister deserves a sister like her either.

Originally posted by: FleetingWishes.

No offense but what's relevant is what he said to Arohi. He clearly said he will NEVER love her and is emotionally devoted to Akshara. He made it pretty clear. How marriages are, what Arohi inferred, blah blah isn't HIS problem because he made a clear-cut commitment. All he promised was the Birla name, the Birla money at her disposal, and the legal boundaries. So where did emotional fidelity even come from? The dude's telling you he loves your sister. His emotional fidelity is to Akshara from day one and he's been pretty clear about that lmao. Your inferences are your problem, not his.

Array, you don't have to say no offense and all. It's all chill. 😊

I am not even talking about emotional fidelity. He literally manhandles his fiancée's sister. That's not what men who claim to respect women do. He made promises to Aarohi and her family which he constantly breaks. I don't care if he only thinks about Akshara and pines for her throughout the marriage. I understand that is what he promised and that would have been fine. But he goes beyond that. He breaks all the samman and respect he promised. He clearly says this marriage will have everything except for love but breaking all if it does make him a hypocrite and morally repulsive. 😔

Originally posted by: Ekahriz

Array, you don't have to say no offense and all. It's all chill. 😊

I am not even talking about emotional fidelity. He literally manhandles his fiancée's sister. That's not what men who claim to respect women do. He made promises to Aarohi and her family which he constantly breaks. I don't care if he only thinks about Akshara and pines for her throughout the marriage. I understand that is what he promised and that would have been fine. But he goes beyond that. He breaks all the samman and respect he promised. He clearly says this marriage will have everything except for love but breaking all if it does make him a hypocrite and morally repulsive. 😔

Didn't he tell the Goenkas the same? That this is a marriage without love? So what's left exactly? Giving Arohi his name, his money, his roof, taking care of her platonically. The Goenkas are the one who agreed to marry off their daughter to a man who stood in their house not long ago and screamed his love for their other daughter at the top of his lungs, literally detailed out their entire trip like he was giving tmz the story of its life. I mean How HOW do you do that? How can you take a statement as lame as this marriage will have everything but love -- because he loves your other girl -- and then marry off your daughter to him? He's neither a hypocrite nor morally repulsive for doing literally what he promised to do.

Originally posted by: FleetingWishes.

you literally highlighted the emotional fidelity part. Now, this has gone to another tangent. He's problematic and his relationship with Akshara's turbulent but what promise did he break with Arohi or to her family? He told her Akshara will be his first and last love and that Arohi didn't even have the right to call him Abhimanyu. This is literally promising his emotional fidelity and love ONLY to Akshara. In fact, this is telling Arohi that he'll never give her fidelity. So point out one action where he wasn't true to his words?

Didn't he tell the Goenkas the same? That this is a marriage without love? So what's left exactly? Giving Arohi his name, his money, his roof, taking care of her platonically. The Goenkas are the one who agreed to marry off their daughter to a man who stood in their house not long ago and screamed his love for their other daughter at the top of his lungs, literally detailed out their entire trip like he was giving tmz the story of its life. I mean How HOW do you do that? How can you take a statement as lame as this marriage will have everything but love -- because he loves your other girl -- and then marry off your daughter to him? He's neither a hypocrite nor morally repulsive for doing literally what he promised to do.

See Goenkas are effed up. No doubt. No one would want to marry off their daughters (both Akshara and Aarohi) to Birla house after what happened during the Tilak.

Aarohi is also extremely delusional. She is manipulative and a total ______

That doesn't give Abhimanyu a leeway in my opinion. He promised respect to Aarohi as his wife. The only thing he said won't be there is love. That doesn't mean he will go canoodling with someone else. All he meant by that is he will love Akshara in his head and in his heart and not that he will act on it. But what he is doing is acting on it. When he drags and manhandles Akshara which is disrespecting not just Aarohi but Akshara too. 🥲

I can see we are not gonna agree. We see these through very different perspectives. So, let's just agree to disagree.😊

At some point in time after all abhi said to arohi some humiliation was bound to happen publicly... Arohii knew he loved her sister but she continued to go after abhi.. Arohii was already humiliated when she said yes to a his proposal.....had she given akshara the credit for saving abhi she would have been in a better place..... Had she been absent for her wedding the would this convention happened.... Had it been abhi humiliation... Would we say it was wrong.... As women we need to be responsible for our actions we should never settle for second best arohi settled for second best.....

Originally posted by: Ekahriz

See Goenkas are effed up. No doubt. No one would want to marry off their daughters (both Akshara and Aarohi) to Birla house after what happened during the Tilak.

Aarohi is also extremely delusional. She is manipulative and a total ______

That doesn't give Abhimanyu a leeway in my opinion. He promised respect to Aarohi as his wife. The only thing he said won't be there is love. That doesn't mean he will go canoodling with someone else. All he meant by that is he will love Akshara in his head and in his heart and not that he will act on it. But what he is doing is acting on it. When he drags and manhandles Akshara which is disrespecting not just Aarohi but Akshara too. 🥲

I can see we are not gonna agree. We see these through very different perspectives. So, let's just agree to disagree.😊

Sure.

Originally posted by: FleetingWishes.

you literally highlighted the emotional fidelity part. Now, this has gone to another tangent. He's problematic and his relationship with Akshara's turbulent but what promise did he break with Arohi or to her family? He told her Akshara will be his first and last love and that Arohi didn't even have a right as basic as to call him Abhi. This is literally promising his emotional fidelity and love ONLY to Akshara. In fact, this is telling Arohi that he'll never give her fidelity. So point out one action where he wasn't true to his words?

Didn't he tell the Goenkas the same? That this is a marriage without love? So what's left exactly? Giving Arohi his name, his money, his roof, taking care of her platonically. The Goenkas are the one who agreed to marry off their daughter to a man who stood in their house not long ago and screamed his love for their other daughter at the top of his lungs, literally detailed out their entire trip like he was giving tmz the story of its life. I mean How HOW do you do that? How can you take a statement as lame as this marriage will have everything but love -- because he loves your other girl -- and then marry off your daughter to him? He's neither a hypocrite nor morally repulsive for doing literally what he promised to do.