This thread contains SPOILERS. So read at your own risk!
I decided to watch the original Telugu film Jersey starring Nani after seeing the Hindi remake trailer and hearing many good things about the original. After watching the film, my honest thoughts about it is that...
Yeah, it's a good film, even great. It has many emotional heart touching moments and goosebumps giving scenes. The story is predictable from the start because the climax is revealed at the beginning itself. Add to the fact that I ended up reading the whole plot on Wikipedia before watching the film (Don't know why I did that. Maybe I was drunk.), so even the end twist didn't surprise me.
But I think it was the right move to reveal the climax at the start because then the audience was ready for what was about to come. They didn't feel disappointed or heartbroken in the end. And it went well with the theme of the film. That it's the journey that matters, not the end result.
Jersey is not a success story. It's about a failure. The failure of a guy who never gave up trying. And that made me think. That this film is not really "healthy". Arjun is basically a drug addict and his drug is cricket. This sport was not just his passion or a gift, it's actually his obsession.
He gave up Cricket for 10 years but couldn't live a happy life with his family after it. We have heard countless stories of people giving up their passion for a normal life, instead of ruining it by struggling forever in the hope of making a career in it.
But Arjun is not like that. He gave up Cricket because of his heart disease but he could never be at peace with that decision. One can understand that, but it became an obsession when he wanted to come out of retirement at the age of 36. He knew he's putting his life in danger. He knew he could die. But he still went ahead and paid the price.
In the end, Arjun didn't play Cricket for his kid, or to gain his respect, or to play for India. He just did it because he wanted to play. He took retirement due to fear of death. But he came back because he wasn't scared to die anymore. His obsession took over his fear.
He knew it's better to die doing what he loves to do, instead of dying a bit daily. He could've done a normal 9 to 5 job, but that life would never have made him happy.
Should we judge Arjun for what he did? We can say he was selfish. He choose Cricket over his kid and his family. Left his wife as a widow and a son who would forever blame himself for his father's death. That is all true, but I also believe that people have the right to live their lives however they want, doing whatever they like.
Arjun went with this satisfaction that he died doing what he loved, instead of living another miserable 40 years and then dying blaming himself that his life could've been much better.
According to him, he could never have lived a satisfactory life with his family. He had the choice to be there for his son, to be with his wife, living a normal and long life if he wanted. But his first love was Cricket. He loved it more than his kid and his wife.
The director tried to make it seem like he decided to play Cricket again to gain back his son's respect. Because he tried to steal in his house and got humiliated by his son and wife. The movie tried to make the audience feel like he did it for his son, but that wasn't the case.
I think the writer and the director wanted to show Arjun's obsession as something healthy, which it wasn't. It's literally about a guy walking towards his death, not caring about his family.
Well...this was my take on the film.
28