Leela had a valid point - Page 7

Created

Last reply

Replies

66

Views

8.1k

Users

23

Likes

183

Frequent Posters

Rein123 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#61

Originally posted by: austen-eliot

@Bechain_bulbul Thank you for your beautifully put points on the comparitive importance of morality vs. education.

So according to the POV expressed by @Rein 123 rich people can exploit the poor, factory owners and company managers can ill treat their employees and labourers, and administrators and people in authority and governance do not have to follow any moral code with regards to those who are under them. Very nice.. Looks like Satan's utopia.

When did ever say that rich people are free to exploit the poor and those that work under them and that they don't have to follow any moral code of any sort? Don't twist my words as per your convenience

Edited by Rein123 - 3 years ago
Rein123 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#62

Originally posted by: Bechain_Bulbul


i cant believe what you just said here😲

did you really mean that? putting forward your point, disagreeing with popular opinion is a one thing but finding irrational excuses to support your claims is another thing.

If we go by what you have said then Vanraj is the greatest and ideal person. His mistakes doesnt matter. He can have as many affairs as he want, can treat his wife badly, abuse her physically, mentally and emotionally, can do partiality between his children just because he earns well?

Toshu can be a jerk, disrespect his mother, leave his family when they need him and go to give in luxurious house provided by his MIL, insults that very father who had always supported him, insults bapuji, siblings and your favorite, baa and he can get away with it just because he completed his education and found a decent job?

Pakhi can get away with all her so called "teen tantrums", the numerous times when she insulted her own mother, the times when she sided with kavya, her mother's "sautan", the times she was disrespectful towards everyone in family just because she is good in academics?

Samar's efforts wont be counted which he did to make his mother happy, his good deeds, the respect he has for his elders, the guts to stand up for right, the benevolent heart all that can go to hell because he was not interested in studies, he wanted to make career in dance, is it a sin to make career in arts?

please understand what you are saying first. and if this is the parameter on which you judge people then....well...what can I say...I rest my case.

I never said Vanraj is the greatest or the ideal person, I merely mentioned that he too has redeeming qualities that make him likeable amd relatable at times. The problem with you people is that you only see one side of the coin that is dark side and start bashing people based on just that as if they have never done anything right in their lives. People are not perfect and can make mistakes or have traits that may make them unlikeable but that doesn't mean they are completely evil or bad.

Yes you can be a prick as long as you fulfill your responsibilities, take Vanraj himself as an example, he may not be the best husband,or he may discriminate against samar but at the end of the day he has made sure that he fulfilled his part of job that is providing for the family right? Similarly Bapuji is like an angel compared to his son, the ideal husband and father but ironically the same person fell short when it came to being a provider for his family. You are bashing Vanraj based on the belief that every man should be like Anuj Kapadia. I am sorry but that just doesn't happen

Coming to Pakhi and Toshu, yeah it's totally okay because they have their own reasoning and perspective for behaving the way they do, not everyone is an anupamaa bhakt like samar, kinjal and nandini, I just don't understand why is it so wrong if the kids side with Vanraj over their mother?

It is not a sin to make a career in arts, but it is obviously not wise to give up studies just because of that otherwise Alia Bhatt wouldn't have been trolled for it that even brutally on Social media. Educated people command more respect than those who give it up, that's a fact irrespective of how they are.

moonwearer thumbnail
10th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 3 years ago
#63

Mere education does not earn one respect. Actions derived from good intent and kindness to all the respect shown to others makes you respectable.

We have Kavya MBA as a typical example. The vile creature thought the easiest way to secure her life is manipulate people and get the house deed on her name. It was because of Leela and Ladlas support that she was able to achieve that.

Paritosh can choose to move to the pent house and work for his MIL. That however does not give him the right to thrust his choice on Kinjal.

It does not give him the right to decide what his mother should do. The double standards of Leela her Ladlas lust and his Ladlas greed is what broke the family. At the end of the day what one needs is a simple meal served with love and care.

Anupama is ready to do that and so Bapuji and Mamaji move where she is.

Anj_01 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 180 Thumbnail + 7
Posted: 3 years ago
#64

Originally posted by: Rein123

I never said Vanraj is the greatest or the ideal person, I merely mentioned that he too has redeeming qualities that make him likeable amd relatable at times. The problem with you people is that you only see one side of the coin that is dark side and start bashing people based on just that as if they have never done anything right in their lives. People are not perfect and can make mistakes or have traits that may make them unlikeable but that doesn't mean they are completely evil or bad.


And I dont understand what is this recent phenomenon of fantasizing about out and out dark characters and pull them in purview of grey when they are absolutely not. Its going on everywhere on social media now.

Anyways, i do understand grey side of people. And i completely agree that people like anuj are not common, i dont even want all men to be ike him but definitely they shouldn't be like V also. V is not grey, he is dark completely. People use to say that whatever he was but he is a good son now after recent development would you call a man a good son if he can throw his old mother out of his house after insulting her in public. What is he now? A good son to only is father? People say he is a good brother who has sponsored dolly's education, marriage and financially supported her whenever needed but then he goes on and demand to repay all the debt by signing house papers. He do realize he did that in anger but how convenient, first snatch your sister's right then say with crocodile tears that you shouldn't have done it. If he was so guilty he could have tore the papers or at least apologize to dolly but no he didn't even think about her after that. V can never truly have any redemption. That man failed as son, brother, husband and father and even as lover because he is now emotionally cheating kavya for anupama.

If you really wanna see grey then see the number two show. ML there is what truly grey is. He had been borderline abusive husband but still he has done so many good things to so many people that he can be redeemed. But unfortunately people in those fanclubs are so FL bhakts that they start bashing people who disagree. While the truth is that I find the FL there as borderline psychotic.


Yes you can be a prick as long as you fulfill your responsibilities, take Vanraj himself as an example, he may not be the best husband,or he may discriminate against samar but at the end of the day he has made sure that he fulfilled his part of job that is providing for the family right? Similarly Bapuji is like an angel compared to his son, the ideal husband and father but ironically the same person fell short when it came to being a provider for his family. You are bashing Vanraj based on the belief that every man should be like Anuj Kapadia. I am sorry but that just doesn't happen


Yes there are no anuj kapadia in real life or may be very rare but no one wants to end up with V or bapuji like man either. Completely agree whatever your view point on bapuji but please V jaisa insaan hone se achha dub maro kahi. Still I would say that the fact you earn well doesn't give you a right to be absolutely jerk to the ones who depends on you financially. If you expect someone to take every shit from you because you pay their expenses then it is nothing but slavery which is wrong in every way ie. Legal, moral, human.


Coming to Pakhi and Toshu, yeah it's totally okay because they have their own reasoning and perspective for behaving the way they do, not everyone is an anupamaa bhakt like samar, kinjal and nandini, I just don't understand why is it so wrong if the kids side with Vanraj over their mother?


Accepted that samar is anu bhakt however he also has his own reasons and thought process to do so just like you said toshu and pakhi has different set of belief. Kinjal is not a bhakt. She had fight with anu over ghar ka kaam and she put her points well. She didn't like it when anu kicked out rakhi dave, it was evident from kinjal's face she was sad for her mother. But right now she is supporting anu because she is a sensible person and she can see what is right and what is wrong.

And even after having different perspective about life pakhi cant disrespect her mother in front of while family and emotionally blackmail her for living with her abusive cheater husband just because little pakhi wants her family together. Its sickening as a daughter, as a girl. She is not allowed anything like that just because she is good in academics and toshu is even not a self made man, he was dependent on his MIL for job and shelter. Even if he had been working independently, a son doesn't get the right to call his mother as character less woman in front of all. And you cant expect people to understand and respect such type of son.


It is not a sin to make a career in arts, but it is obviously not wise to give up studies just because of that otherwise Alia Bhatt wouldn't have been trolled for it that even brutally on Social media. Educated people command more respect than those who give it up, that's a fact irrespective of how they are.


I can understand from where you are coming here. What you believe is long taught theory in indian culture. My grandma used to say whenever we children wanted to play or do other activities for more time- padhoge likhoge banoge nawaab, kheloge kudoge banoge kharab. And we used to take it very seriously. Neither of us siblings were allowed to give more attention to extra curricular then academics and we used to believe its for our betterment.

But success in life, character building, how one person turns out be after growing up never completely depends on academic alone.

Sachin tendulkar did only high school but is worshipped like God. Lata mangeshkar ji a school drop out, had won several awards. Even these people are not well educated but no one makes fun of them.

Coming to alia bhatt, being educated and being aware is two different things. She became regular target of trolls after she gave epic answer in kjo show abouy maharashtra cm. So an uneducated person will also know the name of cm because if he cant read if can see news or hear discussions doing rounds among other people there are many source to have that info. Ranbir is a college graduate but he also once failed to tell the names of important political leaders in a show. So it never really depends on education. Its about personality, awareness, image and character building, achievements.


I dont see any end to this debate. We clearly have different opinions on all the above topics. So I end it here. Thank you for your time and patience. It was good to have a conversation with you.

Best wishes.

Harish111 thumbnail
Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail 14th Anniversary Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 3 years ago
#65

What a materialistic post. No one will put up with toxic people, no matter how rich or educated they are. Festival is time of joy not negativity. Toxic people will find themselves alone again and again and again in life


And imagine saying someone not caring for a husband wbo cheated on her for years or a mom in law who tortured for decades is wrong


So many claims of there being no Anuj in real life


In real life there is no Anupama to tolerate a cheating husabd and a torturing mom in law with a smile.


Life is your own. No one owes toxic people anything

Sutapasima thumbnail

Drama Enthusiasts

Posted: 3 years ago
#66

Friends please do vote here

https://www.indiaforums.com/forum/anupamaa/5263365/anupamaa-banner-contest-voting-round-closed

Your votes will decide the banner for the forum smiley31

Rein123 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 3 years ago
#67

Originally posted by: moonwearer

Mere education does not earn one respect. Actions derived from good intent and kindness to all the respect shown to others makes you respectable.

You mean like the blunder anupama did by getting defrauded because of her inability to read or understand?

We have Kavya MBA as a typical example. The vile creature thought the easiest way to secure her life is manipulate people and get the house deed on her name. It was because of Leela and Ladlas support that she was able to achieve that.

Paritosh can choose to move to the pent house and work for his MIL. That however does not give him the right to thrust his choice on Kinjal.

It does not give him the right to decide what his mother should do. The double standards of Leela her Ladlas lust and his Ladlas greed is what broke the family. At the end of the day what one needs is a simple meal served with love and care.

Anupama is ready to do that and so Bapuji and Mamaji move where she is.

Paritosh should not thrust or impose his choice on kinjal but what about Kinjal herself who is doing the exact same thing by expecting paritosh to live within the Shah house?

You are right he does not have the right to decide what his mother should do but ironically that same mother did that to him once already.

I agree with the double standards nurtured by leela however I find it funny that Bapuji is considered perfect inspite of falling shirt financially which is what his wife expected but Vanraj is monster inspite of providing for his family? Yes he cheated on his wife, but they got divorced already now so she is technically no longer his wife. He even stopped caring about Anuj Kapadia and Anupama altogether and is moving on but he is a bad guy just because Baa is the one praising him over her own husband?

Edited by Rein123 - 3 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".